RBC Bearings Incorporated (NYSE:RBC) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

RBC Bearings Incorporated (NYSE:RBC) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript May 16, 2025

RBC Bearings Incorporated beats earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $2.83, expectations were $2.68.

Rob Moffatt: Good morning, and thank you for joining us for RBC Bearings Fiscal Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. I’m Rob Moffatt, Director of Corporate Development and Investor Relations. And with me on today’s call are Dr. Michael Hartnett, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; Daniel Bergeron, Director, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; and Rob Sullivan, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. As a reminder, some of the statements made today may be forward-looking and are made under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those projected or implied due to a variety of factors. We refer you to RBC Bearings recent filings with the SEC for a more detailed discussion of the risks that could impact the company’s future operating results and financial condition.

These factors are also listed in the press release along with a reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP financial information. With that, I’ll now turn the call over to Dr. Hartnett.

Michael Hartnett: Thank you, Rob, and good morning and thank you for joining us. I’m going to start today’s call with a quick review of our financial results, and I’ll finish with some high-level thoughts on the industry, our outlook for fiscal 2026 and then hand it over to Rob Sullivan for more detailed color on the numbers. Fourth quarter sales came in at $438 million, a 5.8% increase over last year, driven by continued strong performance in our A&D segment and other very strong performance in the industrial businesses, particularly when viewed against the broader industrial trends. Consolidated gross margin for the quarter was 44.2% versus 43.1% for the same-period last year and adjusted diluted EPS was $2.83 a share versus $2.47 a share, up 14.6%.

Clearly, we’re thrilled to see the results, and this reflects the energy and commitment everyone invested to make this year successful. So, a big thank you to Team RBC. Total A&D sales were up 10.6% year-over-year with 11.6% growth on the commercial aerospace and 8.2% on defense. On the industrial side, the segment grew 3.3% year-over-year with distribution and aftermarket up 2.5% and OEM up an impressive 5.1%. In A&D, we saw broad strength across the portfolio. Our leading sources of growth came from engine OEMs, commercial spare parts, commercial fixed wing aircraft, missiles and guided munitions, and of course, space. For the full year, A&D sales grew at 14% with commercial aero up 13.3% and defense up 15.9%. Although the FAA constrained production and a prolonged strike at our largest customer coupled with other challenges that the industry faced this past year, we still grew the business at 14% and expanded margins as planned.

We clearly benefited from the breadth and diversity of RBC’s portfolio, giving us exposure to many different customers and many different parts of the supply-chain. This includes a healthy balance between aftermarket and OEM, fixed wing and rotary craft and commercial and defense. We also benefited from highly targeted organic growth initiatives focused on specific customers and programs that not only contributed to fiscal 2025 but should continue to benefit us in 2026 and well beyond. Moving over to industrial segment, we delivered a 3.3% growth this quarter. We were able to grow the business on a full year basis, even in an environment where the industrial economy has seen two consecutive years of contraction as measured by the manufacturing PMI.

High service levels, lots of internal can do and incremental progress on new product introductions were the reasons. Our outgrowth relative to peers and the broader industrial economy has been notable, and I want to commend our teams for measuring up to the high bar they reached. Results like this don’t happen by chance. They are the result of our relentless focus on our organic growth during our ops meetings and the ambitious goals of our managers that are willing and those goals that they’re willing to take on. Coming into the year, we talked about how our focus at Dodge is in the early innings of evolving from delivering cost synergies to driving revenue synergies and that accelerating growth was the major priority for fiscal 2025. I’m proud to say that these early efforts appear to be paying-off.

Year-over-year OEM sales growth in the Dodge business has been in the double digits for the past three quarters and a very strong finish in the fourth quarter and enabled them to finish with a double-digit OEM sales growth for the full year. Keep in mind, OEM wins today pay, pay after — pay in the aftermarket and MRO dividends for years to come. With fiscal 2025 behind us, let’s spend a little time talking about 2026. In terms of end markets, we believe commercial aero is poised for growth of at least 15%, driven primarily by the expected year-over-year production growth at Boeing and Airbus. Last year had its challenges for Boeing, but the company appears to be making substantial progress under its new CEO and recent trends are very encouraging to the industry.

