PHINIA Inc. (NYSE:PHIN) Q4 2023 Earnings Call Transcript

PHINIA Inc. (NYSE:PHIN) Q4 2023 Earnings Call Transcript February 21, 2024

PHINIA Inc. isn’t one of the 30 most popular stocks among hedge funds at the end of the third quarter (see the details here).

Operator: Good morning. My name is Brianna and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I’d like to welcome everyone to the PHINIA Q4 2023 Earnings Conference Call. Please note that today’s call is being recorded. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I will now turn the call over to Michael Heifler, PHINIA Investor Relations. You may begin your conference.

Michael Heifler: Thank you, Brianna, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us. Our conference call materials were issued this morning and are available on PHINIA’s Investor Relations website, including a slide deck that we will be referencing in our remarks. We are also broadcasting this call via webcast. Joining us today are Brady Ericson, CEO; Chris Gropp, CFO. Today, we will discuss our Q4 and full-year 2023 results and forecasts for 2024. Please keep in mind when we make year-over-year or second-half 2023 to first-half 2023 comparisons, we are comparing our standalone results, including actual or expected corporate costs to pro forma results with corporate allocations when we were part of BorgWarner. During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements, which are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties.

Actual results may differ materially from these statements due to a variety of factors, including those described in our SEC filings. And with that, it’s my pleasure to turn the call over to Brady.

Brady Ericson: Thanks, Mike. Thank you all for joining this morning. I’d like to thank our more than 13,000 employees who remain focused on delivering quality products to our customers and making our first six months as an independent public company successful. I’d also like to thank our customers who’ve been highly supportive and have been awarding us new business at a record pace. I’ll get into some of those numbers shortly and then hand it over to Chris for more details. But first, let me provide an update on our journey so far. As I mentioned in our last call, I continue to spend considerable time with our customers, employees, and investors. The feedback has been overwhelmingly supportive and positive about PHINIA’s focus on its core business and strategy for the future.

A vessel being refueled at a port from a fuel logistics tanker.

Customers appreciate our commitment to combustion products and that we will be a reliable partner for them for decades to come. They are aligned with our efforts to develop robust practical solutions for today and the carbon-neutral and carbon-free solutions of tomorrow. Our employees are excited that the profits and resources are being reinvested in our product lines and operations to further strengthen and grow our business. Finally, our investors are supportive of our strategy, commitment to being financially disciplined and our focus on total shareholder returns. Continuing to deliver solid financial performance and executing on our strategies will be key to building shareholder confidence. Along these lines, we are separately announcing today that our compensation committee has approved the company’s 2024 incentive compensation program that we believe will best align our leadership team with shareholders’ interest.

As I’ve been sharing since our Investor Day last year, we are managing the business with a laser focus on generating economic value, or EV, and free cash flow. The 2024 annual cash incentive will be based on the company’s achievement of two equally weighted performance metrics; EV and free cash flow. This program sends a clear message throughout our organization that investment decisions are made through the lens of earning an adequate return on capital. Our 2024 long-term equity incentive will be solely based on the company’s relative total shareholder returns compared to that of a peer group company. We have filed a separate 8-K this morning with more details. Now let’s go ahead and jump to the fourth quarter highlights on Slide 4. I’m pleased to share that we ended 2023 on a strong note.

Chris and I challenged a team to find incremental efficiencies and with their efforts, along with lower than expected impact from the strikes of North America and less of a currency headwind than expected, we came in at the top end of our revenue range and above our revised guidance range for an adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin perspective. Chris will provide more specifics later. Providing great products and service for our customers have allowed — has allowed us to continue to win new business across all product lines and in all regions in support of our strategies. A few examples from Q4 on Slide 5. PHINIA secured new conquest business to supply a GDI fuel system to a leading OEM, specializing in hybrid and low-emission powertrain technology in the light vehicle segment.

PHINIA won a contract extension to supply heavy-duty diesel fuel systems to a leading global OEM, securing revenue in our core commercial vehicle segment. And PHINIA achieved an important business win to supply medium-duty diesel systems to a leading global OEM, retaining and expanding our incumbent revenue. Now let’s move to Slide 6. We accomplished a lot in 2023 from the successful spin, the strong operational performance. One area I want to highlight is our performance on securing our long-term future. In 2023, we had robust quote activity and strong win rates. When we were the incumbent, we won over 90% of the time. When trying to win conquest business, we won over 60% of the time. In total, approximately 40% of our business wins in 2023 were conquest.

