Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROAD) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROAD) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript May 8, 2026

Construction Partners, Inc. beats earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $0.18, expectations were $-0.05.

Operator: Greetings, and welcome to the Construction Partners Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce Rick Black, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Rick Black: Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us for the Construction Partners conference call to review second quarter fiscal 2026 results. This call is also being webcast and can be accessed through the audio link on the Events and Presentations page of the Investor Relations section of constructionpartners.net. Information recorded on this call speaks only as of today, May 8, 2026. Please be advised that any time-sensitive information may no longer be accurate as of the date of any replay listening or transcript reading. I would also like to remind you that statements made in today’s discussion that are not historical facts, including statements of expectations or future events or future financial performance are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

We will be making forward-looking statements as part of today’s call that, by their nature, are uncertain and outside of the company’s control. Actual results may differ materially. Please refer to our earnings press release for our disclosure on forward-looking statements. These factors and other risks and uncertainties are described in detail in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management will also refer to non-GAAP measures, including adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin. Reconciliations to the nearest GAAP measures can be found at the end of our earnings press release. Construction Partners assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. And now I would like to turn the call over to Construction Partners’ CEO, Jule Smith.

Jule?

F. Smith: Thank you, Rick, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us for today’s call. With me this morning are Greg Hoffman, our Chief Financial Officer; and Ned Fleming, our Executive Chairman. I’d like to begin by thanking our approximately 7,000 employees for their hard work and excellence in achieving a great second quarter, exceeding profitability expectations and growing backlog, which allows us to meaningfully raise our outlook for FY ’26. While the financial results of focusing on our family of company’s culture are hard to measure, we know that building a great culture does have a real impact on bottom line results. At CPI, we hold ourselves accountable by constantly measuring several key areas of cultural health.

First, we focus on keeping a low turnover of employees, which increases the experience and stability of our workforce. Second, we strive to lower benefit costs, so we maximize the take-home pay to our employees’ families. This helps us attract the most talented folks to our teams across all 110 local markets. And finally, every year, we survey all 7,000 employees for honest and candid feedback, which gives us vision on how to improve and innovate as a company. Maintaining this focus on our culture will continue to drive performance and produce great results. In Q2, we grew revenue, adjusted EBITDA and backlog. Favorable weather in the quarter provided the ability to advance work efficiently and exceed expectations. We play an outdoor game. And when we have dry weather, we can work more days and consequently increase our volumes.

Looking at the cost environment during Q2, energy volatility had a limited impact on results due to the protection of the liquid asphalt index on more than 80% of our total revenue, the physical hedging of diesel fuel and the oil price hedging mechanism inherent to our vertical integration at the liquid asphalt terminals. Today, we source more than 50% of our liquid AC needs internally. As we look to the future relative to building our backlog, our pass-through cost model reacts quickly to rising commodity prices. Turning now to the demand environment. Construction project demand throughout our footprint remains strong for both public infrastructure work as well as commercial development for new construction. Our teams are actively bidding and building a wide range of commercial projects.

A few examples to highlight. In Texas, Four Star Paving is working on a portfolio of eight data center projects totaling approximately $100 million of contract value. In Tennessee, our new acquisition, Four Star Paving currently is working on 12 warehouse projects in the dynamic Metro Nashville market, totaling a contract value of approximately $28 million. And in Alabama, Wiregrass Construction is working on a Mag 7 data center in the Northeast region of the state valued at approximately $4 million. Taken together, these projects reflect an expanded backlog and pipeline of opportunities entering the second half of our fiscal year. These are just a few examples of the approximately 1,000 commercial sector projects we will participate in building this year across our eight and over 110 local markets.

