PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE:PFSI) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE:PFSI) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript July 23, 2025

Operator: Good afternoon, and welcome to PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.’s Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. Additional earnings materials, including presentation slides that will be referred to in this call are available on PennyMac Financial’s website at pfsi.pennymac.com. Before we begin, let me remind you that this call may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks identified on Slide 2 of the earnings presentation that could cause the company’s actual results to differ materially as well as non-GAAP measures that have been reconciled to their GAAP equivalent in the earnings materials. Now I’d like to introduce David Spector, PennyMac Financial’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Dan Perotti, PennyMac Financial’s Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.

David Spector: Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, and thank you to everyone for participating in our second quarter earnings call. For the second quarter, as shown on Slide 3, PFSI reported net income of $136 million or diluted earnings per share of $2.54, this reflects an annualized return on equity of 14%. Excluding the impact of fair value changes and a nonrecurring tax benefit, which Dan will talk about later, PFSI produced an annualized operating ROE of 13%. These results highlight the resilience of our balanced business model and our continued ability to produce solid financial results even during periods of extreme volatility, such as earlier in the second quarter. As you can see on Slide 5, our consistent performance over recent periods of elevated mortgage rates demonstrates the strength of our organically built comprehensive mortgage banking platform.

The stability provided by our balanced business model especially in this higher for longer rate environment is a real strategic advantage. We expect that if interest rates stay in the range of 6.5% to 7.5%, our operating returns on equity will continue to range in the mid- to high teens throughout the remainder of this year. You can further see the strategic advantage of our comprehensive mortgage banking platform on Slide 6 as our business model functions as a very powerful flywheel. Because we are the second largest producer of mortgage loans and the sixth largest servicer, we operate with a significant scale advantage in both businesses. Large volumes of loan production consistently exceed our portfolio runoff, resulting in the continued growth of our loan servicing portfolio.

At the end of the second quarter, our portfolio totaled $700 billion of unpaid principal balance, representing 2.7 million households. This large and growing customer base drives efficient, cost-effective leads to our consumer direct group as we leverage our proprietary servicing platform to effectively service our customers’ needs. Whether it’s a refinance when interest rates decline, or if they’re in the market for a new home purchase or closed-end second mortgage to access their home equity while retaining their low-rate first lien mortgage. And because we have instilled in our team a culture of continued process improvement and technology innovation, we believe we can continue to drive further scale and operational efficiencies into our platform.

Our strategy also allows us to excel on capturing growth in the expanded — in the expanding purchase market. The chart on the bottom of Slide 7 illustrates the projected growth in overall volumes, which is primarily driven by the more consistent purchase market compared to the refinance market. This trend underscores why our strategic emphasis on our relationship businesses with strong ties in their local markets is so vital. Our strong access to this growing market is achieved through our robust presence in correspondent lending and our rapidly increasing market share in broker direct. Our market leadership is supported by our unmatched excellence and support for our business partnership illustrated on Slide 8. This foundation provides a significant strategic alignment with our business partners that is difficult to replicate and has been organically and carefully built over time.

We offer cutting-edge technology, a continued presence in markets with reliable execution and rapid closing and turn times. Additionally, we have long-standing relationships with key partners, and one of the lowest cost structures in the industry, driven by our highly efficient fulfillment operation. Turning to Slide 9, we proudly showcase our position as the outright leader in correspondent lending. Over the last 12 months, we have generated approximately $100 billion in UPB of correspondent production, achieving an estimated market share of approximately 20% in the first half of 2025. This significant volume is a direct result of our more than 15 years of operational excellence, technology innovation and our deep partnerships with many of our nearly 800 active sellers across the country.

A key aspect of our leadership in this channel is our exceptional operational leverage and scale. In fact, we have the ability to increase production by approximately 50% from our current levels with no increase to our fixed expenses. This capability underscores our fundamental strength as a highly efficient, low-cost provider in this channel, solidifying our truly dominant position and creating a substantial competitive advantage. Similarly, you can see on Slide 10 that we are increasingly becoming more relevant in the broker direct channel. From our entry to this business in 2018, our broker direct market share has expanded significantly, currently standing at approximately 5%. We have clearly established ourselves as a trusted partner for brokers.