On the defense side, we are comping against substantial growth of nearly 22% in fiscal 2024 and 16% in 2025. Even against this high bar, we believe we can grow the business at least in the mid-to-high single-digits and likely more. We are adding additional capacity at several plants to accommodate very strong demand from a wide array of defense OEMs. Certainly, this led by growth in submarines coupled with broader strength across RBC’s portfolio in support of the government’s proposed trillion-dollar defense budget. For the industrial businesses, end markets are a little tougher to predict due to the short-term impact of interest rates, tariffs, consumer spending, and general GDP expansion or not. In any event, we feel the MRO side of the world that supports the staples of human life such as food and beverage, grain, aggregate, mining, forest products, sewage treatment, provide a steady demand for our North American product offering and are essential to keep the wheels of American industry turning and America’s population fed.

The last topic I want to touch on before handing the call over to Rob is the balance sheet. Last quarter, we crossed the two-turn mark from a net leverage perspective. And this quarter, we pushed it even lower. In total, we allocated $275 million to debt repayment in fiscal 2025, taking our trailing net leverage to 1.7 turns exiting the year. We remain well poised to pursue additional accretive M&A, and the team has been very active in keeping the pipeline full of ideas. Looking ahead, fiscal 2026 is poised to be another strong year for RBC. The backdrop for growth across all of our channels is substantial, and our team is laser-focused on executing at the highest level. With that, I’d like to turn over the call to Rob Sullivan for more details.

Rob Sullivan: Thank you, Mike. As Dr. Hartnett indicated, this was another strong quarter for RBC. Net sales growth of 5.8% drove gross profit growth of 8.5% with more than 110 basis points of expansion. The quarter benefited from strong manufacturing performance coupled with the structural drivers of our gross margin performance, including Dodge synergies, increased utilization of our aerospace and defense manufacturing assets, and the continuous improvement focus on the RBC ops management process. Industrial gross margins during the quarter were 45.7%, and aerospace and defense margins were 41.5%. On the SG&A line, we continued our investments in future growth. This included a combination of investments in personnel costs and back-office support, including IT.

This resulted in adjusted EBITDA of $139.8 million, up 7.4% year-over-year and adjusted EBITDA margin of 31.9%, which was up 50 basis points year-over-year. Interest expense in the quarter was $12.8 million. This was down 31.8% year-over-year, reflecting the ongoing repayment of our term loan, as well as a lower rate on the loan as the SOFR base rate has moved lower. The tax rate in our adjusted EPS calculation was 21.7%, reasonably consistent versus last year’s 21.2%. Altogether, this led to adjusted diluted EPS of $2.83, representing growth of 14.6% year-over-year, an impressive result given the choppiness in commercial aerospace customer production schedules and the macroeconomic softness in the industrial economy. Free cash flow in the quarter came in at $55 million with conversion of 76% and compares to $70 million and 113% last year.

The lower conversion rate this quarter was primarily the result of timing around accounts receivable, driven by year-over-year increased sales. As usual, we use the cash generated to continue to deleverage the balance sheet. We repaid $82 million of the debt during the quarter, taking our total year-to-date debt reduction to $275 million. All in, this is another strong year for free cash flow generation, and all of that cash flow is applied to debt reduction. This takes our trailing net leverage to 1.7 turns, leaving our balance sheet in an increasingly attractive position to pursue additional accretive M&A. Looking into the first quarter, we are guiding to revenues of $424 million to $434 million, representing year-over-year growth of 4.4% to 6.8%.