Our objective to increase market share to offset market headwinds is working well and I’m very pleased with our results. With these gains in our significant exposure to commercial vehicle, industrial and aftermarket businesses, we see continued organic growth through this decade and beyond. Finally, since becoming independent, we returned $47 million to our shareholders via dividends and share repurchases. Now, looking to 2024, we see the momentum continuing. Regarding the transition from our former parent, we now believe we are several months ahead of our original timeline and we expect that we will be exiting all material transitional service agreements, or TSAs by the end of summer. We’re also planning to exit all contract manufacturing agreements or CMAs with our former parent by the end of Q2 in a stepped and managed fashion.

We will also be launching several key new technologies that will help our customers improve efficiency and reduce the CO2 output of their engines. We’ve also made progress on our corporate costs and are now confident that we will achieve our original target of $80 million per year or $20 million per quarter, as we are nearly fully staffed and most of the service and support contracts have been finalized. Our constant drive for efficiency and improvement across all areas of our business, operations, supply chain, engineering, corporate and even opportunistically refinancing our debt on more favorable terms is what will allow us to continue to return capital to our shareholders and drive long-term shareholder value. As you can see on Slide 7 and 8, our focus remains on growing our CV, industrial and aftermarket business, while optimizing our light vehicle OE business.

We remain aligned and confident in achieving our 2030 revenue target of $5 billion, with greater than 70% of our revenues coming from CV, Industrial and OES independent aftermarket channels. On Slide 9, we will execute on our strategies in a very disciplined manner in order to maximize shareholder returns by utilizing our ROIC-based investment analysis. In other words, efficient and profitable growth, not just growth. Capital return to our shareholders will continue to be a key part of our plan to maximize shareholder value. And finally, maintaining our strong balance sheet and liquidity ensures we will be a consistent and reliable company for all of our stakeholders. This leads us to my last Slide on Page 10. Given our strategies and execution thus far, we remain confident we will be able to deliver an average organic growth rate through the decade in the 2% to 4% range.

We plan to do this in a disciplined way by maintaining strong margins and cash flow, all while maintaining appropriate leverage. We believe our business is resilient, with about a third of our revenue coming from the OES and independent aftermarket channel, which generally performs well even in poor economic conditions. Our commercial and industrial business, making up nearly a quarter of our sales, provides a stable growing opportunity. And in the light vehicle segment, we see our increasing market share and higher market penetration rates of GDI, especially in hybrids, supporting our position that our light vehicle business has staying power. With that, I’d like to pass it over to Chris to dive deeper into Q4 and full-year 2023 results and our 2024 guide.

Chris Gropp: Thanks, Brady, and good morning, everyone. I also want to thank our team for their extraordinary efforts this year and their hard work in closing out 2023 on a positive note. As we discuss our results and outlook, please keep in mind, there continue to be TSAs and CMAs with our former parent which we are rapidly phasing out. Also, we continue to work with them on balance sheet items related to the spin and expect it will take the next few quarters for operational payables and receivables to and from them to close out. In Q4 2023, we generated $858 million in adjusted total sales, up slightly versus a year ago. Our adjusted earnings per share were $0.71. We earned $89 million in adjusted operating income and $127 million of adjusted EBITDA, resulting in an adjusted operating margin of 10.4% and an adjusted EBITDA margin of 14.8%, a year-over-year decrease of 80 basis points and 20 basis points, respectively.

These results were meaningfully better than what we expected going into the quarter for the following reasons. The impact from the North American strikes only reduced our revenue by $5 million in the quarter, which was less than we had anticipated. We had strong commercial recoveries and cost controls and a somewhat lower headwind from currencies as the dollar softened in the quarter. Let me now bridge our revenue which you can find on Page 12 of the deck we made available on our website. Our sales performance in the quarter was affected by continued softness in our CV business in China. Volume mix was a headwind of $20 million, mostly due to lower CV sales in China as I just mentioned. We saw favorable sales from positive customer pricing, an inflation pass-through of $12 million and FX was a $15 million tailwind in the quarter.