On the public side, both the federal and state governments are continuing their investment in infrastructure to keep up with the growing economies in the Sunbelt. This is particularly true with the small- and medium-sized recurring maintenance projects fora state DOTs, cities and counties that represent a majority of our work. Some examples new public projects include — in the Houston area, Burwood Green has won several multimillion-dollar projects, which are part of the city’s infrastructure preparations for the upcoming FIFA World Cup this summer. North Carolina, Fred Smith Company won a contract for multiple road widenings and improvements valued at approximately $150 million to prepare for the U.S. opens returned to Pinehurst in 2029. And in the Florida Panhandle, CWR is working on a taxiway reconstruction project at Eglin Air Force Base added approximately $27 million.

These projects represent just a few of the different type of public projects we are working on today. With respect to federal funding for the Surface Transportation program, we continue to engage in productive discussions with key members of Congress regarding reauthorization. Encouragingly, both parties and both chambers are actively working to release a markup of the bill this month to advance a new 5-year authorization somewhere in the $500 billion to $600 billion range. This would represent a substantial increase in investment in our nation’s transportation infrastructure. Turning to our growth strategy. Last month, we completed our latest strategic acquisition with the purchase of Four Star Paving, the premier commercial paving contractor in the Nashville Metro area.

I want to welcome all the great folks at Four Star Paving to the CPI family of companies. Their assets and customer relationships across Central Tennessee will serve as a valuable extension of our platform company in the state, PRI. Four Star represents our fourth acquisition in fiscal 2026 and our 17th since the beginning of fiscal 2024, underscoring the continued momentum of our disciplined M&A strategy. These acquisitions are all fully integrated and meaningfully contribute to the growth of our financial results. Today, the generational transition of family companies continues in our industry, and we have a robust pipeline of attractive acquisition opportunities across our existing footprint and adjacent states. We remain in active dialogue with a number of prospective sellers.

We also remain focused on organic growth as a strong driver of shareholder value. Our new Gastonia, North Carolina greenfield will begin operations this quarter and soon will be servicing a large $60 million contract expanding and widening 85 through Gaston County near Charlotte. As a key part of our organic growth, there are several more greenfield facilities that we plan to bring online later this year and early next year. Before turning the call over to Greg, I want to reiterate that our family of companies is now in our busy work season, executing on a record backlog and continuing to deliver excellence to our customers in both the public and private markets. As reflected in our revised guidance, we expect fiscal year 2026 to be another strong year, reinforcing our confidence in achieving our ROAD 2030 growth plan to double the size of the company generate $1 billion of annual EBITDA and expand EBITDA margins to approximately 17%.

And with that, I’d like to now turn the call over to Greg. Greg?

Gregory Hoffman: Thanks, Jule, and good morning, everyone. As Jule mentioned, we reported a strong second quarter, maintaining the outperformance we experienced in Q1 to start the year. I will review the quarter in more detail before discussing our raised outlook ranges. I’ll start with a review of our key performance metrics for the second quarter of fiscal 2026. Revenue was $769.2 million, an increase of 35% compared to last year. The breakdown of this revenue growth was 11% organic and 24% acquisitive. For the fiscal 2026 year, we continue to anticipate organic growth of approximately 7% to 8%. Gross profit in the second quarter was $98.9 million, an increase of approximately 39% compared to last year. As a percentage of total revenues, gross profit was 12.9% compared to 12.5% last year.

General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue in the second quarter were 8.3% in FY ’26 and 8.2% in FY ’25. Net income was $9.2 million and adjusted net income was $10.4 million. Earnings per diluted share for adjusted net income was $0.18. Adjusted EBITDA was $93.3 million, an increase of 35% compared to last year. Adjusted EBITDA margin for the quarter was 12.1%. You can find GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations of net income and adjusted EBITDA financial measures at the end of today’s earnings release. Turning now to the balance sheet. We had $77 million of cash and cash equivalents and $150 million available under our credit facility at March 31, net of a reduction for outstanding letters of credit. As of the end of the quarter, our debt to trailing 12-month EBITDA ratio was 3.23x.