That guidance embeds an operating environment that’s fairly similar to the fiscal fourth quarter. On the margin side, we are projecting gross margins of 44.25% to 44.75% for the quarter, which at the midpoint would be up against the full year fiscal 2025 performance. Our focus on continuous improvement on the margin line marches on and can be seen in our outlook for full-year gross margin expansion of 50 basis points to 100 basis points, which will likely be back-half weighted. This is inclusive of all tariffs at the current levels. We currently expect tariff pressure to be minimal and believe we can mitigate the expected headwinds and still deliver margin expansion on a full-year basis. Similar to prior years, we expect to reinvest some of this margin expansion into fueling future growth through investments in the SG&A line.

We expect other factors to be normal as well, including free cash flow conversion of 100%, adjusted taxes in the 22% to 23% range, and CapEx in the range of 3% to 3.5% of sales. In closing, this was another strong quarter for RBC, and we are poised for another strong year. We remain focused on leveraging our core strengths in engineering, manufacturing, and product development to drive both organic and inorganic growth, continuous improvement in operating efficiency, and high levels of free cash flow conversion. With that operator, please open the call for Q&A.

Operator: Certainly, we’ll now be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is coming from Kristine Liwag from Morgan Stanley. Your line is now live.

Q&A Session

Kristine Liwag: Hey, good morning, everyone.

Michael Hartnett: Good morning.

Rob Sullivan: Hi, Kristine.

Kristine Liwag: So maybe first question on commercial aerospace. I mean, we’re starting to finally see Boeing production rate move in that positive trajectory. So, I guess I wanted to level set. Can you remind us when we actually get to, let’s say, $50 per month for the 737 MAX and 10 per month for the 787? I mean, how much bigger is your commercial aerospace OE business at that point? And then also, when we think about margins, you guys have done an incredible job holding onto margins even though production rates have been uncertain. When we get to that full run rate, how should we think about the margin opportunity?

Michael Hartnett: Well Kristine, you asked some difficult questions as usual.

Kristine Liwag: And I’m hoping you’re going to have some great answers.

Michael Hartnett: Yeah, well, we’re — actually, you would be the person I would go to ask when Boeing is going to get to the 50 a month. So, right now we’re hoping to see them get to the 38 number, which I think they’re going to get to very soon within a month or two. And then apparently they’re pretty far along with the FAA on approving the key metrics and which sort of turns on the next 10 planes for them. So we’re thinking that it’s going to be not too deep into calendar ’26 before we start seeing plane builds in the upper 40s. On that…

Kristine Liwag: Is that revenue?

Michael Hartnett: Is that how you see it?

Kristine Liwag: Yeah, I mean, I just looked at the May deliveries, and we’re only in the halfway part of May, and they got to some pretty good production numbers. So, I think I would agree with your assessment of the 38 is going to be very soon. But what I wanted to ask you is like, so when you do get to that 40s per month or even eventually 50, I mean, how much bigger could your revenue be? Because you want a lot of shipset content for the MAX versus the NG that we didn’t really see the full benefit of because of the disruption in production. So, I just wanted to understand, could your Boeing commercial OE revenue be at this point 2x versus 2019? Just some sort of level-setting numbers around that, Mike.

Michael Hartnett: Okay. Well, let me do a little math here and maybe come back at the other end of the Q&A, and I’ll have my math done.

Kristine Liwag: Sounds good. And then in the meantime, in industrials, I was wondering, I mean, the — you guys were very clear that this — that the growth that you’re seeing is from the improvement of — from the strategy of your team versus the end markets. Can you give a little bit more color on exactly what kind of initiatives you took and how much that provided you in terms of incremental growth versus end markets? And could you sustain your leadership in growth versus peers in this cycle?

Michael Hartnett: Yeah. On the industrial side? Yeah, yeah, I think — well, a couple of things there. I think first of all, there was some product lines that had service level problems that at Dodge that after we acquired the company and we started working on and making it a priority with the Dodge folks to improve the service levels and the production capacity for certain products. And certainly they did that, and the markets — market responded very well to that initiative. I mean, that’s sort of the easiest thing to fix, because of, you know, you don’t have to worry about product development and testing and long cycle kind of things. So, you really want to get at the service level problems first. And then on the longer cycle they had — Dodge had several products that were through the test cycle when we acquired the business, but weren’t capitalized or capitalization and wasn’t encouraged.