As we move to Slide 13, the teams managed their business well as volume mix impact was only $3 million, or approximately a 15% downside conversion. We also had additional supplier savings to help improve our results, offset by $19 million of inflationary costs from suppliers. As a reminder from the prior page on the sales bridge, we recovered $12 million of inflation from our customers for recovery of just under 70% in the quarter, all in a good Q4 result. Slides 14 and 15 summarize the full year. Volume and mix upside conversion was light due to mix. We recovered over 70% of supplier inflationary costs from our customers and drove additional efficiencies from our supply base. From a core business performance standpoint, our segments reported overall solid margins.

Q4 segment adjusted operating margins were healthy at 12.6%, exceeding our first nine months performance by 90 basis points as our aftermarket segment rebounded from depressed margins in Q3 on the back of strong cost controls, strengthen sales in Europe and price. Looking at our performance on a segment level, Q4 fuel systems margins, while strong at 10.3% contracted somewhat on a year-over-year basis due to lower CV sales in China and partially due to supplier inflationary cost recoveries from our customers. On the supplier front, as we have mentioned, we are making strong progress and will see some benefit in 2024 from resourcing and/or settlements. Our aftermarket business adjusted operating margin recovered from a weak Q3, coming in at 16.3%, still down 40 basis points from the same period a year ago as non-commodity inflationary costs were not recovered by prior pricing actions and we experienced weaker mix.

Corporate costs were well controlled, coming in at $19 million. We continue to expect approximately $20 million in quarterly corporate costs going forward. Q4 cash from operations was $62 million. During the quarter, we generated adjusted free cash flow of $55 million. I’m particularly proud of the team for focusing on inventory efficiency. We reduced overall inventory by $42 million from the end of Q3. We continue to see an opportunity to further improve our working capital going forward as we institutionalize inventory optimization programs, exit the CMAs, and complete production realignments. Next, turning to liquidity. We are committed to a strong financial foundation and have ample liquidity to run our business and execute our strategy.

We ended the year with $365 million in cash and $425 million of committed revolver availability, giving us total liquidity of more than $790 million and net leverage of less than 1 times EBITDA. Now, let’s look at 2024. I’ll share our guidance, assumptions, and insights into our expected performance starting on Slide 16. From a market perspective on the OE side, industrywide CV volumes in 2024 are expected to decline by mid to high single digits in North America and Europe, while other global CV markets are expected to be flat to up slightly. Global LV volumes are expected to be down low single digits with engine production declining mid-single digits. Our good performance in 2023 has set the stage for the coming year and beyond. We expect strong earnings and cash generation in 2024 as we continue to drive operational efficiencies, exit agreements with our former parent and grow our aftermarket sales.

Now let’s move to Slide 17. For 2024, we expect adjusted sales of $3.4 billion to $3.55 billion, down 1% to up 3% in a difficult market environment. Market headwinds are being offset by our resilient and growing aftermarket and market share gains on the OE side. We expect adjusted EBITDA of $470 million to $510 million and adjusted EBITDA margins of 13.8% to 14.4%. For year-over-year comparisons, we would assume corporate costs of $80 million for 2023 rather than the $64 million related to carve-out accounting. This gives us a 2023 starting point of $3.45 billion in revenue, $474 million in EBITDA, and a 13.7% EBITDA margin. In 2024, we expect aftermarket growth, inflationary cost pressure reduction and resolution of troubled supplier issues to offset lower CV volumes in North America and Europe.

PHINIA expects to generate $160 million to $200 million in adjusted free cash flow. Our adjusted tax rate is expected to be between 28% to 32% as we continue to work on reducing this to at or below 20% over the next couple of years. In closing, I want to reiterate Brady’s message regarding our focus on financial discipline and generating strong shareholder returns. And with that, we’ll now move to the Q&A portion of our call.

Brady Ericson: Brianna, can you queue up our questions, please?

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Jake Scholl with BNP Paribas. Your line is open.

See also Goldman Sachs Penny Stocks: Top 12 Stock Picks and 13 Best Falling Stocks To Buy Right Now.

