Piper Sandler Companies (NYSE:PIPR) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Piper Sandler Companies (NYSE:PIPR) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript August 1, 2025

Piper Sandler Companies beats earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $2.95, expectations were $1.99.

Operator: Good morning, and welcome to the Piper Sandler Company’s Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Today’s call is being recorded and will include remarks by Piper Sandler management, followed by a question-and-answer session. I’ll begin by turning the call over to Kate Winslow. Please go ahead.

Kathy Winslow: Thank you, operator. Good morning, and thank you for joining the Piper Sandler Company’s Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Hosting the call today are Chairman and CEO, Chad Abraham; our President, Deb Schoneman, and CFO, Kate Clune. Earlier this morning, we issued a press release announcing Piper Sandler’s Second Quarter 2025 financial results, which is available on our website at pipersandler.com/earnings. Today’s discussion of the results is complementary to the press release. A replay of this call will also be available at that same website later today. Before we begin, let me remind you that remarks made on today’s call may contain forward-looking statements that are not historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, and involve inherent risks and uncertainties.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated are identified in the company’s reports on file with the SEC which are available on our website at pipersandler.com and on the SEC website at sec.gov. Today’s discussion also includes statements regarding certain non-GAAP financial measures that management believes are meaningful when evaluating the company’s performance. The non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to and not a substitute for measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure is provided in our earnings release issued today. I will now turn the call over to Chad.

Chad R. Abraham: Thank you, Kate. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining our second quarter 2025 earnings call. When we spoke with you after the first quarter, the macro environment was challenging, and the second quarter began with uncertainty and persistent volatility. By mid-May, market sentiment shifted, equity markets recovered and confidence improved. As a more constructive outlook took hold, client engagement across businesses gained momentum. As a result, we closed the second quarter with adjusted net revenues of $405 million an 18.1% operating margin and adjusted EPS of $2.95, all higher compared to the same period last year. Advisory revenues were $206 million during the quarter, up 12% year-over- year, driven by our broad set of products and a higher average fee.

We completed 71 transactions during the period, up compared to the second quarter of last year. Performance was led by our Services and Industrials group, which delivered 1 of their best quarters since 2021. The strong performance of our services and industrials team reflects the continued addition of high-quality talent that focuses on sub verticals, important to our clients. During the first half of 2025, advisory revenues were $423 million, up 24% compared to the year ago period. This growth was driven by higher revenues from M&A as well as increased non-M&A revenues, which include debt advisory, private capital advisory and restructuring. Our investments in non-M&A advisory capabilities continue to gain traction as total revenues from these product lines grew at a rate in excess of our overall advisory revenues.

Q&A Session

We have strategically expanded our industry and product capabilities, which has not only deepened client relationships, but also enhanced our ability to deliver comprehensive advice throughout the entire market cycle. For example, our debt advisory team has been very active, and we continue to experience strong demand for their services. Our best-in- class team, which leverages deep industry expertise and strong lending relationships is delivering effective solutions for our clients. Overall, our market leadership, broad industry coverage and product capabilities continue to drive strong relative performance. Diversification from both a sector and product perspective, benefited us during the first half of 2025 even as the number of completed middle market M&A transactions declined year-over-year.

Although volatility early in the quarter impacted some deal processes, the outlook for advisory services has improved. We have a robust pipeline of announced and in-process transactions, and we expect our third quarter advisory revenues to be largely consistent with the second quarter. Turning to corporate financing. Revenues were $35 million during the second quarter, down 31% from the year ago period. We completed 26 financings, raising $10 billion for corporate clients. Performance was driven by financial services. The team served as bookrunner on 14 of the 17 deals completed for financial services clients, which accounted for over half of our corporate financing revenues. While we’re encouraged that corporate financing activity is improving in certain areas, other areas continue to be impacted by sector-specific factors.

