Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) lawyers wrapped up their three-week e-book price-fixing trial against the U.S. Department of Justice Thursday, and now the decision in this civil matter is in the hands of Judge Denise Cote. And of the judge’s tone at the end of the trial is any indication, then Apple lawyers at least made a very strong case to beat the price-fixing charges that the DOJ levied against Apple and five e-book publishers.
While the five publishing houses all backed out of the trial by reaching settlements and voiding their agreements with Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL), Apple hung in and took the case all the way to trial, and the chances of Apple reaching a settlement now are about two – slim and none, and we see slim stepping out of the room. And why not, since Apple apparently had at least succeeded in changing Judge Cote’s perception of the proceedings?
Judge Cote, you may recall, made some headlines when she gave her perspective on the case against Apple as the trial started three weeks ago. She seemed pretty confident that based on what she had seen in discovery that the government had a very strong case that proved that Apple was the “ringleader” of the conspiracy to elevate e-book prices to undercut market-dominator Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN).
Let us refresh your memory of what Judge Cote said before the trial started: “I believe that the government will be able to show at trial direct evidence that Apple knowingly participated in and facilitated a conspiracy to raise prices of e-books, and that the circumstantial evidence in this case, including the terms of the agreements, will confirm that.”
Might this mean that Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) might actually beat the big, bad government?
While Judge Cote is expected to rule on the case within 60 says, the change in tone of Cote’s words at the end of the trial compared to before the evidence was presented in the trial, at the very least Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) made a convincing case that Judge Cote may not make her decision quickly. However, this also could signal room for Apple to appeal if Cote rules against it, based partly on her comments at the beginning of the trial, which seemed to indicate a bias and thus a perception disadvantage from which Apple had to claw back. Some legal experts think this case has the potential to reach the Supreme Court – to resolve a question of how price-fixing should be defined.
What are your thoughts about this? Do you think Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) can and will win this case? What might this mean for the Justice Department if it loses? Give us your legal opinions in the comments section below.
DISCLOSURE: None