I think it was just, they were busy selling the business for a couple years, so things — priorities change. And so, we were the benefit — benefactors or beneficiaries of that business, and we were able to turn on some of those new products pretty quickly. And so that’s certainly accruing to the overall benefit. And then I think the third thing, there’s longer-term opportunities that Dodge has that sort of are in the pipeline right now that will take a little bit longer to mature, but have some significant market positions once matured. So, it’s overall a pretty healthy outlook for them.

Kristine Liwag: Great. Thank you.

Michael Hartnett: Yeah.

Operator: Thank you. Next question today is coming from Michael Ciarmoli from Truist Securities. Your line is now live.

Michael Ciarmoli: Hey, good morning, guys. Nice results. Thanks for taking the questions. Hey, Rob, do you happen to — I know we’ll get it in the queue. Do you happen to have the gross margins by segment for the quarter?

Rob Sullivan: I did read them out in my script, but I will repeat them. The industrial gross margins were 45.7% this quarter and A&D was 41.5%.

Michael Ciarmoli: Got it. And do we — how are we — I know you gave some color on ’26. Any thoughts? I mean, I guess the gross margin expansion maybe seems a bit conservative, assuming we get the volumes. And I know that’s, you know, still a bit of a wildcard, everything from Boeing sounding better. But if we get more margin expansion, I’m assuming it comes on the aerospace and defense side. Is it fair to say there’s more runway there?

Rob Sullivan: Yeah. I think, we certainly see a lot of runway. You can see the gap between A&D and industrial, and where A&D is today versus where it’s demonstrated its ability in the past leaves us opportunity to expand with more throughput in the plants. We’ve spoken about some of the contract renewals that will come up late in the year and the increased volumes, all kind of contributing. So we think that the gross margins in A&D certainly have some runway there. And as I mentioned, that expansion looks like it could be back-half weighted 50 bps to 100 bps.

Michael Ciarmoli: Got it. And then you guys gave some pretty good detail on ’26, with I’d say more of that contained to aero, and I get the industrial environments probably a little bit more fluid and harder to predict. But I mean, if we kind of mash it together, it sounds like the aero side of the house can grow low teens. I mean, if you kind of imply low-single, maybe mid-single for industrial, are you guys comfortable with a $1.7 billion to $1.8 billion revenue kind of bogey for next year?

Rob Sullivan: I think we’re really sticking to the direct guidance for the next quarter as we always do. Yeah, we’ve offered some color on the A&D for the full year, and we’ll go from there.

Michael Ciarmoli: Okay. Last one, and I’ll jump back in the queue. You talked about minimal tariff impact. I mean, is there any change in your thought process around kind of your sentiment or views on tariffs? I mean, the commentary last quarter, I think it was talking about adding space and fuel that would be strongly net good for the business. So, has anything kind of changed around tariffs, the ability to offset with pricing, are you seeing any share gains as customers potentially rethink their supply chains, looking for domestic sources?

Michael Hartnett: Well, I think the short-term versus long-term. I mean, short-term, we have a certain supply chain and so on and so forth. So there’s a — we’ve looked at it pretty closely, and we think short-term we’re neutral on — for the most part on tariff impact. For the long-term, I think it’s depending upon the extent of the tariff. The larger the tariff, the more we’re going to benefit. Just because there’s going to be shortages everywhere and the right mix will find us. We won’t have to search for it.

Michael Ciarmoli: Got it. Understood. All right. Thanks guys. I’ll jump back in the queue.

Operator: Thank you. Next question today is coming from Steve Barger from KeyBanc Capital Markets. Your line is now live.

Steve Barger: Thanks. Good morning.

Michael Hartnett: Good morning.

Steve Barger: Mike, you talked about organic growth initiatives targeted at specific customers and programs, but I know the team is always in front of people. So is this an acceleration of existing programs, or are you trying something new, and what does that look like?