For the first half of the year, the economic fee pool for companies with sub-$5 billion of market cap decreased 19% year-over- year. Within that, some core sectors were down more meaningfully such as a 61% decline in the economic fee pool for biopharma companies. As we look ahead, our pipeline remains strong and diverse, and we’re pleased the third quarter is off to a good start. Shifting to talent. We finished the quarter with 182 managing directors, consistent with first quarter levels and up 7% from a year ago. During the quarter, we hired 5 MDs to strengthen both sector and product expertise. These hires will strengthen our coverage in biopharma, insurance and technology and enhance our secondary capital advisory and debt advisory capabilities.

The additions were offset by some reductions in force actions, which reflect our ongoing focus on broader talent management. We remain intentional about strategically managing headcount and driving productivity while looking for opportunities to strengthen our platform. Overall, our second quarter results were strong and we are pleased with our performance. As we look ahead, we are entering the back half of the year with solid momentum and are well positioned to gain share. With that, I will turn the call over to Deb to discuss our public finance and brokerage businesses.

Debbra Lynn Schoneman: Thanks, Chad. I’ll begin with an update on our public finance business. Market conditions remained favorable during the second quarter, driven by growing infrastructure needs, relatively stable borrowing conditions and strong investor demand due to higher yields. These dynamics led issuers to more actively access the market. For the second quarter of 2025, we generated $42 million of municipal financing revenues, up 66% year-over-year, exceeding the market issuance growth in par value of 15%. Activity was robust across both our governmental and specialty sectors with strong performance attributable to the breadth of our client and geographic reach. Performance was broad-based across several of our leading franchises, including those in Kansas and California as well as our special district and health care groups.

Looking ahead, we have a robust pipeline, yet expect third quarter revenues to moderate from the very strong second quarter. Now turning to our brokerage businesses. After a sharp selloff in April, the equity markets recovered with major indices reaching all- time highs. Equity brokerage generated $58 million of revenues for the second quarter of 2025, an increase of 12% year-over-year. We traded 2.9 billion shares on behalf of over 1,200 unique clients as we assisted clients in navigating the heightened volatility and rapidly changing landscape. Additionally, activity has been robust on our derivatives desk. We have consistently grown the number of clients and revenue per client on our derivatives desk through our strategic focus on enhancing client relationships and delivering tailored solutions.

We expect revenues to moderate from second quarter levels as volatility has normalized with the VIX declining to 17 at the end of June. Lastly, turning to fixed income. We generated $54 million of revenues for the second quarter of 2025, up 21% from the first quarter and 37% from the year ago period, driven by robust activity with our depository clients. Notably, we completed several large balance sheet restructuring trades in conjunction with the closing of bank M&A transactions. While engagement is high and the team continues to provide differentiated advice, activity with nondepository clients has been subdued caused by spread tightening and relative value concerns. The combination of potential Fed rate cuts and a steepening yield curve should continue to enhance client engagement and activity.

However, given our strong second quarter, we anticipate fixed income revenues to soften in the third quarter. Now I will turn the call over to Kate to review our financial results and provide an update on capital use.

Katherine Patricia Clune: Thanks, Deb. Before reviewing our non-GAAP financial results, let me discuss an item impacting our GAAP results this quarter. For the second quarter of 2025, our GAAP results include a $5 million restructuring charge related to headcount reductions as well as vacated office space associated with our acquisition of Aviditi Advisors. Turning now to our adjusted non-GAAP financial results, which should be considered in addition to and not a substitute for the corresponding GAAP financial measures. We generated net revenues of $405 million for the second quarter of 2025. Operating income was $73 million, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%. We delivered $53 million of net income and $2.95 of diluted EPS.

