MetLife, Inc. (NYSE:MET) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

MetLife, Inc. (NYSE:MET) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript May 7, 2026

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the MetLife First Quarter 2026 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. Before we get started, I refer you to the cautionary note about forward-looking statements in yesterday’s earnings release and to risk factors discussed in MetLife’s SEC filings. With that, I will turn the call over to John Hall, Global Head of Investor Relations.

John Hall: Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us for MetLife’s First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. Before we begin, I’d point you to the information on non-GAAP measures on the Investor Relations portion of metlife.com in our earnings release and in our quarterly financial supplements, which you should review. On the call this morning are Michel Khalaf, President and Chief Executive Officer; and John McCallion, Chief Financial Officer and Head of MetLife Investment Management. Also available to participate in the discussion are other members of senior management. Last night, we released an earnings call presentation, which addresses the quarter. It is available on our website. John McCallion will speak to this presentation in his prepared remarks.

An appendix to the deck features disclosures, GAAP reconciliations and other information, which you should also review. After prepared remarks, we will have a Q&A session, which will end promptly at the top of the hour. As a reminder, please limit yourself to 1 question and 1 follow-up. Now, over to Michel.

Michel Khalaf: Thank you, John, and good morning, everyone. This was an excellent quarter and a strong start to the year as we demonstrated the full earnings power of MetLife guided by our New Frontier strategy. Adjusted earnings were ahead of last year for all operating business segments with across-the-board top line growth. Margins were resilient, and we deployed capital with discipline, investing responsibly in growth and returning excess capital to shareholders. Importantly, this quarter’s performance was balanced and repeatable. Each of the key elements that drive our strategy, diversified businesses, disciplined capital allocation and investment portfolio and balance sheet strength all came together to demonstrate the promise and resilience of MetLife’s superior value proposition.

Year 1 of New Frontier was about building the right engine to drive growth and establish MetLife as a high-quality compounder over time. Year 2 is about acceleration and driving execution across our portfolio of market-leading businesses, where we serve more than 100 million customers. The first quarter provides early evidence that we’re moving forward with urgency and discipline and are well positioned to deliver against the ambitious financial commitments we’ve established. Turning to first quarter results. We reported adjusted earnings of $1.6 billion or $2.42 per share. Adjusted earnings increased 18% from the prior year period. Adjusted earnings per share increased 23% year-over-year, faster than earnings growth, reflecting our steady capital management.

Adjusted premiums, fees and other revenues, excluding pension risk transfers, increased 10% year-over-year. Growth was broad-based, spanning nearly all businesses and regions. Variable investment income totaled $518 million pretax, marking the third consecutive quarter of above-expectation VII. The first quarter result was near the top of the range we announced last month and driven by higher private equity returns, roughly 2.9%, aided by strong venture capital performance. Adjusted return on equity was 17%, at the top end of our 15% to 17% target range and far above our cost of capital. Our direct expense ratio was 11.9%, an improvement from last year and favorable relative to our full year target. This result is even more impressive when you consider the integration of PineBridge, a business with a structurally higher expense profile typical of asset managers.

Turning to the performance of our business segments. Starting with Group Benefits, the segment generated adjusted earnings of $439 million, up 19% year-over-year. Life mortality in the quarter was exceptional, as working population mortality continues to trend favorably and was further helped by a light flu season this year. Total sales were up 15% in the quarter and adjusted PFOs, excluding participating contracts rose 4%. Within national accounts, our persistency is in the high 90s, and our average customer tenure is more than 20 years, illustrating the strength of Group Benefits contribution to our recurring revenue model and its consistent compounding of value over time. Looking ahead, our market leadership, scale and enduring customer relationships position us well to drive growth in the most attractive segment of the U.S. life insurance market.

Employers continue to see the value of benefits beyond medical coverage as a cost-effective way to support their employees’ health and financial security journeys in a tight economy. Moving to Retirement & Income Solutions, or RIS. We reported adjusted earnings of $451 million, up 11% from a year ago, lifted by strong variable investment income. After a record-setting fourth quarter for pension risk transfers and longevity reinsurance, newer additions to the lineup, U.K.-funded reinsurance and retail annuity reinsurance contributed $1.5 billion of new sales, further reinforcing the diversity of our product offerings. The breadth of our global retirement opportunity set is substantial and extends around the world to include top markets such as the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan.

These are markets where demographics are driving the demand for income, which our product suite is well suited to provide. Turning now to Asia. The region delivered an outstanding quarter. Adjusted earnings of $487 million increased 31%. Sales performance in the quarter was very strong as the region advanced 22% on a constant currency basis. In Japan, our largest market in Asia, we saw continued strength in both FX and yen-denominated products. We also benefited from a new corporate accident and health product introduced in the quarter. Altogether, Japan sales rose 26% on a constant currency basis. For Korea, our second largest market in Asia, the combination of a solid economy and our product innovation has been a driver of growth with constant currency sales increasing 44%.