Michael Hartnett: Well, it depends upon whether you’re talking A&D or industrial. I mean, obviously, the way the A&D works, you’re always in front of people with new programs. I mean, it’s just the way the business is working, seems like it’s always worked that way. Industrial, it’s a little different. I think, Dodge has had pretty much over the years, a pretty fixed mix and a well-honed process. And so, Dodge, we’re taking a few additional steps to invigorate their OEM business, and that’s having modest gains.

Steve Barger: Is that targeting more wallet share with existing customers, or are you casting a broader net for new customers?

Michael Hartnett: Both. Absolutely both. And we’re doing some things to make it easier for new customers to do business with us. And we’re opening up some geographic regions that have been where we really didn’t have significant representation or customer reach in the past.

Steve Barger: Got it. You may have talked about this in the past, but what are the new regions that you’re really targeting?

Michael Hartnett: Well, I think there’s the most productive regions are in North America. The more exotic and higher risk regions are elsewhere in the world. South America, India, Mexico, places like that.

Steve Barger: Got it. And then last question. I know capacity utilization is always a tricky question because of productivity initiatives and your ability to run overtime or add a shift. But if you’re going to post double-digit growth in A&D and we also get a firmer industrial production cycle, how much flexibility do you have in the plants to support that higher growth right now?

Michael Hartnett: Well, I’m glad you asked that question, because you know, we’ve got a lot of plants and the demand on these plants isn’t the same on all the plants. I mean, some plants are overloaded with demand, some plants are just well balanced. And so, on the A&D side of it, it looks like about 70% of our revenues, plants that make 70% of our revenues are way over demand and capacity are not balanced. There’s far more demand than there is capacity. So, that’s — we’ve had, we’ve had what, double digit growth for the last couple of years in those businesses. And inevitably, we kind of hit a capacity ceiling in some of those businesses and we’re working our way through that ceiling now. And so that’s capital, machinery, labor.

So, we’re adding labor, we’re adding hours and we’re adding machinery. And actually, we’re moving machinery from plants that are balanced and can do with less machinery to plants that are — where demand is — and capacity is constrained. So, all that has taken place as we speak and so we’re going to grow our throughput in those A&D plants through the — through this year and it’s going to continue next year. It’s going to be the same process at least for the next two years. We’re just going to be, chasing this for a while. But that’s a great thing to have to deal with. I mean, of all the problems I have, if you call this a problem, I’ll take it.

Steve Barger: Yeah, for sure. It’s a great problem to have. Did you — maybe I missed it. Did you throw out a CapEx number for the year?

Rob Sullivan: It is — to be in 3% to 3.5%.

Steve Barger: Got it. Okay. Thanks. Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question — our next question, I should say, is coming from Pete Skibitski from Alembic Global. Your line is now live.

Pete Skibitski: Hey, good morning, guys.

Michael Hartnett: Good morning, Pete.

Pete Skibitski: Maybe one for Rob. Hey, Rob, I think you said the free cash conversion target for ’26 as one times. You had this big receivables build here in the fourth quarter. I don’t know how fast you expect to collect on that, but it seems to the extent you can collect on that it’s pretty large that maybe 1 times conversion is kind of conservative unless you think as you grow here that fourth quarter will be kind of ongoing receivables delays. But I was wondering if you could give some color on that.

Rob Sullivan: Yeah. I mean the 1 times always our target. Hopefully, hopefully, we’ll beat it. We are continuing to grow sales. So, there’ll always be some of that pressure, but we’re going to do what we can to exceed that.

Pete Skibitski: Okay. fair enough. And then just on the CapEx profile, I guess maybe, Mike, if this reconciliation bill goes through and defense budgets grow well into the double digits, is that going to kind of set-off another CapEx cycle for you guys just given that’s a pretty, pretty big step-up in potential demand there. I don’t know what this current cycle kind of enables you for capacity wise.

Rob Sullivan: Yes, it will. And we actually are planning a five year kind of outlook for a couple of our plants and sort of what do we need for capital and how do we adjust Pete because when you look at — what, what the growth is going to be in some of those plants over the next five years, given sort of the A&D profile that we’re looking at, we have to act now to get ahead of it.

