Solana has spent years establishing itself as the blockchain for speed. While Ethereum prioritised decentralisation and security, Solana optimised for throughput, thousands of transactions per second, fees measured in fractions of a cent, a developer experience built for scale. The network attracted capital, users, and a generation of applications that needed performance Ethereum could not provide. It became the default answer to a specific question: what if blockchain was actually fast?
Gurhan Kiziloz looked at that answer and decided it was incomplete.
BlockDAG, the blockchain Kiziloz founded, is built on a different architecture. Where Solana achieves speed through a novel consensus mechanism and significant hardware requirements for validators, BlockDAG uses a Directed Acyclic Graph structure that allows transactions to be processed in parallel rather than sequentially. The approach is not new in concept, other projects have explored DAG architectures, but the execution Kiziloz is pursuing combines that structure with Proof-of-Work security and compatibility with Ethereum’s smart contract ecosystem.
The result is a blockchain that offers Solana’s speed without what Kiziloz views as its compromises. Solana’s performance comes with trade-offs that have drawn criticism: validator requirements that concentrate power among well-resourced operators, network outages that have interrupted service during periods of high demand, and a Proof-of-Stake model that some argue sacrifices decentralisation for efficiency. BlockDAG retains Proof-of-Work, distributing security across a broader base of participants. It offers EVM compatibility, allowing developers to port applications from Ethereum without rewriting their code. The pitch is straightforward: comparable speed, fewer compromises.
Whether that pitch translates into adoption is the question BlockDAG must now answer. Solana has a head start measured in years. Its ecosystem includes established DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces, and consumer applications with real user bases. Developers have built tooling around its specific architecture. Institutional capital has flowed into its infrastructure. BlockDAG is entering a market where the incumbent is not standing still.
Kiziloz approaches this challenge the same way he approached gaming. When he built Spartans.com, he was competing against Bet365 and Stake, operators with decades of combined experience and resources that dwarfed his own. He competed on execution: faster payouts, cleaner compliance, a product that delivered on the fundamentals. The strategy worked. Spartans became the engine of Nexus International’s $1.2 billion revenue year. Kiziloz is applying the same logic to blockchain.
The operational intensity that defined Nexus is visible at BlockDAG. When leadership did not meet Kiziloz’s expectations, he made changes. The CEO was replaced. Staff who could not maintain the required pace were let go. The restructuring was not gradual or diplomatic. It was immediate. Kiziloz identified what he believed was slowing progress and removed it. The organisation now operates with a team selected for its ability to execute at the speed he demands.
This approach is not without risk. Blockchain development requires sustained technical effort across years. The communities that form around successful networks are built on trust and stability, not just performance. Moving fast can generate momentum, but it can also create turbulence that discourages the developers and users a new blockchain needs to attract. Kiziloz is betting that results will outweigh concerns about process.
The technical foundation he is building gives that bet a reasonable chance. BlockDAG’s parallel processing architecture addresses a genuine limitation in sequential blockchains. Its Proof-of-Work consensus offers security guarantees that Proof-of-Stake networks are still working to prove at scale. Its EVM compatibility lowers the barrier for developers considering migration. These are not theoretical advantages. They are practical differentiators that could attract users if the execution matches the architecture.
Solana will not cede ground easily. Anatoly Yakovenko, its co-founder, has articulated a clear vision for the network’s evolution, continuous improvement, rapid iteration, adaptation to user needs. Solana’s developer community is active and growing. Its brand recognition in the crypto space is substantial. BlockDAG is challenging an opponent that knows how to compete.
But Kiziloz has challenged established players before. He did it in gaming against longer odds and with fewer resources. He emerged with a billion-dollar company and a personal net worth of $1.7 billion. The sceptics who questioned whether he could compete in that industry eventually went quiet. He is now asking the same question in blockchain: can execution and intensity overcome incumbency and scale?
The answer will take time to materialise. Blockchain adoption moves in cycles, and new entrants often take years to establish meaningful market position. Kiziloz has demonstrated patience when required, Nexus did not reach $1.2 billion revenue overnight, but his natural disposition favours speed. BlockDAG will move quickly. Whether quickly is fast enough to catch Solana remains to be seen.
What is clear is that the challenge is serious. BlockDAG is not a whitepaper project or a speculative token launch. It is a blockchain with defined architecture, a funded development effort, and a founder who has already built at scale in another industry. Solana has a new competitor. How it responds, and whether BlockDAG can sustain its momentum, will determine whether the hierarchy of high-performance blockchains remains stable or begins to shift.
Kiziloz is betting on the shift. He usually does.
Disclosure: Insider Monkey doesn’t recommend purchase of any securities/currencies. Insider Monkey received compensation to publish this article. We don’t guarantee the accuracy of the statements made in this article. Insider Monkey and its principals are not affiliated with the client and have no ownership in the client’s business. Insider Monkey doesn’t recommend the purchase/sale of any securities, cryptocurrencies, or ICOs. Please get in touch with a financial professional before making any financial decisions. You understand that Insider Monkey doesn’t accept any responsibility and you will be using the information presented here at your own risk. You acknowledge that this disclaimer is a simplified version of our Terms of Use, and by accessing or using our site, you agree to be bound by all of its terms and conditions. If at any time you find these terms and conditions unacceptable, you must immediately leave the Site and cease all use of the Site.