And though we are already the third largest in the channel, we see tremendous momentum to continue our growth to more than 10% market share by the end of 2026. This remarkable growth and our position as a trusted alternative are driven by our tech-forward platform with unmatched support throughout the origination process. This advanced infrastructure and dedicated assistance assures brokers that their customers will experience a seamless and efficient origination process, empowering brokers and reinforcing their trust in us as a reliable long-term partner. On Slide 11, we highlight the significant opportunity for direct — for consumer direct business and why we are intensely focused on building on our successes in this channel. We have a large network of more than 5 million current and former homeowners who know and trust PennyMac, and we are leveraging our industry-leading team and data analytics to identify refinance and other opportunities so we are best positioned to help meet our customers’ home finance needs.

Our refinance recapture rates already twice the industry average, which effectively protects from the lower impact — from the impacts of lower MSR values as rates decline. And we will continue to leverage our strategic partnership with team USA and the LA ’28 Olympic and Paralympic Games along with targeted model-driven campaigns to increase our visibility and recognition while driving growth in recapture and new customer acquisition. Turning to Slide 12. You can see the significant recapture opportunity for our Consumer Direct division when interest rates do decline. As of June 30, $267 billion in UPB or 38% of the loans in our servicing portfolio have a note rate above 5%. And $181 billion in UPB or 26% of the loans in our portfolio have a note rate above 6%.

This large and growing portfolio of borrowers who recently entered into mortgages at higher rates and stand to benefit from a refinance in the future when interest rates do decline, positions our Consumer Direct Lending division for strong future growth. Our multiyear investments in technology and process innovation have already driven meaningful improvements in recapture rates, and we expect these to continue improving. Now let’s turn to an area that’s not just critical but truly transformative for our entire balanced business model, our unwavering, intense focus on artificial intelligence. On Slide 13, you’ll see we’re not just building momentum, we are accelerating with breakthrough speed in the development of AI. We are aggressively advancing our AI capabilities making targeted and strategic investments.

This strategic commitment is a natural evolution of our history of investing in leading-edge technology, and it is designed to enhance the customer experience, unlock new revenue streams and crucially drive unprecedented levels of efficiency to dramatically reduce expenses. Our dedicated AI Accelerator team is at the forefront, relentlessly focused on delivering and adopting AI applications and productivity tools faster than ever before. Our cloud-based and flexible proprietary platforms have positioned us extraordinarily well to integrate AI, profoundly enhancing our capabilities and efficiency across our entire technology landscape. In production, we’re seeing game-changing advancements. Our proprietary chatbots aren’t just tools, they’re extensions of our loan officers and underwriters, providing instant compliant answers sourced directly from our deep well of comprehensive policies and procedures.

This empowers our team members with unparalleled accuracy and allows them to focus squarely on what they do best, driving sales and closing more loans. And with our AI call summarization, we’re automating critical after-call work, bringing up valuable time and insights for our sales teams contributing directly to increased conversion. In servicing, our AI initiatives are equally impactful, enhancing both efficiency and the client experience. Behind the scenes, our servicing AI processing solution is automating critical document workflows and streamlining operations. And for our clients, our advanced servicing automated assistant available instantly on web and mobile provides immediate access to loan-specific information and answers to their questions.

This empowers our clients with self-service convenience and speed, elevating their overall experience and allowing our team members to focus on more complex, high-value interactions. To date, we’ve already launched or actively developing more than 35 AI tools and applications with a projected annual economic benefit of approximately $25 million. While this is far more than a strong start, this is just the beginning of what’s possible, and we are incredibly excited about what the future holds. This brings me to Slide 14, which illustrates PennyMac’s ambitious groundbreaking vision for artificial intelligence. We have already achieved significant milestones from advanced coding productivity tools to sophisticated workplace tools and intelligent chatbots that are reshaping daily operations, but our road map is truly visionary.