Pete Skibitski: Okay. Makes sense. Last one for me, just on I think Steve kind of asked about the SG&A investments. I think I might have missed some of it. Could you just update us on the timeline in terms of have you reached kind of peak incremental spend on some of the incremental IT investments and the India investments that you guys wanted to do. And so, I don’t know if we should expect some operating leverage at this point going forward or are you still kind of growing that investment and maybe what’s the return timeline on that?

Rob Sullivan: Yeah. So we’re continuing to invest in the growth. Obviously, we’re trying to grow the company at a healthy rate, but the key takeaway would be of that margin expansion that we’re seeking, we’re always aiming to see a good amount of that fall down to the EBITDA line. That’s the best way I’d frame it.

Pete Skibitski: Okay. Fair enough. Thanks guys.

Operator: Thank you. Next question is coming from Ross Sparenblek from William Blair. Your line is now live.

Ross Sparenblek: Good afternoon, guys.

Michael Hartnett: Hi, Ross.

Ross Sparenblek: Hey, on the defense guidance, I believe you guys said mid to high single digit plus for 2026. It seems like a generally broad range there. So, it’d be great to just gauge the sensitivity and what’s informing the lower end versus high end? Is it more just ramping capacity or is it kind of just customer timing.

Michael Hartnett: It’s probably ramping capacity, Ross. It’s — we’ve, we’ve are working our way through some pretty substantial contracts with the majors, both plane builders and the defense agencies the defense OEMs and so a lot of them are already booked or in process or late to book because of administrative delay on the other side. But it’s definitely going to be a capacity challenge for us.

Ross Sparenblek: Okay, understood. And then maybe just on industrial, can you just elaborate on some of the end-market dynamics there on the strength on the OEM side? You noted Dodge being strong, maybe just on the RBC classic.

Rob Moffatt: Hey, Ross, it’s Rob Moffatt. Just looking at the end markets, mining metals was our strongest. We’ve had a couple of decent quarters there. Aggregate and cement was number two and warehousing and logistics is an end market that has turned very nicely positive for us. Those are our top three contributors to growth.

Ross Sparenblek: Okay. So I mean, do — you can give the sense that the worst is kind of in the rearview here, oil and gas is still expected second half ’25. So maybe it’s more just a mix when we think about the first quarter margin — gross margin step-down or just strength in the OEM for RBC Classic?

Michael Hartnett: Yeah. You’re talking about the Q1 versus Q1 last year.

Ross Sparenblek: I think I would just point to the fact that Q1 last year was an exceptionally strong margin quarter. We had a nice product mix there coupled with some expedites that were flowing through, if you recall. So, I’d just kind of remind you that the overall implication for the Q1 margin is above the full year FY ’25 performance.

Rob Moffatt: Ross, if you’re thinking in terms of growth, I mean, we do still have headwinds in the oil and gas segment and the semiconductor end markets. I still think that those are going to turn. If you look at the strong performance that we had in industrial, it’s a lot of the things that Dr. Hartnett talked about earlier, organic growth initiatives, really strong performance at Dodge and picking up pockets of market share in different places. It’s the things that we focus on during ops that are driving that. More so than end markets.

Ross Sparenblek: Awesome. Thanks guys.

Operator: Thank you. Next question is coming from Jordan Lyonnais from Bank of America. Your line is now live.

Jordan Lyonnais: Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. I appreciate the comments on the debt repayment. But could you guys give a sense of what you’re seeing for M&A pipeline, has anything changed in the market for you or what’s coming up that you’d be interested in?

Michael Hartnett: Well, on M&A, I would say that first of all we’ve been working hard looking at alternatives and lots of alternatives and so we’ve been busy. And synergy is important to us in our aspects of selection and we’re very selective but we’re spending considerable amount of time here on, on candidates. And it does burden — it’s a big burden for the staff, let’s put it that way. We think progress is being made. We think the balance sheet is in good position to do something if we need to act. And if we do see something we like, we’ll act quickly.