We remain on pace with our strategy of reducing the leverage ratio to approximately 2.5x to support sustained profitable growth. To that end, we anticipate cash flow generated during the third quarter to fund the Four Star Paving acquisition without the need for additional long-term debt. demonstrating the strength of cash flow from our operating model. In the second quarter of fiscal 2026, cash flow from operations was $65.2 million. up from $55.6 million in Q2 of fiscal 2025. We expect to convert 75% to 85% of EBITDA to cash flow from operations in FY ’26. These are our new ranges. Revenue in the range of $3.59 billion to $3.65 billion, net income in the range of $159 million to $162 million, adjusted net income in the range of $170.4 million to $174.2 million, adjusted EBITDA in the range of $552 million to $564 million and adjusted EBITDA margin in the range of 15.38% to 15.45%.

Lastly, as Jule mentioned, we had a project backlog of $3.14 billion at March 31, 2026. We have approximately 80% to 85% of the next 12 months contract revenue covered in backlog. And with that, we will open the call to questions. Operator?

Q&A Session

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question will hear from Kathryn Thompson with Thompson Research Group. We are having some technical difficulties. Please, standby.

Rick Black: Sorry, everyone. We appear to have technical difficulties right now. Operator, can you provide an update on being able to put in our questioners?

Operator: Just one moment, please, while we try to reconnect. [Operator Instructions]

Operator: I can take the next available question we have from Kathryn Thompson of Thompson Research Group.

Kathryn Thompson: All right. Well, it’s the case of the Fridays. I wanted to follow up on — this has been a fairly active year with M&A. And as we think about modeling for the back half of the year, in light of companies you’ve acquired, how should we think about contribution from acquisitions, margin profile and any other factor we should think about when taking into account these acquisitions.

F. Smith: Yes. Kathryn, I’ll speak to just the M&A environment since you asked. And call on Ned, who works closely with us on just growth strategy. And then Greg can give you sort of the modeling question. But we’ve had a busy year with M&A. We continue to talk to a lot of folks in a number of states. I mean, we said that the three acquisition — platform acquisitions we did last year, would create opportunities in those states. And you saw that happen in Tennessee this past 30 days with Four Star Paving. So we’re busy. We’re talking to a lot of folks trying to make good decisions. I’m going to turn the call over to Ned and then Greg.

Ned Fleming: Thank you, Jule. I think, Kathryn, it’s really interesting, having been part of this now for 26 years. We continue to see an industry that’s in growth mode. I don’t think anybody goes anywhere where they say, “Wow, the roads are perfect.” And so the demand curve for that with the voters has increased over time. So you’ve got a large growing industry. The demographics are still moving toward the Sunbelt, which is really our focus and will continue to be our focus. We see more and more people moving there, more and more businesses moving there. if you were just to go chart even data centers, more and more data centers moving there, which creates opportunities for us. And you still have an industry that’s very fragmented where generational transition is happening and people every year, people are getting older.

And so we see more and more opportunities. It’s almost amazing. We see a lot of bolt-on opportunities because of the new states that we’ve entered. We’re seeing real benefits in Texas from doing the acquisitions in Houston, and that’s just a booming market, both from the standpoint of public services as well as private enterprise and commercial. And the last piece is we still — there’s no technological obsolescence. I mean there are ways for us to utilize, and we’re looking at that, utilizing technology and AI, and there’s some really terrific benefits for the company, and I think we’re way ahead of the curve on all of that. But AI is not going to lay asphalt or pave the road or greater road. So for us, I think we see an environment that’s almost better today than it was 25 years ago for growth.

And we see a lot of opportunities that we pass on. So I think as you look to the back half of this year, you’ll see us do some acquisitions that we think are strategic where it fits the culture where there are great long-term benefits as we move into those territories, both bolt-ons. We also see new platforms in new states. I don’t know that we’ll do any of those at this stage of the game, but we certainly see them. So growth is — good at this stage of gaming continues to be a bright future.

Gregory Hoffman: Yes, Kathryn. As far as your modeling questions, so the remaining 6 months, we’ll have about $225 million, $235 million of acquisitive revenue. If you do the math there on the center of our guide, that puts us about right in the heart of that 7% to 8% organic growth with our 11% in Q2. Organic growth, that kind of is a 7% to 8% organic guide all year.