In Latin America, adjusted earnings totaled $229 million, an increase of 5% despite the impact of last year’s tax change in Mexico. Performance was supported by robust sales growth and persistency in the quarter with sales increasing 20% and adjusted PFOs up 11%, both on a constant currency basis. The region demonstrated strong underlying momentum in the quarter, led by employee benefits growth in Mexico, retirement annuity demand in Chile and the ongoing expansion of Accelerator in Brazil. Turning to EMEA. Adjusted earnings of $110 million rose 33% with adjusted PFOs up 15% on a constant currency basis. Our strategic focus on capital-light, accident and health and life products is delivering results. The cumulative impact of strong sales across multiple markets for the past several years is clearly showing up in adjusted PFO and adjusted earnings growth.

Before I move on, we made the difficult decision to divest our business in Ukraine, a phenomenal example of resilience in the face of the most challenging circumstances. Going forward, this market-leading franchise will be even better positioned to continue its growth trajectory with its new regional parent. Now shifting to MetLife Investment Management, or MIM. The new segment delivered adjusted earnings of $47 million, an increase of 68% following the first fully integrated quarter post the PineBridge acquisition. Institutional client assets under management decreased 1.9% sequentially during the quarter, mostly due to market depreciation in equity and public fixed income as well as modest net third-party outflows. MIM’s pipeline and forward commitments look strong, particularly within private assets.

Let me briefly touch on artificial intelligence, which continues to play an important role in advancing our new frontier strategy strengthening how we run the company and driving growth and efficiency. Over the past 5 years, we’ve invested more than $3.2 billion to simplify and modernize our technology ecosystem. That investment is delivering tangible at scale benefits for our customers, associates and operations. As we continue to adopt AI responsibly, we’re improving how we make decisions, enhancing how we serve customers and reducing friction across the enterprise. Our work to embed AI across core operations, combined with consistent execution is reducing complexity and costs while driving productivity and supporting growth and can be seen in the steady improvement in our direct expense ratio.

For our customers, AI helps us respond faster, provide more relevant guidance and make our products easier to understand, leading to increased uptake. Above all, governance and risk oversight are built into how we deploy AI, which is paramount given the trust placed in us by our customers. Shifting to cash and capital, we’ve been active on a number of capital management fronts. First, we repurchased roughly $750 million of MetLife common shares and paid common dividends of around $370 million for a total of roughly $1.1 billion returned to shareholders in the quarter. We repurchased nearly another $200 million of net common shares in April, and we have $1.1 billion remaining on our existing authorization. Second, signaling our financial strength and flexibility, our Board of Directors announced a 4.4% increase in MetLife’s common dividend per share.

And finally, during the quarter, we opportunistically issued $1 billion of subordinated debt to support our balance sheet and provide growth capital. At its height, the offering was oversubscribed more than 5 times and was issued at tight relative spreads, indicating the value and confidence that the fixed income market attributes to MetLife’s balance sheet. It’s important to note, we executed these capital actions while also funding the quarter’s substantial organic business growth, and we closed the quarter with $3.9 billion of cash at our holding companies, which is at the top end of our $3 billion to $4 billion liquidity target buffer. Before I close, I would like to take a moment to welcome Dan Glaser and Michelle Seitz who joined MetLife’s Board of Directors in February.

I am confident that Dan’s deep experience in the insurance industry and Michelle’s track record across investment management will serve MetLife’s shareholders well. In closing, this was an excellent quarter that illustrates the investment case for MetLife. Under New Frontier, the decisions we are making and the actions we are taking continue to translate into durable earnings power, capital flexibility and attractive risk-adjusted returns across cycles. Our New Frontier strategy is deeply informed by the environment around us. From demographic shifts and higher interest rates, the convergence of insurance and asset management to the rapid proliferation of AI, we are positioning MetLife to benefit from these forces in a measured commercially disciplined way.

We are pleased with the fast start to the year. This quarter’s performance strengthens our confidence in the outlook we have shared and reinforces our belief that New Frontier is the right strategy at the right time. With that, I’ll turn it over to John to walk through the results in more detail.

John McCallion: Thank you, Michel, and good morning, everyone. As Michel mentioned, this quarter reflects not just strong headline results, but the continued strength of our earnings quality, through strong growth, disciplined underwriting, expense control and prudent capital management. So I’ll walk through the first quarter results, including updates on our investment portfolio and will do so using the Q1 earnings call presentation. We’ll start on Page 3. MetLife is off to a very strong start to the year, benefiting from the strength of our diversified, market-leading businesses, disciplined capital management and an ongoing efficiency mindset. In the first quarter, adjusted EPS grew 23%, while adjusted ROE reached 17% at the top end of our 15% to 17% target range.

And our direct expense ratio was 11.9%, beating our 12.1% 2026 annual target. Net income totaled $1.1 billion, or $1.74 per share, while adjusted earnings for the quarter were $1.6 billion, or $2.42 per share. The primary difference between net income and adjusted earnings was net investment losses, primarily stemming from normal trading activity within the fixed maturity portfolio. This quarter, we experienced a higher amount of trading losses because of a more substantial amount of portfolio rotations. In addition, this line included a modest loss as a result of a sale of a portion of our private equity limited partnership interest. As we’ve seen signs of improvement in the private equity secondary markets, we opportunistically divested roughly $750 million of private equity assets at the end of Q1 at a modest discount.