For the first half of 2025, net revenues totaled $789 million, operating income amounted to $142 million, and our operating margin was 18%. We generated $126 million of net income and $7.04 of diluted EPS. Net revenues for the second quarter of 2025 increased 6% from the first quarter of this year, and 14% compared to the second quarter of last year, driven primarily by strong activity in our municipal financing and institutional brokerage businesses. In addition, we benefited from increased advisory services revenues compared to the year ago quarter. Net revenues for the first half of 2025 increased 14% over last year, driven by advisory services, which accounted for 54% of total net revenues and increased 24% year-over-year. Additionally, our municipal financing and equity brokerage businesses both delivered record revenues for the first half period.

Turning to expenses. We reported a compensation ratio of 62% for the second quarter of 2025 and 62.2% for the first half of the year, an improvement from the comparable period, driven by increased net revenues. We remain committed to exercising operating discipline and balancing employee retention and strategic investment opportunities. For the second quarter of 2025 non-compensation expenses, excluding reimbursed deal costs, were $69 million, consistent with the first quarter and increased 6% year-over-year, driven by higher legal fees as well as increased professional fees associated with technology and consulting services. Noncompensation costs for the first half of 2025 excluding reimbursed deal expenses, totaled $139 million, an increase of 10% compared to the first half of last year.

Moving to income tax expense. Our income tax rate in the quarter was 28.1% and 11% for the first half of the year. Income tax expense for the year-to-date period was reduced by $26 million of tax benefits related to the vesting of restricted stock awards. Excluding the $26 million of benefits, our effective tax rate for the year-to-date period was 29.6%. Now finishing with capital. During the quarter, we repurchased approximately 85,000 shares or $21 million of our common stock and paid an aggregate of $17 million to shareholders through our quarterly dividend. For the first half of this year, we returned an aggregate of $189 million to shareholders. This includes repurchases of approximately 351,000 shares or $102 million of our common stock, primarily related to employee tax withholdings on the vesting of restricted stock awards.

It also includes an aggregate of $87 million or $4.30 per share paid to shareholders through our quarterly and special cash dividends. Lastly, I’m pleased to announce that effective today, the Board approved a $0.05 increase to our quarterly cash dividend to $0.70 per share. The dividend will be paid on September 12 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 29.

Chad R. Abraham: Thanks, Kate. Before taking questions, let me close with a few remarks on our acquisition announcement from earlier this morning. We’ve entered into a definitive agreement to acquire G Squared Capital Partners, a boutique investment bank, specializing in government services and defense technology. The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2025. Based in Washington D.C. area, G. Squared consists of 10 professionals, including 3 managing directors. The pending acquisition will further the growth of our technology investment banking group by combining their deep government sector experience with our cybersecurity and broader technology expertise as well as our strong access and relevance to private equity.

In addition, we will provide G Squared access to our full suite of product capabilities to better serve their clients. This transaction is consistent with the strategic goal we’ve articulated previously, to continue growing our M&A business and technology. With that, we can now open up the call for questions.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] And we’ll move right to Devin Ryan with Citizens.

Devin Patrick Ryan: Great. Good morning, everyone. First question on consolidation in the depository space. Obviously, the Sandler team has been active in the nonbank space over the last few years, which is good. But starting to see some bank M&A finally, and you guys are obviously starting to participate in that as well. I just want to get a sense of how you would frame what a more normal bank consolidation market could mean for revenue for Paper? And then just in terms of what you’re seeing the timing? Do you think that there’s revenues potentially for this year ramping? Or is this much more of a 2026 story and how you would frame that piece as well?

Chad R. Abraham: Yes. I do think the conditions have continued to improve for depository M&A obviously. Credit has been pretty good. There’s capital available if that needs to be part of transactions. We’re definitely seeing proof of regulatory approvals being quicker, yes. And I would say our pace of announcements has increased kind of across the spectrum, the small deals, a few of the larger deals. I do think some of these will — some of the stuff because it’s closing faster will close later in the year, but I still think we’ll feel a lot of this impact next year. But conversations are good. And it’s — honestly, it’s hard to — besides the fact that a lot of the bank stock prices haven’t recovered quite as much. it’s hard to imagine much of the other criteria being a lot better.

