Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Lululemon $LULU Falls Short of Estimates, Hedge Funds Lose on News

Lululemon Athletica (LULU) shares fell in trading on Thursday after its sales missed analysts expectations, reports Reuters. Its revenue rose 31% to $230.2 million in the third quarter, falling short of analyst estimates of $235.7 million. LULU closed trading Wednesday at $49.70 to open Thursday at just $42 a share.


The following hedge funds lost the most:

1. Renaissance Technologies – Jim Simons: Lost $8.3 million

2. Jat Capital Management – John Thaler: Lost $3.0 million

3. Tiger Consumer Management – Patrick McCormack: Lost $2.3 million

4. Manatuck Hill Partners – Mark Broach: Lost $1.4 million

5. Vinik Asset Management – Jeffrey Vinik: Lost $1.1 million

6. Hunter Global Investors – Duke Buchan: Lost $1.0 million

7. Driehaus Capital – Richard Driehaus: Lost $495,000

8. Caxton Associates Lp – Bruce Kovner: Lost $410,000

9. Fox Point Capital Management – Charles Anderson: Lost $385,000

10. Aqr Capital Management – Cliff Asness: Lost $373,000

DISCLAIMER: These calculations assume that these hedge funds did not increase or reduce their stock positions in LULU since the end of June. We did not take into account their option positions.