Why Stephen Taub is Dead Wrong About Following Hedge Funds’ 13F Filings

Page 1 of 2

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAYHere at Insider Monkey, we’re big believers of imitating the smart money. Over at Institutional Investor’s Alpha, Stephen Taub penned an article titled “Beware the Temptation to Follow Hedge Funds’ 13F Filings.” We’re going to show you why he’s dead wrong.

You can beat the market following hedge funds’ 13F filings, and we’ll show you how.

In the article, Taub breaks his argument into three parts; we will deconstruct each.

Taub’s First Argument: Hedge funds’ most popular stocks performed terribly since September. This means that it’s not always a good idea to mimic their top picks.

In his analysis, Taub mentions that “the hedge fund set is not always so brilliant,” adding that “three of the four most widely held stocks lost money from October through December.” These are Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) (-20.2%), Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) (-6.3%), and Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) (-10.3%).

He’s wrong because: You can always find a time period where any investment strategy underperforms.

It’s no secret that some of tech’s biggest names have been struggling over the past few months; you’d have to be living under a rock to miss daily news of Apple’s fall from above the $700 mark. But let’s be clear: any investor owning this trio of stocks for the entirety of 2012 would have come out in the green. Apple returned over 30%, Google was up 9.5%, and Microsoft gained 2.9%.

Our main point, though, is that in order to test any investment strategy, an actual empirical analysis must be done, and the time period must be much larger than simply three months. We did one, and the results speak for themselves.

We have 10 years of 13F data for 92% of all hedge funds between 1999 and 2009. The 30 most popular picks among hedge funds generated a positive alpha of 10 basis points per month (see the details here). This means that on a risk-adjusted basis, hedge funds’ most popular stock picks outperformed the market by around 1 percentage point per year over the 10 years we analyzed.

Taub’s Second Argument: There is a 45-day delay in reporting, and hedge funds’ portfolios might change significantly. He assumes that you cannot beat the market because of this delay. He also assumes that you cannot replicate hedge funds because of this delay.

He’s wrong because: This delay actually helps investors’ ability to beat the market by imitating hedge funds.

Once again, there’s no shred of empirical evidence behind Taub’s argument. He makes the assumption that hedge funds are great at timing the market, and if you imitate their 13F holdings with a 45-day delay, you’ll get burned.

This isn’t true.

In fact, hedge fund managers can’t always perfectly time the market. If they’re early into an investment, then imitating them after a 45-day delay might yield even better results. We can prove that this is the case.

In our original analysis, we also used a 2-month delay in our backtest of hedge funds’ 30 most popular picks. We found that between 1999 and 2009, these most popular stocks generated a monthly alpha of 19 basis points (more than 2 percentage points per year). Our results got even better.

Above, when we imitated hedge funds with no delay, we generated an alpha of 10 basis points per month; in practice this isn’t possible. With a 2-month delay, we improved our performance over hedge funds by 1 percentage point. We beat hedge funds by 1 percentage point per year, and the market by 2 percentage points.

So, both of Stephen Taub’s assumptions are wrong. It is a good thing for monkeys to have to wait 45 days to see hedge funds’ portfolios.

What’s the lesson here folks?

Page 1 of 2
Comments
Insider Monkey Small Cap Strategy
Insider Monkey Small Cap Strategy

Insider Monkey beat the market by 52 percentage points in 24 months. Our beta is only 1.2 (don't click this link if beating the market isn't important to you).

Lists

The Best B-Boy Movies

Most Awesome Hip Hop Documentaries

Foods That Stain Your Teeth

Richest Doctors in the World

The Best Movie Sountracks Ever

The Highest Grossing Musicals on Broadway

The Most Successful Reality TV Stars

Cheapest Cities to Visit in the US

Most Expensive Summer Camps

Most Expensive Animals in the World

Most Expensive Specialty Crops in the World

Movies That Took Ages to Make

The Longest Hollywood Films Ever Made

Most Expensive Concert Stages

The Richest Bands of all Time

10 Most Corrupt Countries 2013 List

10 Countries with the Highest Quality of Life Index

Most Expensive Mattresses in the World

5 Smallest Countries by Land Area

The Ultimate Heartbreak Songs

Richest Teenagers in the World

10 Most Haunted Places in America

10 Best Places to Retire in Florida East Coast

Top 10 Places to See Before You Die

Top 8 Countries in the World Where Justice Prevails

10 Richest States in America

15 Wealthiest Countries in the World

Richest Singers in the World

Most Expensive Tasting Menu in New York City

Most Expensive Baby Items in the World

Most Expensive Hotel Suites in Vegas

Most Expensive Brunch in New York City

Most Expensive Beef Cuts in the World

25 Best Colleges to Get a Job

Top 10 US Supermarkets

The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the World to Visit

Most Expensive Xbox Games

Top 11 Cities Where Billionaires Live

Top 10 Most Charitable Companies in America

Most Expensive Seafood in the World

The 10 Wildest Conspiracy Theories

The 10 Best Job Markets in the US

Top 10 Accounting Scandals of All Time

The 25 Biggest Cities in the World

Top 10 Best Paying Virtual Jobs

Most Expensive Leather Shoes in the World

Top 6 Things to Buy in March

The 10 Most Stressful Jobs in America – 2014 List

Top 10 Jobs for Introverted People

Top 10 Honeymoon Destinations in the World

Subscribe

Enter your email:

Delivered by FeedBurner

X

Thanks! An email with instructions is sent to !

Your email already exists in our database. Click here to go to your subscriptions

Insider Monkey returned 47.6% in its first year! Wondering How?

Download a complete edition of our newsletter for free!