Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) Does an Xbox One – Eighty

Page 1 of 2

It’s only been a week since E3, and Microsoft’s DRM approach for Xbox One has utterly collapsed under the pressure of angry gamers everywhere. Yesterday Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) announced a policy that essentially mirrors that of its rival in the coming next-gen console wars, Sony Corporation (ADR) (NYSE:SNE).

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT)

DRM backlash

In the announcement, Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) reversed all the essential elements of the DRM system it had intended to impose with Xbox One (XB1).  Gone is the requirement to be always connected to the Internet, or check in with Microsoft once a day.  Any disk-based single player game will be playable offline after installation, although the disc will need to be in the tray.  Also gone are the new limitations on used games.  Sharing, lending, or giving disc-based games will work as it does on Xbox 360.

The speed with which Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) caved on DRM has been truly breathtaking. I really didn’t expect it to come before Sony Corporation (ADR) (NYSE:SNE)‘s PS4 and the XB1 had an opportunity to go toe-to-toe in the market place, and that wasn’t going to happen before the end of the year, since Sony had announced a late December release.

Apparently Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) read some of the polls I mentioned in my last post on the subject, “Sony and Microsoft Battle for Hearts and Minds at E3.” The response to Microsoft’s DRM approach was resoundingly negative, and continuing to pursue it would have set Microsoft up for a flop of epic proportions.

As it is, Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) still has an uphill battle to win over prospective console consumers.  XB1 still has a higher price tag ($499 compared to $399 for the PS4), as well as the burden of the Kinect sensor, which so many gamers loathe.  Well, maybe it is a little creepy having a live, Internet-connected camera staring at you full time when you’re in front of the TV.

Here, Microsoft’s best option might be to allow users to substitute some other control device for the Kinect.  The XB1’s Windows 8 based OS needs some form of gesture recognition for things like swiping between screens, but it’s possible that the game controller could stand in for these functions.  I wouldn’t be surprised if a Kinect-less option for the XB1 appears before the end of the year.

Xbox One DRM and Kinect have been the major complaints about XB1, but by no means the only ones.  Most people find the XB1 bulky and unattractive compared to the PS4.  And then there are the skeptics who believe that both the Sony and Microsoft consoles will be junk compared to PC gaming platforms.

The skeptics are right that the consoles won’t perform as well as a PC with a high end graphics card.  What the skeptics don’t understand is that the consoles don’t need to.  What the consoles need to do is provide sufficient HD TV frame rates for responsive gaming, typically about 30 – 60 Hz.  Based on the demos at E3, this is exactly what the consoles will provide.

The intensity of the consumer response and Microsoft’s reaction demonstrates how high the stakes are for both Sony and Microsoft.  For instance, in 2012 Q4 Microsoft introduced the Surface RT as well as the Windows Phone 8 mobile operating system.  In that quarter 900,000 Surface RT devices were sold (according to IDC) and 6.2 million Windows Phones were sold (according to Gartner).  In Q4 of this year, Microsoft will sell about 5 million XB1 consoles, as a conservative estimate, and possibly more if Microsoft does a good job of addressing remaining consumer concerns about the device, since Sony won’t be in the market until the end of the year.

Page 1 of 2