Ross Stores, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROST) Q1 2027 Earnings Call Transcript

Ross Stores, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROST) Q1 2027 Earnings Call Transcript May 21, 2026

Ross Stores, Inc. beats earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $2.02, expectations were $1.73.

Operator: Good afternoon, and welcome to the Ross Stores First Quarter 2026 Earnings Release Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Before we get started, on behalf of Ross Stores, I would like to note that the comments made on this call will contain forward-looking statements regarding expectations about future growth and financial results, including sales and earnings forecasts, new store openings and other matters that are based on the company’s current forecast of aspects of its future business. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical performance or current expectations. Risk factors are included in today’s press release and the company’s fiscal 2025 Form 10-K and fiscal 2026 Form 8-Ks on file with the SEC. And now I’d like to turn the call over to Jim Conroy, Chief Executive Officer.

James Conroy: Thank you, John, and good afternoon, everyone. Joining me on our call today are Michael Hartshorn, Group President and Chief Operating Officer; Bill Sheehan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and Connie Kao, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations. Before we walk through the results, I would like to thank our associates for an exceptional first quarter. The entire organization contributed to the very strong performance. Our marketing team drove strong customer acquisition and engagement through a combination of creative messaging and changes to our media mix. Our merchants and planners delivered compelling assortments and worked tirelessly to secure product to feed the outsized demand. Our supply chain network stepped up their efforts to keep the stores in stock in a timely manner.

And finally, our stores team executed extremely well in supporting the increased product flow and customer activity. It was a remarkable group effort, and I couldn’t be more proud of the teamwork demonstrated across the entire organization. Thank you to the entire team. I will now turn to our first quarter results. We delivered an outstanding quarter with total sales up 21% and earnings per share growth of 37%. The overall growth in total sales was driven by a very robust 17% increase in comparable store sales. While we attribute a portion of this growth to the increase in tax refunds versus last year, we are quite pleased that the underlying fundamentals of our growth were extremely healthy. The comp increase was primarily driven by a growth in transactions, and we saw healthy increases in customer count on a comp store basis across income levels, ethnicities and all age groups, including the young customer.

In terms of monthly cadence, the quarter started strongly as we transitioned well from the holiday selling season into spring, supported by more balanced inventory levels that allowed us to drive strong demand in February, where we have historically struggled. The strength continued with solid mid-teen comps for the balance of the quarter. Performance at Ross was broad-based across both merchandise areas and geographies. While ladies and cosmetics were our strongest businesses, every major merchandise category posted comp growth in the teens or higher. Similarly, we saw strength across the entire country with the Midwest performing the best. dd’s DISCOUNTS also delivered solid top line sales with strong performance across merchandise categories and geographic regions.

Moving to inventory. Consolidated inventories at the end of the quarter were up 12% and packaway represented 36% of total inventory compared with 41% last year. We are pleased with the overall level and composition of our inventory entering the second quarter. Turning to store growth. We expanded into new and existing markets and opened 13 new Ross and 4 dd’s DISCOUNTS locations in the first quarter. We continue to plan for 5% unit growth for approximately 110 new stores this year, comprised of about 85 Ross and 25 dd’s. As usual, these numbers do not reflect our plans to close or relocate about 10 to 15 older stores. Consistent with our performance in 2025, we continue to be encouraged by the strength of the store openings in both new and existing markets.

Overall, we remain confident in our fundamental strategy to better connect merchandising, marketing and stores to create an improved customer experience. While the initial results are quite encouraging, we believe we are still in the early stages with many of our initiatives and see opportunities to drive continued growth in sales going forward. Now Bill will provide further details on our first quarter results and additional color on our second quarter outlook.

William Sheehan: Thank you, Jim. Turning to our financial results, starting with the first quarter. As Jim mentioned earlier, total sales for the quarter grew 21% to $6.0 billion. Comparable store sales grew a very robust 17%, primarily driven by an increase in the number of transactions. First quarter 2026 operating margin expanded 120 basis points to 13.4% compared to last year’s 12.2% and significantly exceeded our expectations. Cost of goods sold was 145 basis points lower in the quarter. Merchandise margin improved by 85 basis points, while occupancy leveraged by 60 basis points on the strong sales results. Distribution and domestic freight costs declined by 15 and 10 basis points, respectively. Partially offsetting these benefits were buying costs that rose 25 basis points due to higher incentives given the earnings upside.