Devin Patrick Ryan: Got it. Okay. And then a follow-up here on Aviditi and just kind of the private capital solutions. So almost 1 year post closing, It’d be great just to hear about how that business is enhancing connectivity with clients now that you’ve kind of been connected for some time in the go-to-market, I’m sure, kind of pretty well developed right now. So can you just talk about how it’s improving connectivity with clients. And then is there more that you can do there, meaning if you added a lot more resources or are there any capabilities you’re learning you still might need to add for your sponsor clients?

Chad R. Abraham: Yes, I would say, honestly, that transaction has worked out sort of exactly as we had hoped. Just as a reminder, they’ve got a couple of large parts of the business, actually a few parts of the business, but new fund and existing fund raising and then obviously, the secondary market, they were heavily weighted sort of new capital raising, we did recently announced a significant hire to help just with more teams helping on the secondary side. I think what I’ve been really pleasantly surprised with is just the depth of relationships when you’re raising money for a particular fund you’re dealing with the senior partners, the decision makers, and I think that helps across all types of transactions. It helps us tell our story about our debt advisory business.

It helps us on sell-side M&A. So relative to other things we’ve done, I think we’ve had quite a bit of pickup. And certainly, quicker than other things in terms of the bankers really locking on to this as an opportunity. So I think our timing was good. Transactions are picking up. And frankly, the results have been pretty good. So we’re very pleased with how that’s going.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] We move next to James Yaro with Goldman Sachs.

James Edwin Yaro: Chad, I was hoping you might be able to touch a little bit on the IPO backdrop as we look ahead. And perhaps if you could also comment, specifically on biotech. Any color you could offer on the scale of the pipelines and perhaps contextualize that versus history for the broader IPOs as well as biotech.

Chad R. Abraham: Yes. So I honestly think that question is really the tale of 2 cities. We’re — relative to the IPO market, these are off of a few years that were really slow. So — but we’re definitely seeing a pickup. And I can just really comment on some of the sectors we’re pretty active in, we had a few years where we didn’t see many IPOs in medtech, and now we’ve been this year on 4 or 5 IPOs in medtech, which is great to see. Obviously, we’ve heavily invested in insurance. We’ve been on a few great transactions there. So the backdrop, the conditions, the performance of some of these deals, I do think that continues to set up for continued improvement in the IPO market. I would say relative to biotech, I mean, part of the reason our financing business has been down as we we’re heavily weighted to health care and obviously weighted to biotech.

And that people has been way down, frankly, follow-ons, but especially IPOs, I mean I can’t recall, but it’s been a while since we’ve seen a biotech IPO. So those are always kind of different markets. So I’d say — in general, the IPO market is improving. In general, we were off in July here. We’ve done some nice transactions in biotech, but it’s coming off of a slow pace. And so I think we’re going to need to see continued improvement before that hits the biotech IPO market.

James Edwin Yaro: That’s very clear. Just a second question, I’d just like to parse the constructive bank M&A tone versus the weaker 3Q fixed income trading commentary and perhaps it’s just a timing issue. But some thoughts there? And then maybe also just on bank underwriting. So specifically, how does the weaker fixed income trading square with the improving bank M&A backdrop? And then if you could just comment on the outlook for bank, equity and debt underwriting.

Debbra Lynn Schoneman: Yes. I’ll start, James, with the fixed income side. So I would say it’s a little more of just having a really strong Q2 than seeing anything that might seem inconsistent with the commentary that Chad made on bank M&A. One of the things with our restructuring business. And we did have a very strong — a couple of strong — very large transactions in the second quarter. For example, we had a transaction — a restructuring transaction that was over $2.5 billion in par relative to both the buys and sells. So very large. I just — it’s more about coming off that strong second quarter. As we think about restructuring going forward, there’s 2 pieces. One is maybe more a little bit tougher to predict, which is part of what’s in our comments relative to restructuring.

