Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

MannKind Corporation (MNKD): To Infinity And Beyond?

This week, MannKind Corporation (NASDAQ:MNKD) published a set of frequently asked questions about the recent clinical trials for its inhaled insulin Afrezza.

 MannKind Corporation (NASDAQ:MNKD)

The idea inspired me to issue my own questions about the company, using the questions as a crutch to explain my position. Unlike MannKind Corporation (NASDAQ:MNKD), though, my questions are of the rare variety; most have never been directly asked to me:

Can you summarize MannKind Corporation (NASDAQ:MNKD)’s frequently asked questions?

I can.

Will you?

Oh sure:

1. The company thinks the clinical trial data is enough to get Afrezza approved. Deerfield, which MannKind Corporation (NASDAQ:MNKD) has a financing deal with, also likes the data. If Deerfield and its consultants were employed by the Food and Drug Administration, MannKind Corporation (NASDAQ:MNKD) would be all set. Unfortunately, while all good signs, there are no guarantees of an approval.

2. The efficacy data for the older MedTone inhaler doesn’t matter (the safety comparison was what the FDA wanted), but in case you were wondering, it worked as well as it has in the past and essentially the same as the new Dreamboat inhaler.

Also, the analyst that said MedTone efficacy data is important doesn’t deserve the title of analyst. I’m paraphrasing, but I think that’s what MannKind Corporation (NASDAQ:MNKD) was getting at with its comment that “it is disheartening that anyone who holds themselves out to be an analyst would use subjective and alarmist language with respect to such a minor result.”

3. The severe hypoglycemia events trended in the right direction for Afrezza versus Novo Nordisk A/S (ADR) (NYSE:NVO)‘s Novolog, but wasn’t statistically significant. As I pointed out after the data was presented, fewer severe hypoglycemia events would have been very helpful for marketing, but in order for MannKind to claim the difference is real, it would have had to run a larger trial to observe more events.

4. MannKind hypothesizes that the relative weight gain comparing Afrezza to placebo in type 2 diabetics has to do with the options that patients had to reduce blood sugar levels. The placebo group could only lower the level by improving their diet while the group taking Afrezza could reduce their blood sugar after a meal by taking the drug, so they didn’t lose weight. The explanation seems reasonable to me, and doctors might buy it as well since, in the real-world setting, type 2 diabetics don’t typically lose as much weight as the placebo group did in the study.

5. While MannKind had powered the study in type 2 diabetics to detect change in HbA1c of 0.5 percentage points to show superiority against placebo, that threshold makes some assumptions that didn’t turn out exactly as expected (they rarely do). The way the data unfolded, a change of 0.4 percentage points was sufficient to show statistical significance.

6. In type 1 diabetics, the drop in HbA1c levels for patients taking Afrezza is smaller than for those taking Novolog, but MannKind argues that it’s misleading because HbA1c level is a proxy for the long-term average blood sugar level. If patients are seeing more hypoglycemic events — low blood sugar levels — you’d expect them to have lower HbA1c levels, but that’s not necessarily a good thing since extremely low blood sugar levels are dangerous. It’s a reasonable argument, but it would have more weight if the severe hypoglycemia events was statistically significant (see #3).

7. Don’t listen to patients who post on message boards. Of course, there’s this one guy who loves us, and he was in our trial. There’s nothing to be learned from individual patients. But he still loves us.

8. Officers didn’t sell shares in mid-August, but instead the company withheld shares from their vested shares that are part of the officers’ compensation packages.

Did you learn anything from MannKind’s frequently asked questions?

No. Clearly, all these people asking these questions — assuming that MannKind didn’t just make up the questions like I have — didn’t listen to the conference call after the data was released. Questions 1 through 6 were covered there and 7 and 8 just seem obvious. But then, I don’t usually frequent message boards.

Should biotechs issue frequently asked questions?

It doesn’t seem like a good idea to me. MannKind is basically saying “we didn’t explain our data very well,” which I really don’t think was the case.

More importantly, investors should wonder why it’s necessary to set the record straight? Afrezza will either be approved or not, and the shares will presumably go up if the drug will be approved. Between now and then, the only reason I can think of for the company wanting a higher price is so it can sell more shares.

So, will it be approved?

I think so. Granted, we don’t have all the data, and we only get MannKind’s side of its conversations with the FDA, but so far I haven’t seen any red flags.

To infinity and beyond?

Not so fast. Getting approved is only half the battle. Afrezza is arguably a better insulin than Novolog or Eli Lilly & Co. (NYSE:LLY)‘s Humalog, but competing with the fast-acting insulins won’t be easy. Doctors are comfortable prescribing injected insulin, and it’s going to be hard to get them to convert to a new delivery method. Novo Nordisk A/S (ADR) (NYSE:NVO) and Eli Lilly & Co. (NYSE:LLY) don’t look particularly worried, especially since both companies dropped their respective inhaled insulin programs a few years ago.

I don’t think MannKind can do it alone. The biotech needs a partner, and until MannKind is able to find a big diabetes expert to step up and fund the launch, no amount of frequently asked questions will give investors solace.

The article Rarely Asked Questions About MannKind originally appeared on Fool.com is written by Brian Orelli.

Fool contributor Brian Orelli has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

DOWNLOAD FREE REPORT: Warren Buffett's Best Stock Picks

Let Warren Buffett, George Soros, Steve Cohen, and Daniel Loeb WORK FOR YOU.

If you want to beat the low cost index funds by 19 percentage points per year, look no further than our monthly newsletter.In this free report you can find an in-depth analysis of the performance of Warren Buffett's entire historical stock picks. We uncovered Warren Buffett's Best Stock Picks and a way to for Buffett to improve his returns by more than 4 percentage points per year.

Bonus Biotech Stock Pick: You can also find a detailed bonus biotech stock pick that we expect to return more than 50% within 12 months.
Subscribe me to Insider Monkey's Free Daily Newsletter
This is a FREE report from Insider Monkey. Credit Card is NOT required.