SG&A for the period rose 25 basis points due to higher incentives given the outperformance. Both marketing and store-related costs leveraged during the quarter. First quarter net income was $650 million compared to $479 million last year, and earnings per share rose 37% to $2.02 from $1.47 in the prior period. Now to our shareholder return activity. As noted in today’s release, we repurchased 1.5 million shares during the quarter for an aggregate total cost of $319 million under the new 2-year $2.55 billion authorization approved by our Board of Directors in March of this year. We remain on track to buy back a total of $1.275 billion in stock during 2026. Before turning to our forward outlook, I’d like to briefly address tariff refunds. Like other companies, we have submitted refund claims for tariffs.

Given ongoing uncertainties related to the timing and ultimate amount of the reimbursement, we have excluded potential refunds from our forward guidance. Now turning to our outlook for the second quarter. As Jim noted earlier, we exited spring with solid momentum. As a result, we are projecting comparable store sales for the 13 weeks ending August 1, 2026, to be up 6% to 7% and earnings per share to be in the range of $1.85 to $1.93. The operating statement assumptions that support our second quarter guidance include the following: total sales are projected to increase 9% to 11% versus last year. The same-store sales perform in line with our forecast, operating margin for the second quarter is expected to be in the range of 12.8% to 13.0% compared to 11.5% last year.

The expected improvement reflects an increase in merchandise margin as well as lower distribution costs as we anniversary the opening of the new distribution center and tariff-related ticketing costs in the second quarter of 2025. We plan to add 47 new stores consisting of 35 Ross and 12 dd’s DISCOUNTS during the period. Net interest income is estimated to be $24 million. Our tax rate is expected to be approximately 25% and weighted average diluted shares outstanding are forecasted to be about 320 million. Now turning to the full year. We are raising our fiscal 2026 sales and earnings guidance to reflect the exceptional first quarter results and the solid second quarter guidance. In addition, our assumptions for the second half remain unchanged.

As a result, comparable store sales growth for fiscal 2026 are forecasted to increase 6% to 7% on top of a 5% gain last year. Earnings per share for the full year are now projected to be in the range of $7.50 to $7.74, up 13% to 17% when compared to $6.61 last year. Now I will turn the call back to Jim for closing comments.

James Conroy: Thank you, Bill. We are very encouraged by the strong momentum to start the year. I would like to take one more moment and recognize the entire team across the company. We were able to grow sales in the quarter by more than $1 billion and posted the highest same-store sales growth in the company’s 40-year history. Thank you all for all of your hard work and for the fantastic execution on our new growth initiatives. At this point, we would like to open the call and respond to any questions that you may have. John?

Q&A Session

Operator: [Operator Instructions] And the first question comes from the line of Matthew Boss with JPMorgan.

Matthew Boss: Great. And congrats on a really great quarter. So Jim, I guess the question is, could you help us to bottoms-up build, whether it’s the 17% comp in the first quarter or 9% comps, if I look at trends over the past year? And maybe just relative to the consistent 4% comp that the business generated pre-pandemic. What I’m trying to get at is how durable you believe that the drivers that’s putting together these kind of comps are today? And anything that you believe the business would need to give back as we think multiyear?

James Conroy: Sure. Great question. The company performed extremely well for years before I got here. I think if we made any changes, it’s really a shift towards more focus on customer acquisition. So if you think of the health of our comp — and I don’t think all comp sales growth is created equally. So the health of our comp has been driven by transactions for the third consecutive quarter, and it’s even more driven by transactions this quarter than even in the fourth quarter and the third quarter in terms of the transactions as a component of the overall comp. In terms of the durability, those transactions are driven by more customers. So we’re seeing a double-digit increase in customer count on a comp store basis. We’re seeing that very strong growth across all ethnicities, all age groups, including the young customer, all income levels.

And then if you think about the flywheel concept of bringing in more customers through marketing initiatives, great in-store environment, great merchandise selection, getting them in the store, converting shoppers into buyers with just compelling assortments and tidier stores and better in-store merchandising. And that just drives more comp store sales. It gives you more store labor and more marketing, and we talked about this on the last call. But we’re — we just have gotten started on many of these initiatives. So I think it is durable. We probably had 2 unique cases in the first quarter. One was idiosyncratic to Ross, which was the first quarter historically had been one where we were very conservative. So we probably had a little bit more pent-up demand to go after.