Q&A Session

Jake Scholl: Hey, guys. Congratulations on the great quarter.

Brady Ericson: Thanks, Jake.

Jake Scholl: First, I just want to dig in a little bit on the cash flow, so I think that — I think everyone will agree that’s a pretty healthy number. So can you talk a little bit about your capital allocation priorities for the year? You’re already at that sub 1 times net leverage target, so how should we quantify your buyback expectations? And then can you just help us bracket the separation-related charges that are embedded in that guide?

Brady Ericson: I guess on the first on the capital allocation side of things, obviously, we’re in a net debt position that we like and we want to continue to maintain that. And that’s going to give us a lot of opportunities to apply our free capital in other locations. As we did in Q4, we continued to accelerate our repurchase program and we continue to see stock repurchases as a key element to driving shareholder value. We’re going to continue to opportunistically purchase shares, as we also look at additional organic and inorganic opportunities. And so, we’ll look at where we can optimize ROIC for any of those capital allocations. The second?

Chris Gropp: Was cash.

Brady Ericson: The second, Jake was around?

Jake Scholl: Sorry, the second part of that was just around separation-related charges in the free cash flow guidance.

Chris Gropp: Okay. On separation charges, they’re basically exit. The only thing that BorgWarner is caring for us is mainly IT-related. The majority of the TSAs are done. The only thing remaining are, they’re helping us bridge over for [indiscernible] which will go into Q2. So really anything that they’re carrying for us, we’re going to replace with our own IT charges. So there’s no really other — it’s just going to be replacement.

Brady Ericson: Yes, it’s basically — it’s in our numbers. I think a lot of the — we actually had quite a few transitions happen in the last week or so, where we’re creating clones. And so again, that’s included in our $20 million of corporate costs and in our current guide. And generally, as with the new contracts that we’ve signed up, as we transition away from maybe their clouds and servers to our servers, we kind of know where those costs are going to be, which is why we’re confident in our overall costs and guide.

Chris Gropp: Said another way, it’s just replacement costs. Whatever we’re paying them for IT and other services, we replace generally at the same rate of cost.

Jake Scholl: Perfect. Thank you. And then previously when you guys talked about your 2030 targets, you said that for GDI revenue to stay flat from 2026 to 2030, you need about three points of market share gain. And we’ve seen pretty strong conquest wins this year. So can you just provide an update on how you guys are thinking about share gain over both the next few years and the second half of the decade? Thank you.

Brady Ericson: Yes. I think, in general, we are continuing to win. There’s still a lot more quoting that’s going to be happening in the next years as I think hybrids and plug-in hybrid volumes continue to remain strong, getting into specific market share gains. We’re still very confident in being able to hit our 2030 numbers. And as we kind of get closer to launching those programs, we’ll kind of convey whether that growth rate can increase. But at this point, we’re still very confident in our 2030 targets. As I just mentioned, as you know, most of the programs that are awarded now will launch in, say, roughly two years, some a little bit faster, some a little bit later and they’re long-length programs. And so, we’re feeling very confident in our positioning on the GDI side.

Jake Scholl: Perfect. Thank you.

Brady Ericson: Thank you.

Operator: Your next question comes from John Murphy with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

John Murphy: Hi. Good morning, everybody. I just wanted to follow up on that line of questioning on the GDI side and your exposure to hybrids, Brady, as you look at this, obviously there’s a shift back or maybe a shift back towards hybrids and plug-in hybrids. And the share gains there might be pretty material as far as a segment or a powertrain over the next few years as EVs are sputtering and there’s a push obviously towards lower emissions and higher fuel economy. So as you look at your forecasts, what have you generally encompassed in your hybrid penetration, sort of in your outlook in your 2030 targets? And are you seeing some early signs of potential upside here?

Brady Ericson: Yeah. I mean, obviously, if hybrids stick around longer, that’s obviously a good thing for us. GDI penetration rates on hybrids is generally higher than on non-hybrids. And obviously, the content per vehicle on GDI is significantly higher than a PFI application. I think a lot of the wins that we have now, I think, are positive and are going to put us in a very good position if hybrids kind of stay where they are and we see continued penetration in hybrids. We’re going to continue to view, keep an eye on where penetration rates are. I think people were really surprised this year on the strength of hybrids. So it’s always going to be difficult to predict on what we think hybrid penetration rates are going to be in 2028, 2029.