Kathryn Thompson: Okay. That’s very helpful. And then you touched on in your prepared commentary, some various jobs in major markets, Texas, to Tennessee and along the East Coast. Are you seeing any change in the momentum either positive or negative with that reindustrialization trend? And maybe putting a finer point to it. If you look at the types of jobs that you have in your backlog today, how does it look today versus 2 years ago?

F. Smith: Yes, Kathryn. When we look at our backlog, as we’ve talked about from several years ago, we still have a good breakdown of public and commercial projects, but the commercial projects are much more weighted and favoring manufacturing and corporate centers and warehouses. And so the reindustrialization trend that started with COVID supply chains and that has sped up this past year to 18 months is affecting our opportunities. There’s no question. I think Q1, our country had record investment in capital infrastructure, and the Sunbelt states are getting a lot of that investment. The article just came out this week at NVIDIA and Corning are investing $2.7 billion in three facilities in North Carolina and Texas. And those are two of our key states, and we’re going to look to participate in that investment. So I would say, if you think the reindustrialization is going to be a tailwind for the next several years.

Operator: The next question is from Rohit Seth of B. Riley Securities.

Rohit Seth: This is just on the liquid AC and the diesel and the energy shock. Is there any sort of timing delay between when you incur those costs and when you get the rebates from the DOTs on the escalators as we think about going into the third quarter?

Gregory Hoffman: Yes, Rohit. No, actually not. They’re settled monthly in the progress payment that we get from the states. So literally, they’re taking from the time we bid the job, the date we bid the job, the index then and comparing that to the date we made it. And then in that month, that settlement is done in that month payment.

Rohit Seth: Okay. All right. And then just regards to the IIJA reauthorization and your ROAD 2030 target, when you contemplated that ROAD 2030, were you of the view that funding level is going to come out to the $500 billion to $600 billion that you mentioned on the prepared remarks?

F. Smith: Yes, Rohit, that’s a good question. And I would say the answer to that is no. We anticipate that each year, the investment in infrastructure at the federal level will go up because it always has. And so — but we don’t assume some 20% to 30% to 40% increase that could be part of this reauthorization that we’re hearing in the $500 billion to $600 billion range. That’s not something that we model in. It would be nice. I think it would be good for our country. But no, we just assume a normal mid-single-digit bump each year, which is what’s happened for the last 3 decades.

Rohit Seth: Okay, fantastic. And then on the data centers, you mentioned several data centers. Is that becoming a more sizable portion of your book? Like is there a way to frame the size of the impacts relative to the size of the business at the moment?

F. Smith: Yes. I would say, Rohit, that it is becoming more of a part of what we do because there’s more being built in our markets. And as we get involved with the people building data centers, we build relationships and so that’s allowing us to have more opportunity to participate up front and helping them plan their projects and participate in them as they’re built. So we see data centers as a really good opportunity across a number of our states for — I mean, you know the investment they’re talking about for the next 5 years. So these are really nice opportunities for us.

Operator: The next question is from Michael Feniger of Bank of America. I do apologize. It looks like Michael — we just lost his connection. So we’ll just go to the next questioner for now, Andrew Wittmann of Baird.

Andrew J. Wittmann: I guess I just wanted to dig in a little bit more on crude here. Maybe, Greg, first, can you — can you talk about what the kind of crude energy at liquid asphalt assumptions are in this revised guidance? Obviously, the margin percentage range didn’t really change very much, but I still wanted to understand how you’re thinking about that? And maybe just to kind of put a stake in the ground, can you talk about quantify maybe the impact year-over-year that those prices did have in the 1 month of the quarter that was affected?

Gregory Hoffman: Yes. Sure. So we’re using diesel and natural gas to run our equipment in our plants. Liquid AC just for the audience goes into making hot mix asphalt. Our guide really certainly is cautious, and we’re concerned about the future, like everybody is. But we don’t think that it really is going to make a huge difference for us because I think liquid AC and what we have at our terminals is driving a little bit of the offset and maybe what we’re seeing in diesel. And then natural gas has been steady. So no increases there that we’re having to deal with. It really didn’t have much impact, as Jule said in his remarks in the first quarter.