The second one was across all of retail, at least all of retail at our kind of price tier, which is we do believe that some portion of the sort of outsized comp could be attributed to higher tax rebates versus last year. But even if you strip those 2 things out, we just had a very, very strong quarter. And are quite pleased. It’s a really great team effort with every function in the business contributing.

Matthew Boss: Great, great color. Jim, you cited exiting the quarter with continued momentum, and I know you don’t lay out 6% to 7% forecast lightly. Have you seen any change in customer behavior so far in the second quarter or just any change in trends, maybe if we’re thinking about by category?

Michael Hartshorn: Matt, I wouldn’t comment on the second quarter, but maybe it would be helpful if I talked about the trends during the first quarter. The quarter started particularly strong in February. Jim talked about this a little bit, but we transitioned very well from holiday to spring selling, a place where we’ve struggled for a number of years. We’ve always been very, very conservative to start the year. And the merchant and planning team did a fabulous job of planning and executing against that transition. We continue to see mid-teen comp for the balance of the quarter. Some of that was likely aided somewhat by the tax refunds. Jim also mentioned that. And then the Easter calendar shift did move some demand. And again, that’s demand versus last year earlier in the quarter. So all in, we started very strong and had good momentum throughout the quarter.

Operator: And the next question comes from the line of Lorraine Hutchinson with Bank of America.

Lorraine Maikis: The 17% was an unprecedented comp and probably was a result of unprecedented amounts of chase inventory. So can you just talk about how comfortable you are with your inventory reserve levels and quality and ability to continue to chase into this 6% to 7% comp?

James Conroy: Sure. I think we’re very comfortable. The availability of closeouts in the marketplace is still outstanding. I think you’ll hear that from each of the players in the industry. I think our buyers are — and our merchants have been very aggressive. The whole — we did really have to react to a pretty sharp spike in sales and we’re able to feed demand. The other great thing is I think the market is now recognizing that our growth rate is a bit outsized. And we’re getting a lot of first calls now. And again, hats off to both of our Chief Merchants, Karen and Karen and their teams for really hustling to make sure we had product available and seasonally appropriate product to transition us from holiday to spring through Easter and Mother’s Day. It’s just been a fantastic execution. But I would not be worried about availability of product.

Operator: And the next question comes from the line of Paul Lejuez with Citigroup.

Tracy Kogan: It’s Tracy Kogan filling in for Paul. I think you guys said domestic freight leveraged this quarter. And I was wondering what the driver was there and what you’re building in for the year. And then I think ocean is a smaller piece for you, but wondering if you could give some color on what you’re seeing on that piece of freight as well. And then I have one follow-up.

William Sheehan: So as you mentioned, freight costs did lever 10 bps year-over-year, but higher expected fuel prices did limit some of that leverage that we typically get from that sales outperformance. And then going forward, we’re kind of finalizing freight contracts as we speak, and our guidance does reflect the assumption that we will have elevated fuel prices that will pressure freight costs, both ocean and domestic in the second quarter and the full year.

Tracy Kogan: And you guys mentioned traffic being the driver this quarter. I was hoping you could talk about some of the other metrics like average basket, AUR, units, conversion.

Michael Hartshorn: Sure, Tracy. So as we said, the primary driver was traffic. The average basket also grew, but by a significant lower proportion of the sales growth. And the units sold were flat.

Tracy Kogan: You said flat?

Michael Hartshorn: Yes. Units per transaction.

Tracy Kogan: Was flat? I’m sorry, I was just clarifying.

Michael Hartshorn: Flat. Yes, the units per transactions were flat.

Operator: And the next question comes from the line of Corey Tarlowe with Jefferies.

Corey Tarlowe: Great. I guess, Jim, as you think about how broad-based this really strong comp has been, can you talk about if you saw any inflections by category, whether it’s ladies, home, footwear or even juniors perhaps within ladies? And is there anything specific you think that’s driving that mix shift? Because there’s very clearly been quite a strong acceleration in trends quarter-over-quarter.

