Adamas Trust, Inc. (NASDAQ:ADAMH) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Adamas Trust, Inc. (NASDAQ:ADAMH) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript October 30, 2025

Operator: “

Kristi Mussallem: “

Jason Serrano: “

Kristine Nario: “

Nicholas Mah: “

Bose George: ” Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division

Jason Weaver: ” JonesTrading Institutional Services, LLC, Research Division [“:p id=”A00″name=”Unknown Analyst” type=”A” />”

Operator: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Adamas Trust Third Quarter 2025 Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. This conference is being recorded on Thursday, October 30, 2025. I would now like to turn the call over to Kristi Mussallem, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Kristi Mussallem: Good morning, and welcome to the Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Call for Adamas Trust. A press release and supplemental financial presentation with Adamas Trust’s Third Quarter 2025 results was released yesterday. Both the press release and supplemental financial presentation are available on the company’s website at www.adamasreit.com. Additionally, we are hosting a live webcast of today’s call, which you can access in the Events and Presentations section of the company’s website. At this time, management would like me to inform you that certain statements made during the conference call, which are not historical, may be deemed forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Although Adamas Trust believes the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its expectations will be attained. Factors and risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations are detailed in yesterday’s press release and from time to time in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Now at this time, I would like to introduce Jason Serrano, Chief Executive Officer. Jason, please go ahead.

Jason Serrano: Good morning. Joining me today to describe our third quarter results are Nick Mah, President; and Kristine Nario, CFO. Christine will provide commentary on quarterly results, and Nick will follow with an update on the progress of our business plan. Before we begin, I want to thank you for being part of our first earnings call as Adamas Trust. our company rebranding reflects a broader strategic vision, moving beyond any geographic affiliation. The name Adamas, meaning firm, unbreakable and lasting, symbolizes a vision of strength and durability that guides our company’s future. We fully embrace this theme as the third quarter marked a strategically significant period for Adamas. EDA rose to $0.24 per share for the quarter compared with $0.22 in Q2, marking our sixth consecutive quarterly increase.

This consistent earnings growth supported a meaningful dividend increase to $0.23 per share, which highlights the strength of our capital rotation strategy into a period where the Fed restarted its easing cycle in September with a 25 basis points cut, its first rate reduction in 2025. As treasury yields declined in the quarter across the curve with a steepening bias as inflation moderated, — we took a more aggressive path to increase exposure to the agency sector. In fact, the third quarter included the highest level of quarterly net investment activity in the company’s history with an increase of $1.8 billion or 20%. The strong momentum led by disciplined and deliberate rotation of our capital from multifamily exposure into highly liquid Agency RMBS and other core residential credit strategies positioned our balance sheet for greater earnings durability and long-term shareholder value.

We ended the quarter with Agency RMBS representing 57% of total capital, nearly tripling our capital allocation from a year earlier. This rotation was designed to enhance liquidity and drive higher earnings for distribution, attractive market spreads. We are pleased with the high-quality portfolio we have aggregated over the past 2 years. As announced on our previous earnings call, we also strengthened our position within the housing investment ecosystem in the third quarter by acquiring the remaining 50% interest in Constructive loans, a leading business purpose loan platform. With housing affordability near historical lows and supply constraints persisting, we expect the national homeownership rate to remain pressured, gradually reverting from the mid-60s percent range today towards the level last seen 3 decades ago.

We view this dynamic as a long-term opportunity, creating a sustained tailwind for business purpose lending. Adamas is committed to realizing the constructive full potential and translating that growth into lasting value for our stockholders. We are encouraged by the strong results of the strategic pivot we made a couple of years ago to strengthen earnings stability, evident in the continued expansion of our Agency RMBS portfolio and the compelling growth trajectory of Constructive’s origination business. We continue to believe Adamas equity represents a compelling value opportunity shares trade a meaningful discount of 30% of adjusted book value. And considering the adjusted book value of just Adamas’ Agency RMBS position alone, our shares are still discounted by 17% to this holding.