The transaction structure, like previous secondary sales we’ve completed, will allow MetLife Investment Management to continue managing the assets from the sale. While this is a prudent approach to managing our investment allocation, it also supports growth in our third-party asset management business. Moving to Page 4. We present adjusted earnings for each segment and Corporate and Other, showing a total year-over-year increase of 18% and 15% in constant currency to $1.6 billion, driven by higher variable investment income, strong volume growth and favorable underwriting margins, partially offset by lower recurring interest margins. Adjusted earnings per share were $2.42, up 23% and 20% on a constant currency basis with strong earnings growth supported by disciplined capital management.

Now moving to the businesses. Group Benefits adjusted earnings were $439 million, up 19% year-over-year, largely driven by favorable life underwriting and volume growth. The Group Life mortality ratio was 80.1% for the quarter, better than our 2026 target range of 83% to 88%, reflecting continued favorable mortality trends among the working age population. Our nonmedical health interest adjusted benefit ratio was 75.8%, which was above our annual target range of 70% to 75%, in line with seasonally higher expectations for Dental. Within disability, higher average severity also impacted the quarter, along with higher incidence from paid family leave. Group Benefits had strong sales in the quarter, up 15%, primarily driven by growth across both core and voluntary products.

Adjusted PFOs increased 2%, reflecting underlying growth of approximately 4%, partially offset by a 2-point headwind from participating contracts, which have limited impact on earnings. RIS adjusted earnings were $451 million, up 11% year-over-year, primarily driven by higher variable investment income and favorable underwriting margins. Mortality in our annuity business was lower compared to Q1 of ’25; however, underwriting margins remained elevated due to a large structured settlement contract reserve release in the quarter. Despite RIS’ strong results in Q1, we still expect full year adjusted earnings to be between $1.6 billion to $1.8 billion that we provided on our outlook call. Total investment spread was 119 basis points at the top end of our 100 to 120 basis points guidance range.

Core spread ex VII was in line with expectations at 95 basis points and down 4 basis points sequentially, as we continued rotating the large Q4 inflows, primarily from PRT mandates. RIS continues to benefit from the strength of its origination platform. While top line metrics were masked by a tough compare versus the prior year quarter, which had PRT inflows of $1.8 billion, RIS adjusted PFOs, excluding PRTs, were up 58%, driven by strong growth in U.K. longevity reinsurance, post-retirement benefits and structured settlements. Asia adjusted earnings were $487 million, up 31%. The primary drivers were higher variable investment income and strong volume growth. Asia’s key top line growth metrics continued their strong momentum in Q1. General account assets under management at amortized costs were up 7% on a constant currency basis.

A key driver were Asia sales, which were up 22% on a constant currency basis, primarily driven by Japan and Korea, reflecting the traction that we are seeing from new product launches in both markets all while maintaining pricing and underwriting discipline throughout. Latin America adjusted earnings were $229 million, up 5% year-over-year. On a constant currency basis, adjusted earnings were down 9%, reflecting the Mexico VAT change and less favorable taxes versus the prior year quarter, which more than offset strong volume growth across the region and favorable underwriting. Latin America delivered strong top line growth, with adjusted PFOs up 25% or 11% on a constant currency basis. And sales were up 20% on a constant currency basis, driven by strong growth in Brazil, Mexico and Chile, a clear indicator of sustained demand and continued execution across this franchise.

EMEA adjusted earnings were $110 million, up 33% and 28% on a constant currency basis, primarily driven by robust volume growth. Adjusted PFOs increased 19%, or 15% on a constant currency basis, and sales rose by 17% on a constant currency basis, with broad-based growth across the region. The strong top line growth over the last several years is translating into a stronger, more consistent earnings power. Turning to MetLife Investment Management, or MIM. Adjusted earnings were $47 million in the first quarter, up from $28 million a year ago and in line with the outlook we provided in February. The primary drivers were business growth, including the acquisition of PineBridge and favorable expense margins. With the first quarter reflecting seasonally higher expenses, we expect adjusted earnings to improve as the year progresses, aided by the continued progress integrating the PineBridge business.

Institutional client outflows were approximately $2 billion during the quarter, reflecting elevated market volatility and the impact of bringing the 2 platforms together. However, outflows have stabilized the latter part of Q1 and so far in April, and we’re seeing a solid pipeline ahead. Corporate and Other reported an adjusted loss of $177 million in the first quarter compared to a loss of $129 million a year ago. The year-over-year change was driven by foregone earnings from the prior year strategic reinsurance transactions, lower recurring interest margins and less favorable expense margins. This was partially offset by higher variable investment income. And the company’s effective tax rate on adjusted earnings in the quarter was 24% at the bottom end of our 2026 guidance range of 24% to 26%.