It includes sophisticated agent automation of complex loan processing activities, robust and intuitive self-service capabilities that empowers our customers and advanced lead generation processes that will redefine our outreach. Our ultimate vision is a fully automated loan process, including a seamless self-service origination and servicing experience. This is not just technology. This is the future of mortgage banking and PennyMac is leading the way. In conclusion, our balanced and diversified business model continues to deliver strong financial performance. We maintain our leadership position in the purchase market through our strong correspondent franchise and growing broker direct lending presence, which provides consistent business volumes.

These volumes directly grow our servicing portfolio, creating a significant future opportunity in our consumer direct channel, further enhanced by our strategic brand investments. And throughout all of our operations, our intense focus on AI and technology is effectively driving down costs, contributing to our overall financial strength. Our strategic foundation solidly positions PennyMac for continued growth and strong performance in any market environment, and I’m incredibly excited about what our future holds. I will now turn it over to Dan, who will review the drivers of PFSI’s second quarter financial performance.

Daniel Perotti: Thank you, David. PFSI reported net income of $136 million in the second quarter or $2.54 in earnings per share for an annualized ROE of 14%. These results included $93 million of fair value declines on MSRs, net of hedges and costs and a nonrecurring net tax benefit of $82 million. The contribution from these items to diluted earnings per share was $0.19. PFSI’s Board of Directors declared a second quarter common share dividend of $0.30 per share. Beginning with our Production segment, pretax income was $58 million, down from $62 million in the prior quarter. Total acquisition and origination volumes were $38 billion in unpaid principal balance, up 31% from the prior quarter. Of this, $35 billion was for PFSI’s own account and $3 billion was fee-based fulfillment activity for PMT.

Total lock volumes were $43 billion in UPB, up 26% from the prior quarter. PennyMac maintained its dominant position in correspondent lending in the second quarter with total acquisitions of $30 billion, up 30% from the prior quarter. Correspondent channel margins in the second quarter were 25 basis points, down slightly from the first quarter. While fallout adjusted locks for PFSI’s own account were up from the prior quarter, PFSI account revenues were impacted by a negative contribution from timing of revenue and loan origination expense recognition, hedging and pricing execution and other items as well as a higher proportion of volume in the correspondent and broker direct lending channels relative to last quarter. PMT retained 17% of total conventional conforming correspondent production, down from 21% in the prior quarter.

Of note, pursuant to our renewed mortgage banking agreement with PMT, effective July 1, 2025, all correspondent loans are initially acquired by PFSI. However, PMT will retain the right to purchase up to 100% of nongovernment correspondent loan production. In the third quarter, we expect PMT to acquire approximately 15% to 25% of total conventional conforming correspondent production, consistent with levels in recent quarters. In Broker Direct, we continue to see strong trends and continued growth in market share as we position PennyMac as a strong alternative to channel leaders. Originations in the channel were up almost 60% and locks were up more than 30% from the prior quarter, driven by a growing number of approved brokers who are increasingly recognizing and leveraging our distinct value proposition.

The number of brokers approved to do business with us at quarter end was nearly 5,100, up 19% from the same time last year. And we expect this number to continue growing as top brokers increasingly look for strength and diversification in their business partners. Broker channel margins were down slightly from the prior quarter. Trends were mixed in consumer direct with origination volumes up 6% and locked volumes down 2% from the prior quarter. Margins in the channel were up due to a larger mix of higher-margin closed-end second liens during the quarter. Activity across our channels in July has been mixed with increased activity across correspondent and broker direct and volumes in consumer direct similar to levels reported in the second quarter.