James Conroy: Yes. Thank you. The strength was broad-based and the sequential improvement was pretty broad-based also. Some of the categories that tend to get more focus, the ladies business had a very nice sequential improvement from the first quarter and actually outperformed the balance of the businesses. We called out cosmetics, also a nice sequential improvement and outperformed. But within ladies, lots of strength there. The juniors business was very strong. Just as we look down the categories in an effort to try to give a little bit more transparency and a little bit more color than I think is typical. We wanted to comment that every category was positive in the teens or higher. So we were obviously very, very pleased with the performance across the board. And every buying office should be just thrilled with what they were able to achieve.

Corey Tarlowe: Makes sense. And that’s also very helpful. I have a follow-up for Bill. Just as we think about the flow-through on comp versus plan, could you just remind us how to think about that and maybe what you saw in the quarter?

William Sheehan: For the quarter, the earnings flow-through on the robust sales was about — was actually above our expectations, but right in line with the model. So that felt pretty good. And then going forward, from our guidance perspective, as we talked about, we beat Q1 by about $0.35 — sorry, and are flowing about $0.38 for the full year based on the higher Q2 guide. So we feel like we’re right in line where we should be.

Michael Hartshorn: On the flow-through, so we typically say every point of comp is worth about 10 to 15 basis points. We were within that range at the high end of the range in the first quarter, some movement between categories. We were slightly better on merchandise margin in our normal flow-through, but we did spend more store payroll to support the increased product flow.

Operator: And the next question comes from the line of Michael Binetti with Evercore ISI.

Michael Binetti: Congrats on the quarter. I guess — let me think about that — the last answer there is, we delevered SG&A on a 17% comp. It sounds like there was some potential investment in incentive comp, certainly incentivized employees can help grow the top line. So it seems like a good investment. But does SG&A leverage on the 6% or 7% comp in the second quarter or the 2% to 3% comp that’s baked in the back half? Or if we come in above that, do we start looking for other buckets to invest in to support the top line?

Michael Hartshorn: Michael, maybe I’ll give some more color on the first quarter. As you said, and as we said in the commentary, we delevered by 25 basis points. That was all due to higher incentives. Without the incentives, both marketing and store-related costs leveraged during the quarter. We had, in our guidance, planned selling costs up slightly, and that was due to wage growth and with some investments and improvements in the store experience to drive top line growth. So with the strong comp that we believe was somewhat helped by those investments, we got leverage there.

William Sheehan: And then on the go forward, right, from a guidance perspective, right, the largest driver, right, is going to be merch margin. And we would expect to see some benefit in DC costs as we anniversary the opening of our Arizona distribution center. But we do, again, anticipate merch margin to remain a benefit in Q3 and Q4.

Michael Binetti: Okay. And then if I could follow that, on new stores, you gave us kind of a higher new store productivity assumption last year — last quarter, Michael, as far as modeling out relative to the 65% you gave us historically. But you’re delivering numbers well above that new guidance. I think it was 75%. I think it was something with a [ 90% ] handle this quarter. Can you just give us a little idea of the financial bridge into what looks to be a pretty different new store opening profile?

Michael Hartshorn: Sure. As we said, we have 110 openings, and we are in, I’d say, possibly in the best shape we’ve been in, in terms of getting leases done. So this year looks very, very good. And then our pipeline into next year also looks very good to maintain that 5% unit growth. You asked about new store productivity. Last year, our new store productivity was above that level. So there’s a number of stores that haven’t comped yet. Those stores continue to do very, very well. We gave you guidance for 70% to 75% of a mature store for the new stores this year. I’d say it’s very early, but we hope to beat that number.

Operator: And the next question comes from the line of Charles Grom with Gordon Haskett.

Charles Grom: Just to follow up on Michael’s question. Just NSP really strong. How are you thinking about units going forward? Do you still want to target the 5%? Do you think about densifying in the Northeast more? Just a little bit of thought on unit growth maybe over the next several years given how strong you’re opening up stores right now?

Michael Hartshorn: Yes. I think our — what we’re modeling internally is the 5% unit growth over the longer term. If we happen to get a big deal through bankruptcy or get ahead of that store opening, I don’t think we’d hesitate to increase that target.

Charles Grom: Okay. Anything geographically you think about differently?