But I think in general, I think people are realizing that a hybrid solution is a really good solution for many consumers and many markets in the world right now, which is why I think consumers are buying them because they get a lot of benefit and I think a lot of — significant amount of CO2 reduction for the environment. And so, I do think as people update those forecasts and hybrids have a higher penetration rate, I think we’ll benefit from that.

John Murphy: Okay. And then just a second question. Yes, we’re talking about $80 million of costs and rationalization savings targets. Seems like you’re making good progress on that. How much of that is included in the 2024 outlook? Is that what’s included in the 2024 outlook? And is there any potential upside? Because it does seem like you’re executing a little bit ahead of plan.

Brady Ericson: Yes, I mean, we’re right online again at the overall corporate cost. And the corporate cost also includes all of our stock compensation for all employees as well. And so, right now, we’ve been running 19, I think, the last couple of quarters, and I think we’re right in line with that. And so, I think obviously we’ll continue to drive other operational improvements in other areas, as well as some of our supply chain that caused some headwinds this year. And so, we think we’re in a good position right now and the team is really coming together.

Chris Gropp: And just to be clear, it is in our 2024 plans. It’s all baked in.

John Murphy: Got you. That’s helpful. And just the last one on that target of getting the 20% or so on the tax rate from 28% to 32% in your 2024 outlook. What’s the time frame on grinding down to that? And would that mean that your cash taxes are down by a similar amount just to understand the potential for cash flow impact going forward?

Brady Ericson: Yes. One quick question. I think Chris may have misspoke. I think you said 20%, 27%. I think they heard 20%. And so, we’re heading towards — down towards 27% or below. So then I’ll ask.

Chris Gropp: I said 20%.

Michael Heifler: May I probably, it’s my handwriting, probably.

Brady Ericson: No, I — we — Mike and I heard 20% as well. So we’re…

Chris Gropp: Sorry, I misread.

Michael Heifler: Thanks for the question, John.

Chris Gropp: I was wishing. No, it’s — so this year we’ve already put in place a plan to work it, but it’s going to, obviously with these things, take a bit of time. So as I said, we’re going to get to between 28% and 32% this year and we just have to continue chunking away at it going down. But anything, because we have so much business that’s overseas, it takes a good period of time to get all of this stuff in place. So it’s going to take a couple of years.

John Murphy: But that will be mostly cash, that delta, is that correct?

Chris Gropp: Yes.

John Murphy: Okay. Thank you very much. I appreciate it.

Operator: Your next question comes from Colin Langan with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Colin Langan: Thanks for taking my question. Just to follow up on the hybrid, can you remind me of the content per vehicle opportunity? Is it just that there’s higher take rates on GDI and hybrids, or do you actually have more product opportunity on hybrid as well?

Brady Ericson: Yes, I think two things. One is GDI penetration rates on hybrids are a little bit higher than on traditional combustion engines, primarily because no one’s working on a next-generation traditional combustion. And so, all the newer engines tend to be hybrid, and GDI is a key technology they’re using. From a content, whether it’s a GDI standardized or a GDI hybrid, it’s going to be similar. With that said, one of the things that we’re winning now is our ECUs or engine control units. And so, they’re sourcing more systems and that typically — that’s a new, I guess, kind of product line for us. We were purchasing those from our former parent and reselling those. But some of the next-generation product, there are designs and we’ll be sourcing those and supplying those directly to our customers. So there is some content increase that we see on the overall GDI system.

Colin Langan: Got it. And there’s been a lot of sort of pushouts on electric vehicles. Are your conversations on sort of the next-generation engines and hybrids changing at all? Are you seeing customers looking to develop new programs, or are they just extending the life of programs that are already in place for the most part?

Brady Ericson: I mean, for us, we didn’t see a slowdown in quote activity in the last few years, and so the quote activity is still high. And so, I think a lot of it is going to be around, hey, they want more volume or much higher volume than they were originally expecting, or they’re being extended.