Production expenses, net of loan origination expense increased 8% from the prior quarter, partially due to increased capacity in direct lending, which is expected to drive our ability to rapidly address opportunities presented by lower mortgage rates. Turning to servicing. As David mentioned, our servicing portfolio continues to grow, ending the quarter at $700 billion in unpaid principal balance. The Servicing segment recorded pretax income of $54 million. Excluding valuation-related changes. Pretax income was $144 million or 8.3 basis points of average servicing portfolio of UPB. Loan servicing fees were up from the prior quarter, primarily due to growth in PFSI’s MSR portfolio. Custodial funds managed for PFSI’s owned portfolio averaged $7.5 billion in the second quarter, up from $6.2 billion in the first quarter due to seasonal impacts and higher prepayments.

As a result, earnings on custodial balances and deposits and other income increased. Realization of MSR cash flows increased from the prior quarter due to continued growth of the MSR asset and higher realized and projected prepayment activity. Operating expenses were $80 million for the quarter or 4.6 basis points of average servicing portfolio UPB, down from the prior quarter. You can see on Slide 21 in our Servicing segment, our per loan servicing expenses are among the lowest in the industry, reflecting unit costs that have been on a consistent decline since 2019. Our operating expenses measured as basis points of average servicing portfolio UPB, have come down from almost 8 basis points in 2020 to less than 5 basis points in the last 12 months.

This is a direct result of our proprietary technology, continuous process improvement and platform scale. We seek to moderate the impact of interest rate changes on the fair value of our MSR asset through a comprehensive hedging strategy that also considers production-related income. During the second quarter, the fair value of PFSI’s MSR increased by $16 million, $26 million was due to changes in market interest rates, which was partially offset by $10 million of other assumption changes and performance-related impacts. Excluding costs, hedge fair value declines were $55 million. Hedge costs were $54 million, the majority of which were incurred in April due to extreme interest rate volatility. As we moved into the third quarter, we strategically adjusted our hedging practices to align with our increased direct lending capacity, and we currently expect lower hedge costs and greater consistency of hedge performance with respect to the direction of rate movements in future periods.

Corporate and other items contributed a pretax loss of $35 million compared to $34 million in the prior quarter. PFSI recorded a tax benefit of $60 million in the quarter, driven by a nonrecurring tax benefit of $82 million, which primarily consisted of a repricing of deferred tax liabilities due to state apportionment changes driven by recent legislation. PFSI’s tax provision rate in future periods is expected to be 25.2%, down from 26.7% in recent quarters. We were also active in the management of our financing in the second quarter. In May, we successfully issued $850 million of unsecured senior notes due in 2032 and utilized a portion of the proceeds to redeem our initial unsecured debt offering of $650 million that was due later this year in October.

Additionally, we redeemed $500 million of Ginnie Mae MSR term notes due in May of 2027 and replaced that debt with MSR financing from one of our lenders at a more attractive spread to optimize our costs. We ended the quarter with $4 billion of total liquidity, which includes cash and amounts available to draw in facilities where we have collateral pledged. We’ll now open it up for questions. Operator?

Q&A Session

Operator: I would like to remind everyone we will only take questions related to PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. or PFSI. [Operator Instructions] We’ll take our first question today from Crispin Love, Piper Sandler.

Crispin Love: First, just on the operating ROEs. They were 13% in the quarter, some of the lowest levels for several quarters. So curious if you can first discuss some of the puts and takes in the quarter, including margin trends and then your confidence of getting back to that mid- to high teens level in the back half of the year as stated in your guidance? .

Daniel Perotti: Sure, Crispin. This is Dan. Thanks for the question. With respect to the operating ROE dipping a bit to 13% really, I would say, driven by two factors in the quarter. One was related to on the production side, related to the margins in the channel. So those came down a bit quarter-over-quarter. Some of that was driven, if you look versus the prior quarters by a negative impact in some of the cross-channel activities which was down about $10 million this quarter, a negative contribution of about $10 million this quarter versus $17 million in the prior quarter, and this is on Page 18 of the deck. We typically — we see that those cross channel impacts fluctuate. We had bit of a negative impact due to some of the interest rate and spread volatility in the second quarter.