Michael Hartshorn: Well, the Northeast is certainly open. We — that’s certainly built into our 5-year plan in New York. We have [ a loan ] and obviously, we’ll go further into the Northeast, but we exited ’25 with 12 stores in the New York area and have 2 locations in the first quarter, and those stores are doing very well for us.

Charles Grom: Got you. Great. And then as you think about the second half, right, and the tougher compares you’re about to lap, how do you think about the drivers to help you comp the comp? The implicit comp is a 2% to 3%. What gives you the confidence there in terms of the marketing and store changes, the product assortment? I guess how would you force rank what gives you the confidence to lap that positively?

James Conroy: I would circle back to some of my earlier comments on this call and on the prior call, there are 2 schools of thought. One is you’re up against strong comps and how you’re possibly going to get — put numbers on top of that. But the second is you’re in the early stages of transforming a company, you’re starting to build momentum. The comp is driven by more customers. That customer count increase continues to get stronger with each quarter. And we also have a lot of merchandising initiatives, right? We — the merchants are constantly opening up new brands. We found the confidence now to introduce brands that are more in the better and best price points and add those to the great stable brands that we already have.

So that may give us some more comp increase the stores have proven that they can contribute to the store growth, but they are in the very early stages of changing visual merchandising and store labor models and shifting hours, reallocating store labor hours to sales driving activities. And Aaron and that team have just done incredible work. But we’re still learning, right? We’re in the very, very early stages of many of these initiatives. So I hear you that people will constantly wonder if you can comp a 7% or 9% or 17%. Given the momentum that we’re seeing and given the underlying KPIs in the growth, meaning customer count across geographies, the strength in the transactions, at the risk of laying out new second half guidance right now, I think we have plenty of more opportunity for continuing very solid comps, maybe not a 17%, but very solid comps in the balance of the year.

Operator: And the next question comes from the line of Brooke Roach with Goldman Sachs.

Brooke Roach: Jim, I was hoping you could reflect on what’s working very well in marketing today and what we should expect might change as we look into the back half of the year as you annualize some of these initiatives?

James Conroy: Sure. I think you’ll see more of what we have been doing. We’re really trying to modernize the creative message. We’re mixing up our media mix. We’re doing more events. All of those things are adding to the proverbial top of funnel. We’ve got some pretty exciting things upcoming. It’s — in a competitive industry like off-price, sometimes it’s hard to give more color because you then see it end up in one of your competitors and what they’re doing. But suffice it to say, I think that we’re in the very, very early stages of focusing on the Ross and dd’s brands contemporizing them and having them get their own sort of followership. And you can see it, right? You can follow us on social media. You can see our television spots. And it’s — I think it’s a very refreshed view of how to go to market in retailing and certainly in off-price retailing. So stay tuned. There’s a lot more coming over the next few months from a marketing standpoint.

Brooke Roach: Great. And then just a quick follow-up. I was hoping you could put a finer point on your expectations for fuel surcharges for the year. Can you quantify the headwind that you’re expecting in the back half? And what oil price is embedded within the guidance?

William Sheehan: We try and estimate based on what the DOE and others estimate. And so like we said, we do expect some pressure in the second half. But again, if fuel prices differ materially from where they are now, then we’d see some additional pressure. So that’s something we’re monitoring closely and try and get the best estimates that we can.

Operator: And the next question comes from the line of Mark Altschwager with Baird.

Mark Altschwager: It seems a little silly to ask about consumer headwinds when you reported a 17% comp and you’re guiding 6% to 7%. But just wondering if you’re seeing any indications of shifts in consumer behavior as the inflationary pressures have picked up. You said strength broad-based across regions, but any color on California specifically where gas prices are even higher?

Michael Hartshorn: Just to — on your first question on both customer count and comp growth, we did not see a variation across income levels. Actually, all income levels were very strong. California performed in line with the chain during the quarter. I would say on fuel costs generally, historically, it’s been hard for us to see any immediate direct correlation between fuel prices and our sales performance. That said, obviously, the potential impact can vary based on the magnitude and how long the increased fuel prices last. I would also add the silver lining for off-price is that any uncertainty in the macro environment could lead to customers seeking more value when shopping and create closeout opportunities for us for the supply side.