Now we’ll move to Page 5. This chart reflects our pretax variable investment income for the 4 quarters of 2025 and the first quarter of 2026, which was $518 million. The higher than implied quarterly run rate in Q1 was driven by private equities, which had an average return of 2.9%, while real estate and other funds had an average return of 0.8%. As a reminder, PE and real estate and other funds are reported on a one quarter lag and accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. On Page 6, we provide VII post-tax by segment and Corporate and Other for the 4 quarters of 2025 and Q1 of ’26. Most of the VII assets are concentrated in Asia, RIS and Corporate and Other, consistent with the long-term nature of these obligations. As of March 31, 2026, total VII assets stood at $18.2 billion.

Asia represented nearly half of these assets, while RIS and Corporate and Other accounted for about 30% and 20%, respectively. As always, we manage the business assuming a normalized level of VII over time and remain comfortable with our full year outlook. Now let’s discuss our private fixed income portfolio on Page 7. We’ve been investing in private assets, including private fixed income for decades with a proven track record of disciplined underwriting, strong governance and alignment with our liability profile. This chart shows our private fixed income portfolio, valued at approximately $85 billion as of March 31. The majority of these investments are in traditional private placement and infrastructure. Like our general account, this portfolio is high quality, around 95% is investment grade.

It’s well diversified and built to perform across market cycles. We also have limited exposure to segments generating the greatest attention in today’s market. We have no exposure to business development companies, or BDCs, and our middle market loan exposure is under 1% of our general account. Lastly, private assets offer a strong relative value, especially when matched with our long-term illiquid liabilities. With prudent management, these assets deliver extra returns through direct origination, stronger covenants and collateral protections. Now let me turn to Page 8. Here we provide a summary of our software and software-related investments. We’ve cast a wide net here to comprehensively address this area of focus. We have a deliberately minor allocation in a highly diversified portfolio, across both direct and indirect investment.

The portfolio is predominantly investment grade, diversified by issuer, structure and strategy and positioned high in the capital structure. Our $2.5 billion direct exposure, or 0.6% of our general account, is largely concentrated in market-leading, well-capitalized technology companies with robust liquidity profiles. The $6.3 billion of indirect exposure representing 1.4% of our general account is diversified across funds and structures with credit protections and conservative positioning that limit downside risk. Within private equity, software exposure totals $1.3 billion, spread across a highly diversified set of investments, where returns and cash flows will naturally vary across the investments. And most of our venture capital exposure of $3.5 billion is skewed towards AI firms, which are benefiting from higher valuations and contributed positively to returns this quarter.

For example, our venture capital portfolio generated a 6.8% return this quarter. In short, our software exposure is intentional, well controlled and not an area of concern from a risk or capital perspective. Now turning to expenses on Page 9. Our direct expense ratio was 11.9% in the Q1 of ’26, ahead of our full year target of 12.1%. This compares with 11.7% for the full year 2025 and 12% in the first quarter of last year. This quarter’s performance was driven by strong PFO growth and continued expense discipline, which allowed us to successfully absorb the roughly 50 basis point impact from the PineBridge acquisition that we previously disclosed, while still coming in ahead of target. We continue to manage expenses on a full year basis, and this quarter reinforces confidence in our ability to deliver against our 2026 target.

Moving to Slide 10. MetLife continues to operate from a position of strong capital and robust liquidity. As of March 31, cash and liquid assets at the holding companies totaled $3.9 billion toward the high end of our target cash buffer range of $3 billion to $4 billion. During the first quarter, we returned approximately $1.1 billion to shareholders, including approximately $750 million of share repurchases. And we repurchased approximately $200 million of additional shares in April. Our capital actions reflect confidence in both the near-term earnings and long-term free cash flow durability. For our U.S. companies, our 2025 combined NAIC RBC ratio was 379%, well above our target ratio of 360%. Preliminary first quarter 2026 statutory operating earnings were approximately $610 million with net income of approximately $170 million.

And our estimated U.S. statutory adjusted capital, on an NAIC basis, was approximately $16.2 billion as of March 31, down 5% from year-end ’25, primarily due to seasonally higher U.S. entity dividends paid in Q1, partially offset by operating earnings. And finally, in Japan, we expect our initial economic solvency ratio, or ESR, to be in the middle of our 170% to 190% target range for fiscal year ending March 2026, following completion of regulatory filings in June. In summary, MetLife delivered an excellent first quarter, reflecting disciplined execution across the enterprise, as we enter year 2 of our New Frontier strategy. Broad-based top line growth, strong returns and expense discipline underscores the quality and the durability of earnings, while strong capital, liquidity and free cash flow support disciplined and consistent capital management.

Our high-quality, well-diversified investment portfolio, built on decades of private asset experience and risk management, positions us well through market cycles, with limited exposure to areas under the greatest scrutiny. Taken together, these results reinforce our confidence in MetLife’s ability to compound value over time and deliver attractive, dependable returns for shareholders. And with that, I will turn the call back to the operator for your questions.