We did see some of that reverse itself as we go into the third quarter and overall margins toward the end of the second quarter and beginning of the third quarter have been trending higher, especially in the correspondent channel. And so as we look out with respect to production, moving forward for the next few quarters, we expect improvement from the — on a margin basis and in terms of the overall income from that channel. Looking at the servicing — on the servicing side, did see a reduction in the pretax income, excluding valuation-related changes for the quarter. That was primarily driven by an increase in the realization of MSR cash flows quarter-over-quarter, which was driven by an uptick in overall prepayment speeds as well as an increase in the overall size of the MSR asset as well as a bit of an uptick in some of the nonoperating expense items.

So payoff related expenses and interest expense. Some of those, especially related to some of the prepayment activity. We don’t necessarily expect to see at the same level that we saw this quarter. Additionally, interest expense includes certain onetime items related to the retirement of some of our debt. And so we expect that to maintain on a bit more of a level basis as we continue to increase our servicing portfolio. So all of that being said is that our expectation as we’re moving into the next couple of quarters in terms of our operating ROE is that we expect it to improve from the levels that we saw here in Q2.

David Spector: And I think, look, I share the disappointment in kind of that lower number. But I will tell you what I’ve seen, it really — that’s improving in the latter part of the quarter and July has been a continuation of the improvement. I think that we’re seeing margins, margins have clearly bottomed out in correspondent. We’re seeing a slight increase there as well as what we’re seeing in broker direct is something similar. And so I think that we’re looking forward to continuing to participate in getting those margins up in both of those channels as well.

Crispin Love: Great, Dan and David for that color. Just a follow-up for me on hedging going forward. Dan, you commented some changes you made that you expect greater consistency. Can you dig a little bit more into that? What are you changing? Are you still targeting 80% to 90% hedge ratio? And then has the recent rate stability helped as well just on the hedging side?

Daniel Perotti: Sure. So overall, as I commented, we’ve adjusted some of our approach to hedging to have a greater recognition of the potential for recapture coming from our overall production channels and specifically our consumer direct channel or our direct channels. And we’ve adjusted our staffing in our direct channels to ensure that if we do see rate volatility or dips in rates that we can very quickly and actively pursue those recapture and origination opportunities that will serve as an offset to reductions in the value of the MSR portfolio and that allowed us to adjust some of the ways that we approach our hedging of the MSR portfolio to be a bit more stable and less active in terms of adjusting our hedges with changes in rates.

And so in doing that, we expect that we will have lower costs as we go forward, you can see that we did have a fairly significant costs in the quarter related to some of the interest rate volatility that we experienced in April. But we expect lower costs as we’re moving forward as well as given the positioning that we have to have greater consistency in terms of when interest rates increase, seeing a net increase in the value of the MSR versus the hedges and the opposite when interest rates decline. Overall, we are still targeting an 80% to 90% hedge ratio, at least in sort of rates within a near band to current rate levels. And so we haven’t changed our posture from that perspective. But given the — our changes in the way we’ve implemented the hedging profile as we go forward, we do expect more stability in terms of the hedge position, which drives lower cost as well as greater sort of directional performance.

Operator: Next is Bose George, KBW.

Bose George: Just wanted to follow up on the profitability question. Just in terms of the servicing portfolio, what’s a good run rate for the profitability there, just — looking at it just in basis points. I mean it makes sense, the amortization increased with a bigger MSR, but conceptually, you might have thought that would be offset by a higher servicing fees. So yes, just kind of a good way to think about what that number should be.

Daniel Perotti: Yes, if you look back over the past few quarters, this was a bit in terms of the pretax income, excluding market — excluding valuation changes, was a bit of a dip from what we’ve seen historically. As I said, there were some onetime items or items that were specific to this quarter that impacted that. Generally, at these — at the rate levels that we’re at currently, which are a bit higher and assuming not great — very significant levels of rate volatility, we’d expect the basis points on the servicing portfolio to move toward what we’ve seen over the past few quarters in the 9 to 10 basis point range. In any given quarter, there can be certain items that impacts the overall result, but that would be our expectation generally going forward at these rate levels.