Andrew J. Wittmann: But my understanding I mean, presumably use first in, first down accounting on your liquid AC in your terminals. Can you maybe just remind us how many months of production you have there, recognizing that I think you said that you supply about 50% of your own liquid AC. So some of that — are you bought under contract for the other 50%? Or — and I know you got pass-through for 80% with the customers. But just trying to understand how the FIFO accounting is a factor, if at all.

Gregory Hoffman: Yes. It is, certainly. I mean, if you were following liquids in the quarter, it actually was going down for the first couple of months. In fact, our average pricing in the terminals was less than it was at $9.30 per ton and less than it was this time last year per ton. So kind of what I meant about what I said earlier is that as liquid — as prices go up, but we have in that terminal, each of those terminals, the value increases. So that’s powerful for us. But in terms of — we have 2, 2.5 months this time of year of availability for liquidity.

Andrew J. Wittmann: Okay. And then just maybe a final one. I just wanted to, Jule, get a little bit more sense here as we’re getting into the real busy season here. And just maybe you could talk about your April awards. The backlog, I think, sequentially, you had a lot of burn, but kind of sequentially kind of flattish organically. So just as we evolve into the real busy season, just thought I’d have your comments a little bit about what you’ve seen in April so far, getting a sense there. And I know you always say that your outlook for backlog is lumpy. Obviously, your quarterly performance since the IPO has been almost entirely up and to the right every quarter. But I just want to kind of get your sense on how the quarter and the year are evolving if your expectation would continue to be for a book-to-bill from here on out for the year over 1.

F. Smith: Yes, Andy, I mean, as I’ve said many times, and it continues to be true, we’re pleased with the amount of opportunities we have to bid. On the private side in our markets, we’re still seeing a good amount of opportunities. And on the public side, our state and local DOT contract awards are going to be up this year. Somewhere between 10% and 15% overall. So we’re bidding a lot of opportunities. But with the size backlog we have, we can bid patiently, and which we’re doing. So I feel like backlog is going to continue to build. Having said that, as we’ve said now for 20 quarters, historically, backlog has gone down sequentially in our busy work season. But for the last 20 quarters, it’s gone up. But it would not surprise us or bother us if in our busy work season, it went down sequentially. That would be just fine. So we hope we have the weather and the opportunity to burn off a lot of backlog in these next 2 quarters, and we’re going to continue to build it.

Operator: The next question is from Michael Feniger of Bank of America.

Michael Feniger: I guess the first question, just with these data centers, obviously, with these mega projects, big projects. Is this changing your overall average project? Does your risk profile, Jules, change at all as maybe you do more private work for these big projects? I’m just kind of putting that in context as we’ve kind of always known you guys as kind of doing a lot of these smaller scale projects. I’m just kind of curious if the risk profile is evolving with these larger projects.

F. Smith: Yes, Michael, that’s a fair question because, obviously, when I give projects to highlight, I don’t necessarily highlight the $2 million or $3 million county resurfacing, but that’s still the vast majority of what we do. I don’t think our risk profile has gone up. We always have and have had larger projects that we work on, on the commercial side and the public side. But no, our overall average project size really hasn’t changed at all other than inflation. So our strategy is still the same. We’re going to work on a lot of projects in the $2 million to $3 million range and that have less risk, higher margins. But we are going to continue to do these projects where we have an opportunity to work on data centers in our markets.

Michael Feniger: Perfect. And Greg, maybe on just the liquid asphalt question with the run-up in diesel. Can you just help us — some questions we’re getting from the audience is from the investor community is there’s been periods when you’ve seen a spike, and we would see it show up in the gross margin at some point in prior periods, we’ve seen a spike in oil and diesel. So I guess, Greg, how have things kind of changed in terms of how you guys have managed liquid asphalt? I think you guys now have terminals, you guys have more storage capabilities. Just help us understand how things have maybe changed versus the last time we’ve seen spikes in inflation, particularly when it comes to diesel and how we should think about it going forward for you guys now?