Q&A Session

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Suneet Kamath with Jefferies.

Suneet Kamath: I wanted to start on Group Life, I guess, for Ramy. We’ve seen working age mortality trend has been improving, I guess, for a couple of years now. And I’m just wondering if you’ve done some more work in terms of what’s driving that and if you think this trend that we’ve seen is sustainable. I don’t think we can hear the answer, at least I can’t.

Ramy Tadros: Yes, sorry. Let me — hold on a second. Suneet, can you hear me now?

Suneet Kamath: I can.

Ramy Tadros: Okay. Sorry, we had a problem with the mic here. So thank you for the question. And let me just give you maybe a bit of color on the quarter and then give you a sense of how we think about the sustainability of the results. We’re very pleased with the results in the quarter. We’ve got about 2 points of favorable prior quarter development coming through. We did see about another 0.5 point of favorable severity, which can kind of fluctuate quarter-to-quarter. And as you noted, we are also seeing overall favorable working age mortality when you look at the CDC data. Look, there’s a lot of different potential drivers for that favorability. Some include a pull-forward effect from a COVID perspective, some include the impact of GLP-1 drugs, and there are a lot of other pieces that we’re researching and looking into, which I’m not going to go through all the details right now.

But when you step back and think about what this means for our results, keep a couple of points in mind. One is while we operate in a competitive environment, this is also a market where we particularly can differentiate on factors beyond price. So we talked about the strategy in terms of how we bring our value proposition to our clients, especially those who are looking to do more with fewer. So life insurance is often bundled with other coverages such as disability and dental and voluntary, and this allows us, from a bundling perspective, to look at overall customer profitability and protect overall margins. And from a specific life perspective, if the favorability that we see does persist and does become credible on these RIS, we would expect some portion of it to flow back into pricing, but that would happen gradually over time.

So think of that happening in years, not quarters, if you think about our underwriting ratio. I hope that helps.

Suneet Kamath: Yes, that’s helpful. And I guess maybe shifting gears to Japan, it seems like we’re seeing a lot more actions by regulators in that country. And I think the secondy issue that you are part of. I think, it’s an industry-wide issue. But I’m just curious if you can give us an update on what’s going on there and if you’re aware of any other reviews by the regulators that could impact Met’s franchise there.

Lyndon Oliver: Suneet, it’s Lyndon here. So look, this issue, as you described, has impacted several companies across the industry. And we obviously take this matter very seriously. We’ve conducted a very comprehensive review all across the company. All the seconded employees have returned to their positions, and we’ve discontinued the practice. And we take lots of steps to kind of work with our customers, our partners and regulators to resolve the issue. And all the details of the review we’ve undertaken, all the corrective actions that we put in place can be found on our website. We’re in conversations with the FSA about lots of different things. The press release noted we had a reporting order, but all our discussions with the regulators continue to be confidential right now.

John McCallion: Yes. And I think just to add to that, Suneet, I mean, just to reemphasize, it’s an industry issue, we’re not seeing any impact on our business and results and sales, as you saw in the quarter. So I think, as Lyndon said, which kind of — we’re working through it, where all of us, like the whole industry, are working through addressing this with the regulator. And I think we don’t see this as anything with any specific company. It’s more just a change in industry practice.

Operator: Our next question comes from Ryan Krueger with KBW.

Ryan Krueger: Maybe I’ll start with an opposite side of a Japan question. You had quite strong sales there. Can you talk a little bit more about the positive dynamics you’re seeing that drove this? And how you’re thinking about the rest of the year?

Lyndon Oliver: Yes. It’s Lyndon. Let me take that. So look, we did have a very strong quarter. We’re very pleased with the performance we’ve seen in the quarter. Sales are up 22% year-over-year. So let me give you some color about Japan and the rest of Asia. So let’s start with Japan. Sales in Japan were up 26% year-over-year, and that’s really driven by distribution strength across all of our channels. We’ve also benefited from very successful product launches in the quarter. We saw life sales grow. That was driven by the yen variable product as well as a U.S. dollar single premium product. In the A&H products, we launched a new product in the quarter, and A&H sales were actually up 77% year-over-year. So strong performance in the yen A&H portfolio.

When we look at annuity sales, they remained steady against what was a very strong comparative in the prior year, but we continue to see some momentum in U.S. dollar single premium products. An important dynamic for the quarter was our mix of business, between yen and dollar products, was close to 50-50, reflecting a very diversified product portfolio. Now going to the rest of Asia, sales there were up 18% year-over-year. And here, Korea was a key driver. Sales growth was up 44%. And here, too, we saw momentum in our U.S. dollar sales, where we’ve been able to leverage what we’ve done in Japan with U.S. dollar product as well as our investment expertise and take it to Korea. And then, we also saw strength in our Korean won product there, and that was driven primarily by the strong macroeconomic environment, particularly the rising equity markets.

So we’re off to a strong start for the quarter. Now looking ahead, we can expect a little bit of moderation in year-over-year growth rates just given the strong prior year comparatives, but we really expect the momentum we have to continue going into the second quarter.