Bose George: Okay. Great. And the decline there or the increase, I guess, in that basis points would be largely on lower amortization.

Daniel Perotti: Lower — slightly lower proportional amortization. As I mentioned, some of the other impacts that we saw during the quarter payoff-related expenses. There was a slight uptick versus what our run rate has been in terms of the losses and provisions for defaulted loans and the interest expense contribution. So really some normalization across those different facets.

Bose George: Okay. Great. And then in terms of the cross-channel volatility number on Slide 17, I mean, is that mainly — like was that mainly hedging related on this quarter? Or are there other things kind of driving that as well?

Daniel Perotti: It was primarily related in the quarter to really volatility of spreads, at least at certain points in the quarter. So there was a fair amount of spread volatility during the quarter. We have increasing amounts of our portfolio or of our production that is not necessarily directly deliverable into agency execution. That’s driving higher margins in a number of our channels. But to the extent that we see spread volatility in those channels can — especially at certain points in the quarter can have an impact in that other line item.

Bose George: Okay. So things like non-agency and second is getting marked through there?

Daniel Perotti: Yes, to the extent that it occurs after we’ve locked the loan.

Operator: The next question will come from Eric Hagen, BTIG.

Eric Hagen: Maybe following up on the profitability, looking at the servicing profitability on Page 20. Is there a way to like sensitize the earnings on both the custodial balances and the interest expense line if the Fed delivers a rate cut like for a 25-basis point cut, how much are each of those lines changing? And are they changing by a proportional amount, if you will?

Daniel Perotti: Yes. So you can look at the outstanding debt that we have that is related to MSRs is almost all to our MSR term notes as well as the repo related to MSRs, which is all — basically all floating rate debt would be tied to SOFR, which is very directly tied to the Fed rate. Similarly, we would expect that the earnings on custodial balances is tied very similarly or would move very similarly to how the Fed rate moves, and we’ve provided the balances of custodial funds here. So you could pass that through in terms of those outstanding balances, and that would be the impact of those two line items.

Eric Hagen: Yes. Okay. That’s good. If mortgage rates are higher from here, I mean how sticky do you expect margins to be in the correspondent channel. I mean do you think we could get a scenario where community banks either use the cash window more frequently or they keep loans in the portfolio by financing them with the FHLB? Like what’s the — what are the conditions that might drive that?

David Spector: Look, I think that we’re seeing actually the opposite in our correspondent channel, in that we’re seeing more of the production going to whole loan buyers like ourselves primarily because #1, the sellers don’t have the margin to be able to retain the servicing. But more importantly, given the high rate of the servicing and the fact they don’t hedge the servicing it makes more sense for them to sell the whole loan. So I think that we’re going to continue to see correspondent aggregators to be very active in this higher for longer environment, where you see retention taking place is typically when margins are wider and rates are at a perceived bottom. And so I think we’re just — I think coming out of COVID, we’ve seen this phenomenon only grow.

The cash windows can get busier from time-to-time but that’s at their discretion. It’s not at the discretion of the seller. And typically, those who do sell through the cash window are more mortgage bankers that perhaps will aggregate servicing and auction it off. But again, given the volatility in the markets, aggregating servicing is not for the faint of heart, and I think if you’re not hedging servicing, it could backfire pretty quickly on you. So I think — look, I think this speaks to how we’re growing share in correspondent and just the level of feedback we’re getting from our customers is pretty impactful and I continue to expect it to stay that way for the foreseeable future. We’re just in a really tough market, in that we’ve been higher for a lot longer.

And that’s something we continue to focus on here are the things we can control and things like growing share, becoming more efficient and continuing to reduce our expenses and deploy technology or things that we’re focused on. And look, that’s kind of inures to the benefit of those who are selling loans because we can just be more active and more dynamic as we’re looking to grow share in correspondent.