We believe this clearly highlights the depth and durability of value embedded within our platform. After a historically active quarter for Adamas, the momentum generated to further advance EAD in the fourth quarter is obtainable given a full quarter of interest income that we can generate. We look forward to further demonstrating Adamas’ value with continued improvement to our recurring earnings. At this time, I’ll pass the call over to Christine to provide our third quarter financial highlights.

Kristine Nario: Thank you, Jason, and good morning, everyone. I’ll cover the key factors behind our third quarter financial results. Overall, the third quarter marked another period of strong earnings growth and balance sheet expansion. As Jason noted, we increased our investment portfolio to $10.4 billion from $8.6 billion last quarter. This growth, along with continued rotation into interest-earning assets drove the 9% sequential increase in EAD per share. Adjusted net interest income per share rose 7% quarter-over-quarter and 47% year-over-year to $0.47, reflecting our continued investment in agency securities, partially offset by higher corporate debt interest expense from the senior unsecured notes issuance in July. Our net interest spread remained stable at 150 basis points, reflecting the offsetting impact of lower financing costs and a decline in asset yields.

We improved our average financing cost by 15 basis points benefiting from lower base rates and more favorable securitization financing following the redemption of higher cost securitizations. Meanwhile, our yield on average interest-earning assets declined by 15 basis points, reflecting our continued emphasis on lower-yielding agency securities and BPL rental loans relative to shorter duration BPL bridge loans. During the quarter, we recorded $54.9 million in net unrealized gains, primarily driven by improved valuations in our Agency RMBS and residential loan portfolios. These gains were partially offset by $13 million of losses on derivative instruments, primarily interest rate swaps and $5.6 million of realized losses mainly related to conversions of residential loans into foreclosed properties that remain on our balance sheet as well as short payoffs on nonperforming BPL bridge loans.

Importantly, the realized losses on the residential loans were fully offset by the reversal of previously recognized unrealized losses on the same assets, resulting in minimal total P&L impact. As Jason discussed earlier, we completed the acquisition of the remaining 50% interest in Constructive, giving us full ownership of this leading business purpose loan originator. For the quarter, Constructive generated $14.1 million in mortgage banking income related to origination and sale activity and incurred $3.8 million in direct loan origination costs and $8 million in direct G&A expenses, resulting in a $2.3 million return. On a consolidated basis, the Constructive segment reported a net loss of $3.8 million, reflecting the transitional integration costs and allocations that we expect to decline over time.

As integration progresses and efficiencies are realized, we believe Constructive is positioned to become a meaningful driver of earnings growth. G&A expenses increased during the quarter from $23.3 million from $11.8 million, primarily due to the consolidation of Constructive and higher incentive compensation accrual. Portfolio operating expenses declined, reflecting lower servicing fees on our BPL bridge portfolio as balances continue to decline. We also incurred $7.9 million of nonrecurring costs related to the issuance of senior unsecured notes and 2 residential loan securitizations, which were fully expensed during the quarter due to our fair value election. GAAP and adjusted book value per share ended the quarter at $9.20 and $10.38, respectively, representing increases of 1% and 1.2% compared to June 30.

Our recourse leverage ratio increased to 5x and portfolio recourse leverage to 4.7x. — up from 3.8x and 3.6x, respectively, primarily reflecting financing activity to support Agency RMBS acquisitions, the consolidation of Constructive and the issuance of senior unsecured notes. Portfolio recourse leverage on our credit and other investments increased to 0.9x from 0.5x, driven by lower equity allocation. Overall, our strategic repositioning has strengthened our ability to generate consistent recurring income. With continued balance sheet growth and the integration of Constructive, we remain focused on delivering sustained earnings growth and stable returns for our stockholders. With that, I’ll turn it over to Nick for a market and strategy update.

Nicholas Mah: Thanks, Christine. This quarter, we achieved a record level of investment activity for the firm, surpassing the previous high reached in the first quarter. In total, we acquired $2.3 billion of residential investments, primarily concentrated in Agency RMBS and whole loans. Within our core strategies, we deployed $1.8 billion in Agency RMBS, $260 million in BPL Rental and $262 million in BPL Bridge. During the quarter, we had meaningful inflows of capital from multiple sources, which we channeled towards funding our elevated investment volume. Key sources of this capital include $115 million baby bond issuance in July, 2 securitizations executed at competitive advance rates and asset resolutions across both our core and noncore portfolios.