Mark Altschwager: And a follow-up for Jim. If you could give us an update on the branded apparel rollout. How broad is the strategy beyond ladies at this point? And with the acceleration you’re seeing in new customer acquisition and overall growth, how are you thinking about that balance between the good, better, best and what’s resonating most with that newer customer you’re bringing in?

James Conroy: So the brand strategy in ladies and across the entire business is now very much in place and has been — I think we’ve lapped it a few quarters ago. It was a great adjustment to kind of correct the time when perhaps the business, certainly before I got here, had evolved away from some of the really compelling brands and the company was able to correct that also before I got here. So there’s a lot of people that are working really hard to put that in place. And we can see it in the strength and now the pervasive strength in the ladies business mostly, but perhaps it’s also a part of the strategy across the board. In terms of good, better, best, we’re hyper focused on that right now because you’re right to call out the potential softness and pressure in consumer, and it’s all over the news, it’s what other retailers are calling out, et cetera.

So we have to ensure that we’re in stock with sort of the best bargains across price points, but certainly the good price points. But then when we look at our data, our customer KPIs are unbelievably strong, right? More customers shopping more frequently and spending more in each trip. So we’re — now we’re trying to find if there’s even some more opportunities to stretch our prices, not on same goods, but on new brands and new goods and really just deliver even a broader assortment for our customer out there. So we’re just — we’re really thrilled with sort of the health of the business, and we’re very cognizant of what’s happening in the macro environment. We want to deliver the absolute best bargains and best values for our customers, particularly those under pressure from the price of oil or gas prices, et cetera.

But we also have this sort of growing customer base that seems to be responding across good, better and best.

Operator: The next question comes from Dana Telsey with the Telsey Advisory Group.

Dana Telsey: Congratulations on the very nice results. Given the new customer acquisition that seems to have accelerated in the flywheel of marketing driving new customers, as you think about the sales gains that you had, the new customer acquisition, any different demographic profile, younger, maybe wealthier with the trade down? Anything you’re seeing there? And then how do you think of the cadence of marketing spend as you go through the balance of the year? Is one quarter more allocated than another? And then just lastly, on the New York stores, the 12 that you mentioned, how much higher are they than your plan? What are you seeing that’s new or different? And how do you think of Northeast openings as a percentage of the total mix going forward?

James Conroy: All right. Dana, thanks for the questions. I’ll get started. I think Michael will take the stores question. In terms of by customer group, it’s one of those report cards that you just — you almost can’t believe, but we’ve had customer growth across every ethnicity, every age group and every income level. I think the part that — and we can — we’re using the sort of third-party available credit card data. I think the 2 things that would make our customer count unique relative to the rest of retail right now is certainly the magnitude. I think the number of customers that we’re capturing and the year-over-year increase based on what we can see for us and for other players is higher. And then notably, the younger customer that sort of very difficult to attract 18- to 24-year-old customer.

We’re just outperforming virtually every other retailer that we can track. So those 2 pieces, if you’re looking for nuances, that younger customer has really gravitated towards us, which is — has been part of the strategy and is really starting to take root. In terms of the cadence of the spend, firstly, we’re — as a rate of sales, we didn’t spend any more in the first quarter than we did last year. In fact, we got a little bit of leverage there. We continuously get questions as, well, should we be investing more? And maybe over time, we will. But right now, we’re certainly driving healthy traffic and comps with the marketing spend that we have. As we look at it by quarter, there might be some small investments here or there in the balance of the year.

Nothing that will move the needle in a material way. And clearly, we spend more money in holiday quarter in absolute dollars, but not necessarily as a rate. So that’s sort of our view right now from a marketing standpoint. And then from a stores perspective, Michael will take that one.

Michael Hartshorn: Dana, obviously, we’re very excited about further expansion into the Northeast. I don’t want to forget about our existing markets. Right now, our new store growth, only about 20% of our new store growth is in the newer markets. What I can tell you about the New York stores, as you know, not every store is created equal, but I can give you a benchmark versus our underwriting pro forma, and we’ve far exceeded our expectations of what we thought were needed from an underwriting standpoint. So we’re very excited about the expansion. We see we can be very successful. Obviously, the population density in the Northeast is very similar, actually, more population density than even our oldest market of California. So we’ll — the Northeast real estate department has done a nice job of beginning to write leases there, and we’ll have more to say as we expand our rollout in 2027.