It is true that as M&A picks up, we will see and are seeing more of that activity. It’s just a little difficult to predict exactly when that will happen. There’s a more predictable side to restructuring that we see more seasonality around building into Q4. So if that answers your question, if you need more clarity, but I would say it’s just more the strong second quarter.

Chad R. Abraham: Yes. And the second part of your question, about just capital raising and DCM. We’re definitely seeing a pickup there. With banks we did a lot of this financing 5 years ago, a lot of that paper rolls off. And frankly, the terms just and coupons continue to get better, and we have very high market share there. So we commented that a good chunk of what we did do in financings came from FSG this quarter. So we expect that to continue.

James Edwin Yaro: Really helpful. And just to be clear, Deb, when you say restructuring, you mean balance sheet restructuring within fixed income right?

Debbra Lynn Schoneman: Sorry, yes. Yes, that’s what I’m thinking about. Yes.

Operator: We’ll go next to Brendan O’Brien with Wolfe Research.

Brendan James O’Brien: Just wanted to ask on the sponsor environment, just given the increased pressure to return capital to LPs, trends seem to have been improving of late. But I just want to get a sense as to how you would characterize the conversations you’re having with your sponsor clients at the moment. Has there been any shifts in the tenor of those discussions over the past few weeks even, it feels like we’re starting to see some acceleration there.

Chad R. Abraham: Yes. I mean, obviously, we’ve said it’s coming several times. And I would say the data is a little bit better but not a lot better. I would say I’ve been out with sponsors a lot the last month and everybody seems pretty active. I do think there’s a lot of transactions that have launched. I think relative to sort of process, people are still being careful, but I absolutely believe we’re going to see a nice pickup in the back half and into next year, although I agree it’s probably been a little slower than we thought.

Brendan James O’Brien: That’s helpful color. And then I guess for my follow-up question, more of a bigger picture one. Now that we’re on our way or entering what feels like a recovery, obviously, depending on how things react today and over the next few weeks with the trade deals, but now that we’re on the path towards recovery, I just want to get a sense as to your confidence in your ability to hit that $2 billion investment banking target that you outlined prior to the slowdown and how to think about the trajectory of the building blocks from here.

Chad R. Abraham: Yes. I mean every time I talk about that, that’s really just related to sort of the diversity of the business and seeing within each of those industry teams where our pockets are to grow, and we continue to invest in that. Obviously, we’ve talked a lot about technology. We did a small transaction today. Super complementary to our cyber and security practice gets us a new office in D.C. I think there’s just multiple verticals and things like that, that we’re having success with. We talked a lot about our services and industrial business, which we felt, with the team we hired in Michigan, frankly, that has a lot of traction. So I think we’re still on the brick-by-brick strategy with opportunity in every industry team.

I’m always careful not to get pinned into a corner like exactly how many years is that going to take. But I think we have even more conviction as time goes by relative to each industry team where we’re going to see the growth, where we’re going to add the MDs, and we still believe we’ll see some increased productivity because even though we’re growing revenues, we’re still not happy with the total productivity levels.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] We’ll move next to Mike Grondahl with Northland Securities.

Michael John Grondahl: Congrats on a strong quarter. First question, just, Chad, your health care advisory outlook, kind of what are you seeing there?

Chad R. Abraham: Yes. If you remember, relative to advisory, Healthcare was our only team that was down last year. It’s been quite strong this year, probably our team that’s up the most in advisory, which has had a big part of the improvement. So I think that’s really twofold. Coming off of a very slow year, different regulatory environment that people are willing to try sort of not completely, but mostly tariff proof relative to a lot of domestic businesses, a lot of service businesses. So we’re having a very good year in health care advisory.

Michael John Grondahl: Got it. And then within that overall advisory, could you kind of describe a debt advisory transaction in a private capital market transaction. Just I want to better understand those 2 areas as that area along with restructuring is growing a lot.