Jordan Lyonnais: Great. Thank you so much.

Operator: Thank you. Next question today is coming from Kristine Liwag from Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your follow-up.

Kristine Liwag: I wanted to get back in queue, Mike, to check on your math, I know you’re really good at it, so I just want to make sure you didn’t forget but…

Michael Hartnett: Kristine, I thought — I always hoping you’d forget. This is the way my math, this is the way my math came out. And I’ll let you do it by — I did it by 10 plane-built rate for the 737, okay. A 10-plane rate annually would add about $24 million. For the 777 a five-plane rate would add $24 million. And for the 320 a 10-plane rate would add $12 million.

Kristine Liwag: Great. Wow, these are great numbers. And then, so thank you. So, I’ll do some number crunching and follow-up with you offline. But I was wondering, maybe since I’m back-in queue, another follow-up on the previous question on M&A. Speaking to some industry folks, I actually think that a lot of people are really surprised what you’re able to do with a Dodge asset, right? I mean, who would have thought, but by now industrial — your industrial business would be a few hundred basis points higher in gross margin than your aerospace defense business. So I guess, looking at — you’ve always had faith in your team, and you’ve had a pretty structured way of training on all your employees. But I think that kind of performance really surprised the industry in Dodge.

So, I was wondering, now that you have seen the size, I mean doubling your revenue and getting over 1,000 basis points in margin within 18 months of ownership. These are all pretty spectacular accomplishments really on operations. I was wondering, does that give you more confidence? Does that widen your aperture regarding deals you could look at, at assets that you think you can turn around or extract more value from? And also, when you look at your priorities for that balance sheet at 1.7 times net debt EBITDA, you do have a lot of runway and with your organic business, you don’t need to acquire, but can you give us some sort of a guidance regarding what kind of assets would be interesting to you? Is it more industrial, is it more aerospace defense?

Like are there some sort of milestones or markers either in size or proprietary content that we can kind of follow. Thanks.

Michael Hartnett: Sure. Well certainly on the aerospace defense side we like companies that sell to our customers because the customers in that sphere are very sophisticated. The terms and conditions are very difficult and time consuming to negotiate. And so, if you, if you have a customer where you’ve negotiated your terms and you have — you understand how the customer makes decisions and you know the people at the account and how they think and you have the account covered with marketing people that are have been servicing the account for a decade. You feel pretty comfortable in a company that looking at a company that services that account too. So, you can quickly identify what the company’s position is, what its reputation is, how it goes to market, how it prices its product, so on and so forth.

So that’s part of the profile that we really like. And that also would add scale at that account to us, which overall helps in your statement of work. So, that checks a big box, and we like that box checked. And when it comes to making things, we have — I don’t know, probably more than 1,000 engineers that know how to make stuff. And they’re very good at manufacturing processes so our ability to absorb the manufacturing world for the target is very high ability and so if they’re doing something that we can improve, we can identify it right away and we can bring in the right specialist that deals with that particular aspect of manufacturing and sort of off we go. And so, there’s nothing for us, there’s nothing scary about it. And it’s — and it takes a lot of risk-off the table at the same time.

You know the account, you know the manufacturing, you know the plant efficiencies, you know what you can do to improve the plant efficiencies, maybe what the pricing mechanism is different than maybe you would want to — you would price. So you can — you can see a long way say when there’s candidates that have that kind of a profile.

Kristine Liwag: Great. Thank you.

Michael Hartnett: Yeah.

Operator: Thank you. We’ve reached end of our question-and-answer session. I’d like to turn the floor back over for any further or closing comments.

Michael Hartnett: Okay. Well, I have no more comments. I think I’m pretty much commented out. But I appreciate everybody participating today and there was a lot of good questions. I hope we gave you good answers and we look-forward to talking to you later in the summer. Thank you, David.

Operator: Thank you. That does conclude today’s teleconference and webcast. You may disconnect your lines at this time and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.