Operator: And the next question comes from the line of Simeon Siegel with Guggenheim.

Simeon Siegel: Really nice job. I’m going to try and sneak 3 quick ones in, if I can. What percent of the growth in transactions at this point are coming from new customer acquisition versus that greater frequency of existing that you mentioned, Jim? And then how are you thinking about the timing of CapEx this year? I think Q1 was somewhat similar to last year, but you do have the lift guided for the full year? And then just taking a quick step back, just any help on long-term EBIT margin opportunity, recognizing the kind of the ongoing strength we’re hearing from you? Maybe how are you thinking about benchmarking that or analyzing that opportunity?

James Conroy: That was impressive. Very, very quick in getting all 3 of those questions. I’ll take the first one and then Michael and Bill will take the others. Without parsing out the components of the comp too finely, I would say, and we’re on record already saying transactions was the primary driver of the comp. And of the transactions, new customers was the primary driver of that.

William Sheehan: On the CapEx side, we typically don’t get into parsing it out by quarter. It’s not skewed particularly at all. We are slightly up this year, but I don’t think it’s very divergent by quarter.

Michael Hartshorn: In total, we’re still estimating about $1.1 billion in capital versus $819 million last year. I think your last question is on the long-term operating margin. Our model hasn’t changed at this point. We’ve said double-digit EPS growth, about 5% unit growth at 60% to 70% productivity drives 3% to 4% EPS growth. Long-term gains at 3% to 4% on comp, and I’ll come back to that in a second and 2% to 3% from share repurchase program. If we can comp higher than the 3% to 4%, we’d expect outsized EBIT growth.

Operator: And the next question comes from the line of Krisztina Katai with Deutsche Bank.

Krisztina Katai: Great quarter. Congrats. So I wanted to ask on cosmetics. Obviously, it was a standout in the quarter. Is that primarily branded availability? Is it consumer trade into prestige, just getting the trend right or increased space allocation? And how durable is that?

James Conroy: Well, I think it’s several things. I think, one, the team, Michael K. and Stephanie have just done an unbelievable job of driving that business, and that’s been a standout for — from a category perspective for several quarters now. Secondly, they’ve done a really nice job of bringing in new brands. And you can see them in the store, but there’s some new hot kind of exploding brands that are now selling to us, which have been fantastic. And then thirdly, there is a little bit of just an underlying consumer trend there. Korean beauty products is one of them, and they’ve really done a great job being on top of that. So in terms of space allocation, we haven’t really changed the space allocation stores for cosmetics in any meaningful way. So I think they’ve — their sales productivity on a per square foot basis has just gone up quite nicely.

Krisztina Katai: Great. And if I can just ask a follow-up, just very quickly, like you mentioned gaining priority access to deals. Just can you talk about how that is showing up the buying cost, IMU, speed to floor conversion rates? And then just considering your strong top line, can that advantage expand further?

James Conroy: Sure, sure. I think the sentiment in the market — and look, we’re 1 of 3 big competitors out there. The relationships that the merchants have with the off-price market is critical. And the relationships that the Ross merchandising team has is just remarkable. I marvel as a new entry into this world of how relationship-based it is. Having said that, I think the market is starting to see the transformation of Ross going from a very good company and accelerating from there. And it’s getting noticed. And I think now when someone has a good deal or more closeouts, we’re getting calls and it’s partly because we can take the goods. We have seen some cancellations in the market, some from mainstream retail and some from other off-pricers that we are able to pick up.

So I think the last thing I would say is I think our merchants not only have great relationships, but tend to be very easy to work with, with the market, and that’s a philosophy that I inherited from my predecessor, and we absolutely want to continue to do that. We want to be partner-like and low friction. But we’ve seen — we’ve opened up new vendors, and we’ve seen a lot of sort of early calls on opportunistic goods.

Operator: And the next question comes from Aneesha Sherman with Bernstein.

Aneesha Sherman: Congrats on the quarter. I have 2, please. Jim, you mentioned the word transformation earlier on in your comments. I wanted to ask, over the last year, the company has pursued a lot of new initiatives in marketing, assortment, stores, et cetera. Do you think there’s been a cultural shift in how decisions are being made that is driving this broader set of ideas and initiatives across the company? And then I have a follow-up as well.