Eric Hagen: Great stuff. I appreciate your comments.

Operator: Michael Kaye from Wells Fargo has the next question.

Michael Kaye: I wanted to see if you could dig into the loan origination expense line item that was up a lot quarter-over-quarter. Was that driven by the broker direct volume what’s happening over there?

Daniel Perotti: Yes. That’s exactly correct, Michael. And thanks for the question. So our production — our origination expense line item in terms of our accounting includes the fee paid through to the broker. And so if you look at an individual transaction for our broker direct channel, we have a larger gain on sale that would be excluding the broker fee and then the broker fee, which is a pretty meaningful component showing up in origination expenses. And so we’ll see an outsized increase in those origination expenses as compared to the overall total as broker becomes a greater percentage of our overall production or overall originations. We do look to normalize for that. So in terms of the way that we think about margin, we really think of our gross margins, our revenue margins being net of that broker — that broker fee and so the presentation that we have in the earnings deck that we had been referencing on Page 18 of the earnings deck nets the — Net all of the origination expenses out of each of the individual lines.

So that broker direct margin that’s reflected there of 87 basis points in this quarter is net of that broker fee that is represented in origination expenses. But as we continue to grow our broker direct originations that those broker fees falling through to origination expense will have an outsized impact to the extent that broker is growing at a faster clip than our other channels.

Michael Kaye: My follow-up question. I don’t think I’ve heard during the call any update on the sub-servicing initiatives. I know you had some early agreements, last quarter you mentioned and some negotiations still going on, anything meaningful there?

David Spector: Look, we’re making a lot of good headway on the subservicing, and we don’t have anything substantial to report. I can tell you that we’ve brought in a major leader into the organization to lead that effort. And we’re continuing to work with our correspondents in particular, but we’re looking to starting with this quarter to expand out on the horizon in terms of different pockets of those who own servicing. So I expect to see good activity before the end of the year on that front. Many of our correspondent customers who own servicing have either moved that servicing off their balance sheets or they’re selling whole loans as I talked about a few minutes ago. I think also given the dynamics in the marketplace, I think larger holders of servicing who have their servicing place are waiting to see how things play out in the marketplace.

And I think over the next 6 to 12 months, you’ll see more servicing moving amongst subservicers. And so we’re just positioning ourselves to be one of those subservicers to capitalize on the opportunity.

Operator: Next up is Doug Harter from UBS.

Douglas Harter: Dan, as I look at Slide 23 on leverage, you talked that the nonfunding debt might sort of trend above your target. Can you just talk about how you’re thinking about leverage and whether you view any constraints from your current leverage level?

Daniel Perotti: So yes, we do not have any concerns from our current leverage level at elevated rates at the higher for longer, as David had kind of — had mentioned earlier, we do expect to run — we have heavier emphasis on the servicing side of the business and the MSR asset. I mean that’s driving our nonfunding debt-to-equity levels a bit higher than our long-term target and where we’ve run historically. At these levels, we don’t have any concerns. We do think that we could run potentially a little bit above on the nonfunding debt to equity, as we mentioned here, a little bit above the 1.5x. You can see our overall debt-to-equity is at 3.4x, is consistent with the prior quarter and with our overall debt-to-equity target. And so we don’t have any concerns on the leverage side.

David Spector: I share Dan’s point of view from the rating agency standpoint. And from our business partners standpoint, I can tell you, in our industry, we’re always worried about leverage. And I think it’s something that is always front and center in our minds. I think to the point Dan is raising, we’ve been very focused and judicious in how we think about leverage and how we think about that nonfunding debt number. And I think we’re — it factors into how we think about pricing for servicing and how we price for loans. And I think it’s something that we’re very mindful of. But I think given the environment we’re in, it’s something that has not come as a surprise to us to see it creep back up. But at the same time there, we clearly have it front and center.

