Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Zillow Inc (Z), American International Group Inc (AIG): Valuation Still Matters… Especially Now

Page 1 of 2

The StressTest column appears every Thursday on Fool.com. Check back weekly and follow @TMFStressTest.

Over the past year, we’ve witnessed quite a run in the stock market. The S&P 500 (INDEXSP:.INX) is up 21%, the Dow is up nearly 18%, and some individual stocks have just gone bananas — witness Zillow Inc (NASDAQ:Z)‘s 133% run, for example.

Far be it from me to throw water on the party. And, in fairness, while I think some stocks have gotten too hot to handle, I don’t think we’ve reached a point where the entire market is out of control.
Zillow Inc (NASDAQ:Z)At the same time, I think now is as good a time as any for a reminder that valuation does matter. For some help with that reminder, I went digging in The Motley Fool archives. As luck would have it, Whitney Tilson — yes, the present-day money manager who modeled his fund after the investing principles of Warren Buffett — wrote an article back in 2000 titled “Valuation Matters.”
Here’s what Tilson had to say:
For a number of years now, we have been in a remarkable bull market where valuation hasn’t mattered. In fact, I believe that the more investors have focused on valuation in recent times, the worse their returns have been. But this hasn’t been true over longer periods historically, and I certainly don’t think it’s sustainable. While the laws of economic gravity may have been temporarily suspended, I do not believe that they have been fundamentally altered.
Don’t get me wrong — I’m a big believer in the ways that the Internet (and other technologies), improved access to capital, better management techniques, etc., have positively and permanently affected the economy. Nor am I the type of value investor who thinks that anything trading above 20x trailing earnings is overvalued. I simply believe in the universal, fundamental truth that the value of a company (and therefore a fractional ownership stake in that company, which is, of course, a share of its stock) is worth no more and no less than the future cash that can be taken out of the business, discounted back to the present.
We’re in a very different environment today than the one that Tilson was writing about. With the financial crisis firmly fixed in many investors’ brains, a big question for many has simply been, “Should I own stocks at all?” Now, looking at the booming market of the past year, it seems reasonable to conclude that the fear is abating. And, unfortunately, the way it tends to work in the stock market is that the fear slowly morphs into greed, and the question of whether stocks should be owned at all changes to the hyperventilating conclusion that not only must stocks be owned, but they must be owned no matter the price.

Thus, the importance of Tilson’s message.

When done right, the how’s of the valuation question aren’t — as Tilson noted — simple, single-number pass/fail calculations. With that in mind, here’s how he said he thought about valuation in practice:

The beauty of valuation — and investing in general — is that, to use Buffett’s famous analogy, there are no called strikes. You can sit and wait until you’re as certain as you can be that you’ve not only discovered a high-quality business, but also that it is significantly undervalued. Such opportunities are rare these days, so a great deal of patience is required. To discipline myself, I use what I call the “Pinch-Me-I-Must-Be-Dreaming Test.” This means that before I’ll invest, I have to be saying to myself, “I can’t believe my incredible good fortune that the market has so misunderstood this company and mispriced its stock that I can buy it at today’s low price.”

Do these kinds of valuations exist today? I believe they do. American International Group Inc (NYSE:AIG) has made an impressive amount of progress in repairing its business, and at a book-value multiple of 0.74, I don’t think the market is giving the company nearly the credit it deserves. Likewise with JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM). Its performance has set it apart as one of the premiere big banks in the world, but regulatory and backward-looking London Whale concerns have kept the valuation at an attractive level.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...