Ryan Krueger: And on non-medical health, could you give us a little more color on the key drivers that impacted this quarter? And also just how you’re thinking about the rest of the year?

Ramy Tadros: Sure, Ryan. It’s Ramy here. So if you think about the quarter, 3 kind of drivers I would point to. First is dental, very much performing in line with our expectations. We did observe the seasonally higher dental utilization coming through in the quarter, which does impact the ratio, and we would expect utilization to moderate in the second half of the year, and that’s kind of consistent with historical trends. For disability, we did experience higher disability claims. Those were coming from the impact of new state-mandated paid family leave programs. These new programs have a claim pattern with higher upfront claims that tend to normalize. So here again, we would expect that impact to also moderate in the second half of the year.

And then the third factor, which John referenced in his prepared remarks, we did see slightly elevated severity in LTD. And it’s important to note that while this was elevated on a year-to-year basis, when we look at it sequentially, it was actually flat over the last 3 quarters. So we don’t really see any evidence of a trend here in terms of severity and very much in line with kind of quarterly fluctuations that we would see. So if you put all of these pieces together, from an aggregate perspective, back to your question, we would expect this ratio to moderate, but look for that moderation in the second half of the year, if you think that coming through our numbers.

Operator: Our next question comes from Wes Carmichael with Wells Fargo.

Wesley Carmichael: First question was on RIS spread. I think the core spread declined a little bit sequentially. But you’ve also brought on a lot of new business from PRT and other products over the past couple of quarters. So any help on how you’re thinking about core yield or spread? And how that should trend if there’s any uplift from deploying some of that cash or reallocating some assets going forward?

John McCallion: Yes. Thanks for the question. Wes, it’s John. So as you mentioned, RIS spreads for the quarter were 119 basis points and down about 5 basis points in total sequentially, but honestly, at the top end of our 100 to 120 basis point guidance range, VII contributed about 24 basis points. So that was essentially flat, which reflected, obviously, our strong private equity performance. And so if you exclude VII, core spreads were 95 basis points. And that 4 basis points of sequential decline was largely in line with expectations we discussed in February. As we had guided, there was — obviously, we had a large volume of new flows in 4Q, primarily from the PRT mandates. That created a bit of a headwind in Q1, as we continue to rotate that portion of the — or a portion of the portfolio.

And so as we look ahead into 2Q, we do expect some improvement from lower asset rotations, but we’re also operating in an environment where the yield curve remains persistently flat with the short end higher than maybe relative to our outlook expectation of the curve steepening. So that actually puts a bit of a headwind on us. I think taken all together, our expectation for Q2 is that core spreads will remain close to where we are in Q1, maybe slightly above, modest improvement in Q2. And total spreads will continue to track to our full year range.

Wesley Carmichael: Got it. And second, I guess, Sun Life issued a press release last week that they’re settling a class action lawsuit with policyholders. In their release, I guess, they noted that they can seek recourse from MetLife for, I guess, around CAD 200 million on a gross basis. So — I realize that’s small, but just wanted to see if that’s something that we should be thinking about as a near-term impact on MetLife.

Michel Khalaf: Wes, it’s Michel. Thanks for the question. So I think I believe you’re referring to the April 30 press release by Sun Life. The claims made by Sun Life can best be characterized as baseless and misleading. MetLife was not named a defendant in the reference class action suit. And Sun Life has taken no legal action to enforce the alleged indemnity claim against MetLife. As a matter of fact, there are currently no legal proceedings between the parties. We vigorously dispute that we owe Sun Life any indemnity whatsoever for the claims made in the underlying settlement. And the last thing I would say is that Sun Life and only Sun Life is responsible for its own decisions and actions in this matter.

Operator: Our next question comes from Tom Gallagher with Evercore.

Thomas Gallagher: First one, John, the — did you say $170 million of stat net income in 1Q? And if so, anything in particular that was weighing on that result? And how — maybe more broadly, how are you feeling about capital generation to start the year overall?

John McCallion: Yes. Tom, yes, on stat capital, I mentioned in the opening remarks, we had about a 4% decline in the quarter. And the largest reason for that is, as I mentioned, dividend seasonality for our U.S. entities. We typically take a larger dividend in the first quarter. And then while dividends from our non-U.S. entities have weighted more heavily towards the remaining quarter. So that’s typically been a historical practice for us around capital management throughout the year. I think importantly, nothing has really changed in terms of our capital trajectory or capital generation. I mean, we continue to demonstrate a free cash flow ratio of 65% to 75% and remain confident to do that throughout New Frontier. Finally, in 2025, we saw an RBC ratio of 379%, well above our 360%.

So very much in line with where we’ve operated over the last several years. And overall, we believe this continues to reflect our strong capital resilience and discipline, and there’s nothing really to call out. I mean, you saw some normal, I’d say, level of credit losses in the quarter, a little higher trading losses and just — kind of just general seasonality of Q1. And you can go back and see that it’s pretty consistent with prior quarters.