Following the quarter’s acquisitions, our overall investment portfolio has risen above $10 billion. Strong and sustained asset growth over the past few quarters have contributed to steadily increasing recurring earnings. This has culminated in a key milestone of raising our dividend. With a solid base of productive assets, our goal of continued portfolio expansion will power future earnings growth. Interest rate volatility has declined steadily since April, serving as a major tailwind for agency spreads. This was especially pronounced in the third quarter as current coupon agency spreads tightened by 20 basis points to 126 basis points. While agency spreads to treasuries have normalized over the quarter, agency spreads to swaps have tightened but still remain compelling by historical standards.

After a record quarter of agency purchases, our agency portfolio currently stands at $6.7 billion. Despite the increased pace of investments, agency leverage has declined from 8.6x to 7.8x. In terms of portfolio construction, we have continued to target 5 and 5.5 coupon spec pools with lower pay-ups. Given the mix of current purchases, the average coupon of our agency portfolio declined slightly from 5.59% to 5.51% in the quarter. Going forward, we plan to target production coupons to maintain a modest carry and lower duration profile. In the third quarter, we surpassed our 50% target capital allocation to agencies. Since the first quarter of 2023, we strategically built and scaled our Agency RMBS portfolio, capitalizing on attractive spread levels while achieving broad diversification from our credit assets.

Today, with spreads tighter and the portfolio more balanced between agencies and credit, we intend to take a more measured approach to agency allocation in the future. Our expectation is that while agency allocation will continue to grow in the near term, it will come at a more deliberate pace. Residential securitization markets were highly active in the third quarter with $57 billion worth of issuance. Strong investor appetite supported steady deal flow across the full spectrum of residential credit, tightening spreads and maintaining a well-functioning market throughout the quarter. Against this backdrop, Adamas successfully priced 2 securitizations. The first was a $370 million relevered securitization of reperforming and performing loans.

And the second was a $275 million securitization of BPL rental loans. We achieved attractive pricing and structure for both deals. During the quarter, AAA spreads in BPL rental and in broader non-QM securitizations tightened by 10 to 20 basis points to around 130 basis points, providing a favorable environment of continued deal issuance for the rest of the year. This securitization market supports our expanding whole loan activity and strengthens the strategic fit of constructive to our business. BPL rental has grown to our largest concentration of residential credit exposure at $1.16 billion, reflecting a 24% quarter-over-quarter growth. This remains our core strategy with the greatest growth potential as Adamas sources the majority of its BPL rental loans from constructive.

In aggregate, 98% of our BPL rental loans have prepayment penalties to help mitigate the negative convexity of the portfolio. We also prioritize acquiring loans with strong DSCR ratios, targeting property-related cash flow coverage as a buffer against credit deterioration. Our credit selection criteria remains restrictive on BPL rental loans with DSCRs less than 1, with only 1% of our BPL rental loan portfolio falling into that category. Overall, our BPL rental strategy continues to perform well with 60-plus days delinquencies hovering at 1.3%. We see the potential for this asset class to outperform across a range of economic outcomes. The BPL bridge market remains highly competitive. Robust securitization markets have enabled new market entrants and repeat issuers to access debt capital through revolving bond structures.

This increased capital availability, coupled with increasing investor demand has intensified competition for assets within the BPL bridge market. This has, in turn, applied pressure to both purchase volumes and available pass-through rates. Maintaining our credit selection standards, we have intentionally reduced acquisition volumes ahead of our revolving securitizations exiting their reinvestment periods in 2026. In the quarter, the BPL bridge portfolio declined by 4% to $919 million. As the BPL bridge portfolio shrinks, we are actively working to reduce delinquent loan exposure while maintaining disciplined credit standards to exclude outlier risk profiles on our go-forward purchases. We expect that near-term BPL bridge allocations will continue to decline, and we will deploy recycled capital to Agency RMBS or BPL rental.