Chris Gropp: But we did see some customers come in that we had not really spoken to on GDI before come in and ask for GDI applications, and then CV is a little different. I mean, they’re really looking to extend and make sure that we’re going to be there.

Brady Ericson: Right. But I think on the hybrid side, we’ve had a number of customers and hybrid applications that we’re on that are now asking for 2 times as many as we originally contracted. And so, I think it’s not necessarily new programs. I think it’s volume increases and/or extensions.

Colin Langan: Interesting. Okay. And just lastly, what are your assumptions? A lot of suppliers have been calling out high labor inflation, other cost inflation, and expectation that they could get recoveries this year. Are you seeing continued headwinds into this year, and do you expect to get full recovery from your customers?

Chris Gropp: Our blended labor rate increase for this next year because it’s different around the world is between 4% and 5%. For the most part, it’s leveling back out. But there are a few areas in the world where it is much higher. For instance, in Mexico and in those cases, we do expect to get reimbursement because that’s the — we got it last year. We will go for reimbursement any place that it’s sort of out of the — what do we call the original norms.

Brady Ericson: But we do see overall inflationary costs, I guess, muting a little bit. So I think it’s not as high it was in the last couple of years, but there are still going to be some pockets or specific labor inflation items that we’ll be looking into.

Colin Langan: Okay. All right. Thanks for the question.

Operator: Your next question comes from Winnie Dong with Deutsche bank. Please go ahead.

Winnie Dong: Hi, can you guys hear me?

Brady Ericson: Yes, we can.

Winnie Dong: Hello. Thank you. I was wondering if you can comment on maybe the dynamics of your various end markets. It seems like it’s either mostly flat or down, but — and your revenue is sort of flattish for 2024 outlook. I was wondering if you can just maybe go into a bit more details on the maintenance of revenue performance, a bit more details on the penetration and share gains that you talked about earlier.

Brady Ericson: Yeah, I think in general, I think, the CV markets are going to be relatively globally depressed, especially in North America and Europe. Last year was a pretty robust market. I think people are expecting this year to kind of be down, but at the same token, they’re preparing for 2025 and 2026 rebound with new emissions, regulations, and potential pre-buys. And so, we’re still working with customers on making sure we’re installing additional capacity now to be prepared for that pre-buy. So it’s just part of the cyclicality that we see on the CV sector, but we continue to see strong demand for our products and market share gains, which is why our OE business is still relatively flat. As we mentioned, on the light vehicle side, the market is down about 5% for engines production because EVs are despite a lot of the press out there, EV penetration is still increasing.

And so, with a flat to down light vehicle market and increasing EV penetration, although slower than people were expecting, we still see engine production being down about 5%. But with our — again, with our market share gains in our GDI business, we’re able to offset some of those headwinds in our OE business. Hopefully, that’ll slow down a little bit and the global market for light vehicle will go back up and we’ll continue to gain market share and put us in a pretty good position. I think our aftermarket, just the one benefit that we have with close to a third of our revenues in the aftermarket, it continues to be a strong growth area. Regardless of the overall market as people delay purchases, they’re still buying service parts and they’re keeping their vehicles on the road.

And that’s a good balance, I think, for overall business is — a third of the business is going to continue just to chunk away and we continue to gain momentum in our aftermarket customers as well, growing low to mid-single digits.

Winnie Dong: Thank you. That’s very helpful. And then maybe a longer-term question. Just like the earlier questions on EV sort of adoption slowing down and also the administration potentially relaxing limits on some tailpipe emissions and potentially adoption of the EV getting slower in out years and requirements getting lower in the out years. I’m just curious as it relates to your $5 billion target for end-of-decade revenue, like at what point do you think there’s potentially upside to that target and opportunities you might have there from a regulatory perspective?

Brady Ericson: I mean, obviously, we’re going to continue to try to drive that higher provided we can have programs that we think are going to bring significant value. So that’s always going to be our number one focus. In that $5 billion, it’s roughly our assumption is a 2% to 4% average organic growth, as well as some bolt-on acquisitions that’s going to help us continue to increase our CV as a percent of revenue and aftermarket in our portfolio. And those are with relatively modest assumptions and modest acquisitions using our existing free cash flow. Are there going to be opportunities for us that could drive that higher? I think there will be. Obviously, our assumptions are still with significant EV penetration rates. And the question is going to be what — where is it?