Thomas Gallagher: Got you. My follow-up is I just want to ask a higher-level strategy question on the investment side. How are you — what are you thinking about things? And I know you had some reallocations going on with PRT and the like. But if — I guess starting on your commercial mortgage loan portfolio, I noticed you’ve been shrinking that a lot. So it looks like you’re not originating as much on that side or at least retaining as much on that side. So I take that to mean you’re a little more cautious going forward on the CML side. Where are you reallocating? And where are you more bullish? Is it private credit? Or just a little bit of color on what are you thinking more broadly about where you’re looking to allocate new dollars?

John McCallion: Yes. Tom, it’s a good point. And I think like with any environment and in the way we approach it is, obviously, we think about relative value, right? And we — this is why it’s so important to have a diversified platform where you have strength and capabilities across a number of asset classes because quite honestly, some asset classes can look more challenging at different times. I’d say just on your point of real estate, we are continuing to see an environment there, where we have seen liquidity and price discovery pick up, and we expect this trend to continue through the year. And it’s helped kind of normalize pricing and things like that. And so there are, I’d say, improving opportunities, but surprisingly, new issuance and new origination spreads are still relatively tight.

So we’re being selective when it comes to that, and we think that’s the best approach in this asset class. To your question about what else are we looking at, I think we have a variety of different capabilities within the private assets. Asset-backed financing probably is one of the places where we’re seeing opportunities for risk-adjusted returns that are very strong. But I think within each asset class, we can find it, but maybe at broad themes around sectors, that’s probably on a relative scale place that is showing better value.

Operator: Your next question comes from Joel Hurwitz with Dowling.

Joel Hurwitz: First one on MIM with PineBridge now on board. Can you maybe talk about the outlook for flows or provide some more color on the strong pipeline that you mentioned in your prepared remarks? And then, can you also talk about the ability to leverage some of the international distribution that comes with that acquisition?

John McCallion: Joel, it’s John. Look, I’d just start out by saying we’re very excited about what’s ahead for MetLife Investment Management. This is the first quarter post acquisition. And while it’s still early, we’re really encouraged by the progress that we’ve seen across integration, client engagement, pipeline development. From an integration perspective, we really were focused on being quick and deliberate out of the gate. We announced a new MIM leadership team, which took a combination of both firms. We’re in process of consolidating key investment platforms to drive operating synergies. And then, we’ve started out of the gate being focused on being a 1 MIM platform. And — that was really — holistically, that was a strategic rationale for bringing these 2 firms together.

And we’ve been proactive with clients and consultants in terms of our outreach and our vision, talking about these investment capabilities, and the feedback has been consistently positive. We’re seeing really some great opportunities for early signs of cross-selling to begin to emerge. And so I think — I’d just say, overall, the early days have just continued to reinforce the strategic fit of PineBridge. In terms of new pipeline, I’d say it’s well diversified. We see some being committed, new commitments. We have opportunities for deploying capital under our existing mandates. We have some late-stage client activity. So I think, all in all, as you know, with the institutional asset management, it can be inherently lumpy and episodic at times.

But I think what we’re really excited about the engagement and the momentum that we’re seeing is very positive and highly constructive, and we’re just seeing those — these opportunities develop across asset classes and geographies. As you point out, one of the attractive things about PineBridge coming together is they really brought an international non-U.S. footprint to us. About 50% of their AUM is outside the U.S. So we spend a lot of time with the teams kind of thinking about how we can, as I said earlier, think about those cross-sell opportunities, and we’re finding a lot of opportunities out of the gate. So just as we step back, despite this being early integration, and there’s some natural, I’d say — I’ll say, early day consolidating situations that occur in terms of flows, we feel very good about the demand that’s there for our products, the depth of the pipeline that we’re seeing and our ability to continue to generate new net flows.

Joel Hurwitz: Got it. That was very helpful. And maybe, Ramy, can you just talk about what you’re seeing from a competitive landscape across the various markets you play in, in the group space? And just any color on sort of the drivers of the top line and group ex participating policies being towards the lower end of your target range?

Ramy Tadros: Thanks, Joel. Maybe let me just hit about — hit the top line question first. So as we described before, participating policies do impact PFOs, but don’t really impact our earnings. So we always like to think about the true measure of top line growth is one that does exclude participating policies. And in this quarter, we saw slightly over 4% growth using that metric. And as the industry leader, continuing to grow at these levels, and if you look at it in absolute terms, we’re certainly very pleased with our growth rate here. And look, while we compete in a competitive environment, we have a value proposition that’s resonating in the marketplace and continuing to deliver for our customers, and therefore, deliver for our shareholders.

So from a driver’s perspective, it’s really been hitting on all cylinders this quarter. We have improved persistency. That was broad-based, particularly evident in our dental book. We’ve also achieved all of that persistency while meeting our expectations in terms of rate actions across the business. Very strong momentum in terms of sales, broad-based across core and voluntary. And we continue to drive our strategy that we talked about at Investor Day from a re-enrollment perspective. We talked about those twin gaps of a confusion gap and a protection gap and how our ability to bridge them is going to drive better enrollment results, and we’re seeing that with double-digit voluntary product growth in our portfolio. So all over, I would say, as the industry leader with clear competitive differentiators, we’re very pleased with the top line momentum here.