We maintain flexibility to increase portfolio exposure if more favorable market conditions return. Within our multifamily segment, as Christine noted, we successfully completed the exit of our joint venture portfolio during the quarter. The full wind down of the JV equity book allows our multifamily team to focus exclusively on advancing the resolution of our mezzanine lending portfolio. Performance metrics remain strong with occupancy rates at 92% and only one asset in the portfolio that is nonperforming. The mezzanine portfolio generated a 32.4% payoff rate in the quarter, well above the historical average of 25.8%. We expect payoff activity to continue as the portfolio continues to season. Finally, we are pleased to announce the successful integration of Constructive into Adamas in the third quarter.

The constructive business has not missed a step. Origination volumes remained strong through the transition, reaching $439 million in the third quarter, 9% higher than the prior quarter. Originations over the last 12 months were heavily weighted towards BPL rental loans, comprising 94% of total production with BPL Bridge accounting for the remaining share. Given the strength of the securitization market, competition for loans are more pronounced. Our near-term objectives are to continue prioritizing origination quality by enhancing underwriting standards and streamlining origination processes while maintaining a diversified distribution network. In the quarter, Adamas purchased less than half of Constructive’s originations, demonstrating the continuation of Constructive’s broad market access.

We expect Constructive to play an increasingly important role in Adamas’ profitability and strategic positioning in 2026 and beyond. I will now turn the call back to the operator for Q&A.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Doug Harter with UBS. [“:p id=”A00″name=”Unknown Analyst” type=”A” /> It’s actually Melissa Lobo on for Doug today. I was hoping you could talk to us about how developments with the GSEs are impacting your thinking around capital allocation? And what are some of the regulatory factors that are impacting how you’re positioned in the BPL space…

Q&A Session

Jason Serrano: Yes. Thank you for the question. So I think overall, there’s been a lot of talk about GSE reform, what that could mean for the sector as a whole. I think every component of the mortgage sector, particularly in the non-QM space, has — would create a massive tailwind for opportunities. However, I think that we’re more balanced on what we think that opportunity would look like for the company, given that there’s a lot needs to happen for a full removal of the guarantee and what that would do to credit availability to the mortgage sector and borrowers across the United States. We know the administration’s goal is to reduce increase the housing affordability and reduce rates. And I think that will go in the opposite direction with a guarantee that has been removed.

So I think overall, we’re continuing to run our business without planning for that particular event to happen. However, we know if it does, there will be a tailwind, particularly in areas in the non-QM space. Constructive, we believe would be able to access many new channels in that situation. But again, that’s not something that we see as being a primary opportunity for us at the moment. Color on… [“:p id=”A00″name=”Unknown Analyst” type=”A” /> And just if you could expand on the decision to buy the rest of the originate constructive and what that means for ongoing capital allocation. I think you mentioned a 50% target, right, to agency still. How does that — how should we think about that going forward?

Jason Serrano: Yes. So the opportunity for us was we first initially took the first 50% was to really understand the business. It was a slow approach to full acquisition, but we wanted to look at how the market was developing, and this was multiple years ago on the opportunity. So the advancement of the full acquisition of the company was a result of seeing some long-term tailwinds that would help constructive growth, particularly in homeownership rates and affordability, et cetera. The other side was to — we really want to step in a position to control the outcomes of origination and product development. And so taking 100% of the business was a function of controlling some of the underwriting aspects as well as distribution.

So in that end, we thought it would be necessary to take that. And also we saw a great opportunity in origination volume to increase, particularly with capitalizing the company through Adamas. So we think it’s an excellent opportunity. We think there’s lots of new development and products that could be offered through the company. We think we have an excellent management team, an experienced management team that’s been looking at non-QM and BPL opportunities for over a decade. So we’re excited to take the next step with Constructive. [“:p id=”A00″name=”Unknown Analyst” type=”A” /> Great. And if you could just provide an update for us on how book value is faring quarter-to-date?

Jason Serrano: Sure. As of October 28, we see adjusted book value up somewhere between 2.5% to 3%.

Operator: Our next question comes from Bose George with KBW.

Bose George: Actually, just one follow-up on the book value question. Is the increase coming from both sides this quarter, the agencies and credit or more on one versus the other?

