Jim Cramer Recently Looked At These 7 Stocks

5. Oklo Inc. (NYSE:OKLO)

Number of Hedge Fund Holders: 38

Oklo Inc. (NYSE:OKLO) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently looked at. Answering a caller’s query about the stock, Cramer said:

“Okay, that’s a stock that is part of the year of magical investing. That year ended. You need to sell the stock of Oklo. I’m going to give you a twofer. Sell IREN… Why? Because they just did a convert. I don’t want you near that one either.”

Oklo Inc. (NYSE:OKLO) designs advanced fission power plants to deliver scalable clean energy and develops nuclear fuel recycling technology that transforms waste into usable reactor fuel. Cramer highlighted the company during the November 12 episode and commented:

“Maybe you bought OKLO because… I’ve spoken highly about nuclear power. Oklo is working to develop as much nuclear power as possible with smaller form reactors, and the conference call yesterday was extremely bullish and really good. At the same time, though, we got to admit that Oklo is a pre-revenue company with gigantic losses. Even if the federal government starts greenlighting nuclear projects faster than they’re doing now, it could take a decade to build one of these things, and they always seem to have huge cost overruns.

Sure, Oklo could announce a deal to revive power with a major hyperscaler, but who knows when that will come… the stock is up over 400% for the year. As I see it, this more than 400% move is giving you a terrific opportunity to ring the register on part of your position. Now, ideally, you can take out at least your cost basis, then you can let the rest ride. I’m not against that, if you’re still a big believer in nuclear power like I am, but man, it’s over 400% for the year…

Rigetti and Oklo are just two of the hyper speculative companies that I’m referring and referencing when I am talking about the year of magical investing. That era is drawing to a close. If you own them and they’re up very big, have you made money? Only if you’ve sold some. Otherwise, no.”