Operator: Your next question comes from Tracy Benguigui with Wolfe Research.

Tracy Benguigui: I just want to go back to MIM. You mentioned some third-party outflows. Did that come from PineBridge deflections or somewhere else?

John McCallion: Yes. No, I think it’s a mix, right? So there were — we did have some expected post-close activity, I’ll call it, early in the quarter. And then also, we had, just as you would typically have, client allocation shifts that are unusual to start the year. So it’s a mix of both.

Tracy Benguigui: Got it. And just appreciate an update on your annuity reinsurance flow. How many cedents are you part of that right now?

Ramy Tadros: Tracy, we have, as of this point, 2 partners that we’re working closely with on the reinsurance side. And just — I would just give you a bit more color on that is we’re working with partners who appreciate what we can bring to the table in terms of our financial strength, investment capabilities, liquidity and capital flexibility. But I would also say, we are also very selective in terms of who we partner with because we look at the quality of the liabilities being originated, and in particular, we look at the cost of funding for those liabilities. And so we think these are win-win partnerships and really speaks to the strategy of looking to go after adjacencies, which play to our strength. And — Michel mentioned that in his opening remarks in terms of retail reinsurance.

The other adjacency that we’re seeing a lot of tailwinds in is the U.K. funded reinsurance. And on a year-to-date between those 2 pieces, we have $2 billion of inflows here, and these are businesses that were basically started from scratch from Investor Day to sitting here today 18 months later.

Operator: Our next question comes from Pablo Singzon with JPMorgan.

Pablo Singzon: First, could you comment about your outlook for EMEA? Earnings were above the quarterly run rate you had provided before. And operations that don’t seem to be affected by what’s going on in the Middle East. So I’m just curious how you’re seeing the rest of the year unfold there.

John McCallion: Just to make sure, Pablo, you said EMEA. Is that what you said?

Pablo Singzon: Yes, that’s correct, John. Just earnings being stronger and operations not being affected by the conflict in the Middle East?

Michel Khalaf: Pablo, it’s Michel again. So yes, we’re really, really pleased with EMEA’s performance. And I would say that’s been building over a couple of years now, where strong sales growth is translating into PFO growth and earnings growth as well. I think that’s also reflective of the highly efficient structure that we have in EMEA, especially in Europe. With regard to the situation in the Middle East, just to give you a sense of EMEA’s earnings, about 2/3 come from Europe, 1/3 from the rest of the region. And about 50% of that 1/3 comes from Turkey and Egypt. So clearly, we’ve been keeping a close eye on what’s happening in the region. Our first order priority is the safety and well-being of our associates there. So far, we have not seen any impact.

And I think EMEA’s performance in the quarter is — provides evidence of that. And we think that, provided the situation stabilizes from here, we’re not going to see any impact. And if we do, they’re not going to be material to EMEA overall and certainly not to MetLife’s overall results as well.

John McCallion: And I would just add, Pablo, just in terms of outlook, we probably — obviously, this is a very strong quarter. I wouldn’t consider this to be a run rate where we had a $90 million to $100 million quarterly run rate as part of the outlook. And we’re probably trending towards the middle to upper end of that range is where we — going forward.

Pablo Singzon: That’s clear. And then my second question, disability, maybe for Ramy again. Do you think the trends you’ve seen so far, right? You called out severity, paid families, would those require repricing beyond normal course? And I guess, how do you frame how you might be positioning the book today versus the past several years when results for the industry were just very strong?

Lyndon Oliver: Yes. Well, just in terms of our overall approach for pricing here, we have the ability to reprice about 50% of the book every year in terms of our disability book. And that’s driven by a combination of would be client-specific experience as well as our outlook. I would say from an LTD perspective, what we’ve seen from a 1 quarter of severity this quarter, and I talked about this being flattish over the last 3 quarters, we’re not seeing any evidence that would say — would merit an overall repricing of the book. Outside of the severity that we talked about, the performance is very much in line with our expectations, be it in terms of incidence or closure or recovery rates. So we feel pretty good about where the book sits today, but we’ll continue to monitor this and clearly reflect an individual customer by customer experience.

And then for the paid family medical leave, I talked about the nature of the product. I think of it as an expanded STD product, and I talked about the front-end nature of those claims. Clearly, as we get a more credible experience as we get into the outer quarters, we will look at repricing actions as needed. But the front-end nature of this isn’t a surprise to us. It’s — this is how these plans effectively work. And again, I’ll come back to the fact that we can reprice about 50% of this business every year. So think of this as a BAU in terms of hitting our target margins and our pricing actions.

Operator: That is all the time we have for questions today. I will now turn the call back to John Hall for closing remarks.

John Hall: Thank you, everybody, for joining us this morning, and have a great day.

Operator: This concludes today’s call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.