Chad R. Abraham: Yes. We — obviously, we sort of called out — we really look at the non-M&A advisory business as Capital Advisory, which we already talked about, debt advisory and restructuring, our pure sort of agented debt advisory has been one of the fastest-growing parts of the firm over the last 4 or 5 years, a lot of that has to do with all the alternative sources for capital with various credit funds. And so a typical transaction, obviously, there’s never a typical transaction, but all types of transactions relative to financing to a sponsor to do an acquisition, financing to a sponsor to recap, financing that they have adding sort of add-on capital, all sorts of things, sometimes sort of exclusive to 1 buyer. Sometimes there’s a couple of buyers, but it’s — there’s just been an explosion of various providers of credit, and that’s been very good for our business because it’s also it’s hard for companies.

They used to have to access capital with 10 or 12 banks. Now there’s several hundred funds, and I would say we’ve got that same success with certain private equity funds. Obviously, the really large ones have their own capital markets teams, but a lot of the mid-market, small capital markets groups, they may not have professionals there. So we’ve got several funds where we do all of their transactions, whatever the debt capital requirement is. And then the other part of the debt business, which I think you asked about. In our FSG business, we do some sort of underwritten, but we do a lot of agented debt business. A lot of this bank business we just talked about is sold to other financial institutions, depositories, other types of financial institutions.

It’s usually sort of 5-year paper, a lot of the banks, other financial institutions sort of have that paper. A lot of times, they’re just rolling that over with other financing. Sometimes it’s new capital.

Michael John Grondahl: Congratulations.

Operator: We’ll return to James Yaro with Goldman Sachs.

James Edwin Yaro: I just wanted to touch a little bit more on the comp and noncomp expenses. On the comp side, how would you think about the comp ratio trajectory from here now that you’re comfortably within, I think, your target range? And on the noncomp dollar side, growth ex reimbursable expenses has been a bit higher than I think you previously talked about. So maybe just any update on how we should think about full year non-comp expenses.

Katherine Patricia Clune: So thanks for the question, James. Starting on the comp ratio side, again, we continue to focus on that balance of driving leverage and then ensuring that we’re also investing where those opportunities arise with the improved revenue this quarter, it allowed us to drive for that leverage that you referenced and we’d expect for the remainder of the year to be in this range without providing any sort of specific figure. To your point, we’re kind of right in between our 61.5% to 62.5% sort of normalizing range for comp ratio. So feeling good about that. And that’s really barring any significant outsized investments or kind of turn in the market conditions. Just to take a moment on noncomps. You’re right, we are trending a bit above kind of that increased guided range that we provided for this year.

I think about 3 material drivers there. One is the large occupancy expense increase that we have telegraphed out there, and that has to do with the relocation of our headquarters here in Minneapolis. As we talked about at the end of the first quarter, T&E running a little bit ahead of where we had expected. Some of that just has to do with more people on the platform, higher cost of travel, et cetera. That has moderated a bit, although it does run a little bit ahead of where we thought we would still be kind of on a year-to-date basis. Then the third category that I think is really what’s driving the differential as we referenced in the script for this quarter is kind of professional and legal fees. Legal fees, I think about in 2 categories.

One is just sort of standard legal fees that come with running the business a little bit ahead of where we expected. The other is a little bit more of a legal expense associated with some of our ECM transactions given the ECM volatility we saw at the beginning of the period here. We aren’t adjusting that range. I think we’ll be sort of between where we are here and the higher end of the range that we have provided for the remainder of the year, but we’ll certainly update that guidance, if anything changes.

Operator: At this time, we have no further questions. I’d like to turn the floor back to Chad for any additional or closing remarks.

Chad R. Abraham: Okay. Thanks to everyone that joined us this morning. We look forward to updating you on our third quarter results. Have a great day.

Operator: This concludes today’s conference. We thank you for your participation. You may disconnect your lines at this time.