Gregory Hoffman: Yes. Good question. So yes, let me start by just saying we’ve said for a while, and I’m sure we’ll continue to say that when prices go up, there will be a slight headwind. When they go down, there will be a slight tailwind. So certainly not immune, but have evolved to your point, since the last spike, liquid AC certainly terminals and having that essentially inherent hedge in our vertical integration operation, but also a more mature hedging program of for liquid — I mean, I’m sorry, for diesel and natural gas. So all of those things help. We’re not managing to 100% trying to manage 100% of our risk away. We can’t do it. But we certainly try to manage some of that risk.

Michael Feniger: Helpful. And just — I guess I’ll sneak one more in, Jules. Just if we do wake up in a couple of months and it’s a CR, how do you — continuing resolution, how do you see DOTs in your state responding? Do they pivot in terms of some of their projects? Do you pivot and say, all right, let’s go after more private work? Or do you think it kind of continues to be status quo for a few more months until we hopefully get a actual bill? Just kind of curious how you’re thinking about it, how people on the ground are thinking about this as we head into that October time period.

F. Smith: Yes, Michael, working under a continuing resolution or CR is something that we’ve done several times in our industry. And it largely feels like business as usual. The states continue to work because they are still funding, and you just fund at the same levels. So if there was to be a continuing resolution this fall going into 2027, it would be at record levels because 2026 is a record investment in infrastructure. And probably the states would continue to do the maintenance jobs, the small- and medium-sized jobs. They may on mega jobs, say, let’s wait and see what happens. But for what we do, it’s very much business as usual. I’m going to call them — give it to Ned to.

Ned Fleming: It’s an interesting question. But if we look at it from a historical perspective, I believe 6 of the 8 years of the Obama administration was continuing resolutions, and we continue to grow this business at over 20% a year. So it’s going to be, as Jule said, business as usual. historically, we understand it. The states understand it. We don’t — hopefully, this time, we don’t anticipate it certainly being the length of time that the last — the Obama administration had.

Operator: The next question is from Adam Thalhimer of Thompson, Davis & Company.

Adam Thalhimer: Can you provide some additional details on Four Star. I’m curious how it fits in with the existing Tennessee assets and how many employees they have?

F. Smith: Yes. Adam, if I remember correctly, there are about 150 employees in Tennessee. And they — it’s a great fit. I’m glad you asked that question. So PRI, our platform company in Tennessee does a lot of public work. There’s a lot of payment preservation. And Four Star does a different type of work. We’ve known Four Star and those guys for years. They’re a great FOB customer for us in Nashville, but they are the premier commercial paving contractor in the Nashville Metro area. They work about a 70 to 80-mile radius around Nashville. And they just have deep relationships with the developers and general contractors and I mean you know how fast Nashville is growing. So these guys have just built a great reputation and business in that area. So we enjoyed getting to know these guys over the last few years and talking about what it might look like for them to join our family of companies, and we’re really excited about what they bring to the table.

Adam Thalhimer: Nice. Thanks for that. And then liquid asphalt, you said over 50% supplied internally. Do you have a goal to raise that up? Or is that the right percentage for the business long term?

F. Smith: Well, good question. I will, first of all, say, just as I said in my prepared remarks, liquid asphalt, over 80% of our use is indexed. I think people might not realize that, but over half of our private contracts, we have an index. And so we want to make sure and call that out. Liquid asphalt, over half of what we use now is internally sourced and we have — it’s our goal to grow it as part of our vertical integration strategy to enhance and grow our margin profile being able to source more of our liquid internally at the wholesale and pass it through at retail. That’s a big part of our strategy. So our goal is to increase that percentage over time.

Operator: There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back over to management for closing comments.

F. Smith: We want to thank everybody for joining us today, and we look forward to talking in the future.

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation. This concludes today’s event. You may disconnect your lines, and have a wonderful day.