Where does it start to plateau? There’s obviously differing opinions out there. Some are saying, hey, they think that it’s — EVs are going to continue to grow, but globally they’re going to plateau around 30%. Is it 35% or 40%? We’ll kind of see. And obviously, the lower, the better it is for us. And again, we are in a market that competition is declining, not increasing. So there’s definitely opportunities for us to continue to gain share. As I mentioned earlier, there’s also content opportunities for us as we continue to provide more complete systems, including ECUs and calibration services for those customers.

Winnie Dong: Very helpful. Thank you so much.

Operator: Your next question comes from Dan Levy with Barclays. Please go ahead.

Trevor Young: Hi, Trevor Young on for Dan Levy today. Thanks for taking the questions. So first, I just wanted to go — you know, you touched a little bit on the ECUs in your remarks here in the Q&A, but I was just curious, you called out the first internally designed and developed ECU being launched this year and you highlighted electronic systems as a growth area. And I was just curious if you could give a little bit more color on what all you’re doing within that area. The team, did you bring in new hires to do this yourself versus buying from your former parent things like that? And then also just metrics of progress?

Brady Ericson: Yeah, I mean, we actually started bringing over engineers from our former parent probably about close to two years ago. And so, we started doing that as a lot of their engineers were focused on their next-generation inverters and high voltage. And so, we already had all the software engineers and all the calibration engineers were already within our four walls and so that’s how they were split. The hardware side was on our former parent side and we had all the software and calibration engineers. And so, we started bringing over the hardware folks as they didn’t have time to support our ECU needs. And so, it started about two years ago. And as I mentioned, we’re actually going to be launching our first PHINIA-designed ECU as part of our system later on this year.

It’s actually in a hydrogen application and we won our first PHINIA-designed and PHINIA-sourced application that we’ll be launching in the next few years as well. And so, we’re starting that progress already. In some cases, we will use our former parent as a supplier, but it’ll be based on our designs and our programs and our calibration and software. And so, we’ll continue to grow that business. What we also see with some of these recent awards is as customers have moved more and more of their resources into electrification, they have less resources on their combustion and hybrid applications. So that means they want to then source the entire fuel system, including the ECU and calibration services to one supplier and we’re ready to provide that service for them.

Trevor Young: Yes. [Multiple Speakers]

Brady Ericson: Sorry. On the metrics and progress, I think I gave a number of examples that we started from PHINIA design this year to being awarded PHINIA designed and developed and sourced. And we’ll continue to see that grow with our customers through the decade as. I think if you go back to our old Investor Day deck back in June, you’ll see on there where we add like a $5 billion adjustable market opportunity was opening up to us and that’s what we see us going after and we think there’s an opportunity for us to continue to grow our share of ECUs, hopefully, closer to in line with our mid-teens GDI and CV diesel fuel injection penetration rates.

Trevor Young: That’s very helpful color. Thank you. And then I guess just on GDI, the share portion of it’s been talked about quite a bit. I guess, I was just curious, with more interest coming into hybrids of late, have you seen an uptick in competition? I know in the initial deck in your Investor Day, you kind of laid out people — suppliers exiting that space a bit and you gaining from that. Have you seen any indications of more suppliers either wanting to stay in the space longer or even maybe entering it?

Brady Ericson: I have not, no. Again, these are not easy parts. Some of the pressures and the calibration, and we’re continuing to develop next-generation technology. And one great example is the 500 bar. It’s taken a number of years to develop that technology and bring it to production. And a number of our competitors stop developing that next-generation product. It would be very difficult for them to then refire up their R&D resources to develop that product. And then if I’m an OEM, I would be very skeptical of how long are they going to stay committed to that market? Because these are suppliers that have already told their OEMs to please resource it to somebody else. And if I’m a customer and that supplier comes back to me, how long are they going to stay in the business before they exit again?