Jason Serrano: It’s coming from both sides. We have seen thus far as of October 28, that rates have come down generally. Spreads have — on the agency side have come in. On the non-agency or whole loan side has come in, but not as much. But overall, positive trends on both sides.

Bose George: Okay. Great. And then in terms of leverage, your leverage on the credit side remains low, but it went up to 0.9 from 0.5. What’s an appropriate level of leverage for that piece? And then on the agency side, is the leverage kind of where the run rate there is kind of where it is this quarter?

Jason Serrano: Yes. So the way we think about leverage is balancing it with the opportunity that we have. And as we mentioned, accessing the securitization market to us is important. So the leverage will ebb and flow based on the accessibility and our ramp with respect to our DSCR channels. And so you would see it bounce around a little bit due to the timing of those securitizations. We think below 1x is actually quite low for just a credit REIT in general. And we’ve looked to utilize securitization markets as a primary source of financing for our credit book over the long term. And you should expect us to continue doing — utilizing that path. And so in that end, it’s a pretty efficient model for us to finance and generate ROE on our home loan position. And what was the second part of your question?

Bose George: On the agency side, the leverage should be expected to kind of remain roughly the same.

Jason Serrano: Yes. The leverage on the agency side, we’re looking to keep that around 8x. And so this is a comfortable level for us.

Operator: The next question comes from Jason Weaver with Jones Trading.

Jason Weaver: Given Nick’s comments that capital allocated to agencies is above target and will be more measured ahead, what are you thinking as possible avenues for deployment for the capital coming back from the mezz and bridge investments? And would share repurchase become a bigger part of the strategy given the discount?

Jason Serrano: Yes. So on the capital allocation side, we saw a tremendous opportunity in the quarter to advance our balance sheet with respect to the agency book. We were looking for certain events to happen for some spread tightening. We saw that there’s still a death of supply in the Agency RMBS market against pretty robust demand in the market for the asset. So ROE still remained above 15%, which is accretive for many avenues of capital. And therefore, we took part of that story in the quarter with historic purchases for the company. Going forward, with agency spreads now below — clearly below about 120 basis points, the opportunity is more balanced between what we see in the credit side and agency side. Again, we’re looking to maximize ROE based on availability of the opportunity.

We’re not wedded to a certain ratio of agency versus credit on our balance sheet. It’s very much opportunistic. To the extent that we see spreads continue to tighten in on the agency side, we will look to allocate more on the whole loan side of the equation. In particular, we’re excited about the advancement of constructive and seeing higher origination volumes there, and we think there’s avenues to increase it from here. So that’s going to be a focal point for us as well. On the share repurchase side, in the last 2 quarters, we did access that and did look to take advantage of where our shares trade in the market at a discount. But I would say we think of it as an incremental investment strategy is like another avenue to allocate capital. We are very conscious about the equity shrinkage caused by the repurchase and not being able to produce long-term returns on that capital that’s been used for repurchases.

So we balance that with the opportunity. Again, last 2 quarters, first quarter and second quarter, we took advantage of that. In this quarter, third quarter, with our historic purchases in the market, we thought that the balance went to the asset portfolio. So it’s something that’s considered, but we do look at the long-term impact of taking our capital and removing it with the share repurchase versus the asset opportunity.

Jason Weaver: Got it — and then just to clarify, the size of the — I think you said 32% paydown on the mezz and you expect that to remain elevated going forward. Is it a more muted pace? Or are we still looking at $25 or so million coming back every quarter?

Jason Serrano: I think that the historical average is a good barometer. I think we may trend slightly higher as the seasoning of the portfolio starts to take hold and also the continued conversations that our team has with the various borrowers. But I think from a long term, I don’t expect that the long-term average is going to be — in the future, once everything is resolved, it’s going to be too different. But for the next few quarters, it may be a little bit higher.

Operator: I’m showing no further questions at this time. I’d like to turn it back to Jason Serrano for closing remarks.

Jason Serrano: Yes. Thank you for joining us this morning. We look forward to discussing our fourth quarter results with you in February. Have a great day.

Operator: Thank you for your participation in today’s conference. This concludes the program. You may now disconnect.