James Conroy: Look, I inherited a well-run company with a great culture. I think if there’s been any sort of shift in how we operate, it was a little bit of harkening back to the earlier days in Ross when it was very entrepreneurial. And we’ve sort of challenged ourselves to spark more growth, empower people to make quick decisions, be entrepreneurial, balance our pretty heavy focus on risk aversion with a little bit more of a growth orientation. And I think internally, the team has been very welcoming of that. So yes, I would say if you think of a continuum between playing defense and offense, we’ve shifted the whole company and the culture a little bit more towards offense, but still always being prudent and not taking undue risk. But again, I just want to say one more time. I was very lucky to be able to inherit a company that was already very well run and already successful. And we’ve just been able to layer on some initiatives to augment that growth.

Aneesha Sherman: And then a follow-up on an earlier comment on double-digit growth in customer counts. Can you give us some color on what that looked like the last 2 quarters, the last couple of quarters, Q3 and Q4? I want to get a sense of has that run rate increased just to help us think through the back half of the year and the comp year-over-year growth in the back half?

James Conroy: So it’s been building. We definitely didn’t get a double-digit growth in customers and then comp lower than double digits, fortunately. But it has — if you were to think of it in the way we think of retail same-store sales, you would say we’ve had sequential improvement in customer count growth on a comp store basis in each of the last 2 quarters.

Operator: And the next question comes from the line of Marni Shapiro with Retail Tracker.

Marni Shapiro: Congratulations. And Jim, I love how you sound so pleasantly surprised that the market loves the Ross buyers. That’s always been the case. I knew them a long, long time ago and everyone loved them. So congratulations on that. Could you — you have talked about updating and renovating some of the stores. Some of it was just a light touch, if you can just — modernizing them. If you can give an update on how that’s going? And are those stores outperforming? And then could you just also give us an update? I’m assuming this is true that you’ll continue with your buyback through the rest of the year.

Michael Hartshorn: Marni, it’s Michael. As you said, we’ve been working on refreshing all stores in the chain. And again, it was to try to give a more modern look and feel for our customer. And the refresh was mainly new perimeter signing and wayfinding signage along with addressing cosmetic repairs. We got through about half of the chain last year. We decided to pause for 2 reasons. First, we wanted to be able to measure the sales impact. And we did see a sales impact in those stores. We saw improvement in customer surveys on the shopping experience. We decided this year to pause as we’re looking to see what kind of things we want to do to the store. And when I say that, it doesn’t mean we’re going to go back and refresh every single store in the chain, come up with a new pro forma and have a big capital outlay.

But we wanted to pause and see if there’s other changes we want to make in the next half of the stores and then also look at new store prototypes if there’s anything we want to change from look and feel or how we’re merchandising the store. So that’s where we are at this point.

William Sheehan: And then regarding the buyback, no change there. We remain on track to buy the total of $1.275 billion in stock during 2006 — ’26, sorry, so that’s unchanged.

Operator: And the next question comes from the line of Dylan Carden with William Blair.

Dylan Carden: I’m curious, Jim, to the questions on — or in and around new customers, do you feel that between access to brands, some of the new marketing you’re doing that you’re kind of meaningfully structurally expanding your market? Or is it just sort of recapturing share within your existing market, either going up or down market? You mentioned kind of younger customers, this for more meaningful change go forward?

James Conroy: It’s a very insightful question. At the risk of tipping our hand too much, that’s absolutely part of the strategy. It’s we have a bull’s eye of a core customer, and we have to ensure that we’re constantly focused on that customer that has sort of built this business, but how do we — in concentric circles around that core, how do we add new customer segments. So that’s part of the strategy. It’s very early in our evolution in doing that. But the early read is that we’ve been able to introduce the Ross brand into different pockets of consumer shoppers. And it’s — again, it’s a very insightful strategic question, Dylan, I appreciate it. And I think you’re on the right track there.

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, there are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the call back over to Jim Conroy for any closing comments.

James Conroy: Well, thank you, everyone, for joining us today, and we look forward to speaking with you on our next earnings call. Take care.

Operator: And ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation. That does conclude today’s teleconference. Please disconnect your lines, and have a wonderful day.