And so, that’s why I think, I say in a lot of my statements, customers want a reliable supplier for decades to come in this space. And that’s one of the things that we provide them, which is why we’ve been successful. I think our — some of our competitors that have announced their exit and have stopped quoting, it’s going to be very difficult for them to come back in with a competitive product and to be able to gain confidence from the OEMs again.

Trevor Young: That’s great. Thank you.

Operator: Your next question comes from Joe Spak with UBS. Please go ahead.

Joseph Spak: Thanks so much. I actually just wanted to pick up right there on sort of the competition, because I think you’ve clearly stated, right, OEMs are not willing to commit resources. Other sort of suppliers have not — have basically backed away, which is leading to your market share gains. But from your perspective, I guess, I’m wondering about your capacity to sort of support maybe GDI stronger for longer, because it does seem like maybe industry capacity has sort of come down or is coming down. And I’m wondering if you could sort of help us understand your utilization or need to sort of invest further for that product?

Brady Ericson: Yeah, I mean kind of — I guess I’ll give you the bad that turned into a good in the kind of the prior DELPHI days. I think they kind of overcapacitized in GDI. And so we actually have some excess capacity on GDI we had. And we’ve actually taken some of that out of some plants and moved it into regions where we see stronger demand, primarily in North America and in Asia, where we’ve seen a significant uptick in our wins and the new business. And so I think we’re able to use that excess GDI capacity both to support hybrids, but we’ve also been using some of that same capacity and converting it over to commercial applications, as well as for hydrogen, as well as one of the technologies that I mentioned of kind of a low-pressure diesel direct injection system.

And so, we’re actually launching in that 300 to 500 bar range, a direct diesel injection for off-highway applications. That’s helping them meet their more stringent emissions. And so I think in general, we’ve got, even with some of this uptick in demand, I think we’ve got necessary capacity to support it, and we have probably still enough capacity that we’re also reallocating it to hydrogen and off-highway applications.

Chris Gropp: We do have to add some small incremental bits onto this capacity that some of the customers are asking for, which is normal. But again, we’ve gone to a view that if they want a program and whatever they’re giving us, if it’s a four-year program, we’ll buy the assets, but it has to return and depreciate over that period of time. So we’re still being very careful because obviously a short-term trend does not make a long-term trend. So we’re stating carefully, but.

Brady Ericson: Yes, without — at least our new business wins and market share gains, we don’t see a significant, I guess, capital outlay to support these programs. I think the bulk of our capital is still on the CV and off-highway applications.

Chris Gropp: Correct.

Joseph Spak: Yes, I know this is more difficult to sort of calculate, I guess. But based on your comments on competition, would you say industry capacity has come down industry-wide?

Brady Ericson: I think it’s starting to come down. I mean, again, I think what we peak at, what, $95 million, $96 million light vehicles at one point that were predominantly combustion. And so there’s still some capacity. But I think capacity has been coming out of the market as some have exited and or stopped quoting next-generation programs. And so, yeah, I think capacity has come down in the marketplace, and I think that’s good as well.

Joseph Spak: Okay. And then just back on Slide 17 with the outlook, pretty flat sales year-over-year, pretty flat EBITDA at the midpoint, although I think you said maybe 490 is not the right base you would sort of suggest for comparison. But I guess just sort of wondering within that sort of EBITDA 2023 to 2024 bridge, are there any sort of larger puts and takes we should be considering?

Brady Ericson: No, I think, again, we think the — a base comparison is the 474 once we have a full run rate, because you can see in our corporate costs in the first half of the year was more allocation. They were pretty light. And so, if we normalize that to the $80 number, we’re seeing about $16 million improvement in EBITDA and to a midpoint of only $25 million more in revenue. So obviously, that’s really strong conversion, and that’s driven by one conversion on that additional revenue, as well as improving operational performance and dealing with some supplier challenges. And that’s probably driving $10 million of the improvement and then another $5 million to $6 million on the conversion on incremental revenue.

Joseph Spak: Okay, thank you very much.

Operator: There are no further questions at this time.

Brady Ericson: Great. Thanks, everybody, for joining our call. We’re really proud of what the team has delivered this year in 2023 and really looking forward to another good year in 2024 and beyond. So thank you very much for your interest and investment. Have a good day.

Operator: This concludes today’s conference. You may now disconnect.