Operator: We’ll go next to Ryan Shelley from Bank of America.

Ryan Shelley: Most of mine have been answered. I was just hoping give any color around delinquency rates. It looks like they picked up a bit in the quarter, but still below the year ago period. So just any commentary or any specific end markets to call out there would be probably helpful.

Daniel Perotti: Sure. Thanks for the question. So Page 32 has our trends for delinquency rates. You’re correct that they did creep up during the quarter, although that’s really consistent with what we see on a seasonal basis, typically. I think the item of note is really that they decreased on a year-over-year basis, so down from 5.7% to 5.6%. And so overall, we are seeing relative stability in terms of delinquencies in the portfolio, part of what has allowed us to hold in delinquencies in the portfolio is our judicious underwriting of the loans that we are bringing into the portfolio. And so you can see the performance of — for the more greatly exposed credit areas of the servicing portfolio in terms of more recent vintage government loans, FHA and VA loans, our delinquencies are significantly lower than the overall industry.

And I think that really speaks to our ability to shape the portfolio and ensure that we are less exposed to some of the lower credit portions of the universe — of the mortgage loan universe and ensure that we have greater stability in terms of the delinquencies in our portfolio.

David Spector: But I think that while the delinquencies are up, advances are down, borrowers have a lot of equity built up in their properties. And there’s still — even with the cutback of a few government programs, there’s still good government programs to help keep borrowers in their homes. And the thing that — the number that I’m encouraged by the delinquencies of our recently originated vintages are lower than the overall industry. And that speaks to the point Dan made about our ability to diligence our loans and correspondent and to underwrite in broker and consumer direct. And that speaks to the risk management culture that we have here at the company.

Operator: And we’ll go to Trevor Cranston from Citizens JMP.

Trevor Cranston: Follow-up question on the change in the hedging strategy. If I understood correctly, you said it was mainly increasing the capacity at consumer direct to improve recapture. So looking at Slide 18, there’s a note that says part of the increase in production expenses was related to increased capacity in direct lending. Is that related to the change in hedging strategy? Or should we be thinking about some incremental increase in production expenses in 3Q specifically related to that change in hedging strategy.

Daniel Perotti: No, that’s exactly correct. So the hedging — or the — sorry, the production expenses for Q2 do incorporate most of the additional capacity that we have brought on that has allowed us to feel comfortable repositioning our hedge or approaching our hedge strategy a bit differently. The overall, we’ve been building that capacity through this quarter, most of the expenses are reflected here in the second quarter. There may be an additional $1 million to $3 million of that since we didn’t have the capacity on for the entire quarter, that would be increased on a completely flat basis as we go into the third quarter, but most of it is reflected here in these expenses for the second quarter.

David Spector: Yes. If you look at the hedge performance of the $84 million negative $54 million of it is hedge costs. And so one of the areas that we’ve spent a lot of time on is really getting our arms around what is the recapture opportunity that we have in the portfolio and how do we factor that into? How — one, we value the servicing and how does that affect the hedge and obviously, it should bring down the hedge costs. Now if you have that in your methodology, you want to make sure you’re going to recapture the loans. And to do that, we have to put on the capacity. But the capacity is a fraction of the hedge cost that we’ve been experiencing over the prior quarters. And so I’m encouraged by what I’m seeing really even this quarter in terms of that hedge cost number, driving significantly lower. And so I think it’s something that’s going to lend itself to more consistent ROEs as we look forward.

Operator: And we have no further questions at this time. I’ll now turn it back to David Spector for closing remarks.

David Spector: Well, I want to thank everyone for joining us here today and for giving us their time. And as always, if you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out to our IR team and Isaac and the team. And thank you all very much for the time and thoughtful questions and looking forward to speaking to all of you soon. Take care.

Operator: And thank you all for joining us this afternoon. We encourage investors with additional questions to contact our Investor Relations team by e-mail or phone. Thank you. You may now disconnect.