Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Which Natural Gas ETF Is Right For You? UNG Vs. GASZ Vs. GAZ

Which Natural Gas ETF Is Right For You? UNG vs. GASZ vs. GAZAlthough natural gas is arguably one of the mostfrustrating commodities on the market, trading the fossil fuel has surged in popularity in recent years. Natural gas’s inherent volatility combined with its healthy trading volume has made it quite an enticing investment tool for those investors looking for potentially lucrative returns. Natural gas is also known for being “greener” than its other fossil fuel cousins, like coal and oil, since it is relatively cleaner and produces less greenhouse gas emissions. And thanks to the rapid development of the exchange-traded fund industry, investors now have several ways to gain access to one of the most popular commodities [for more natural gas news  and analysis subscribe to our free newsletter].

Below, we outline the three most popular natural gas ETFs and which one will fit your investment objectives.

United States Natural Gas Fund, LP (NYSEARCA:UNG)

Quick Stats (9/27/2012)

  • Total Assets: $1.1 billion
  • Average Daily Volume: 10.4 million
  • Expense Ratio: 0.60%
  • In Depth: UNG Analyst Report and ETFdb Realtime Rating

There is perhaps no natural gas ETF more popular than US Commodity Funds’ UNG. With just under $1.1 billion in total assets under managements, this ETF is by far the largest to invest in natural gas: UNG’s portfolio is more than 15X larger than the next biggest competitor. In addition to its sheer size, the fund’s appeal comes from being one of the most liquid ETFs available on the market, trading over 10 million shares a day on average. Since UNG is comprised of natural gas futures contracts, however, it frequently exhibits high levels of volatility, as the commodity is known to make major swings in as little time as an hour [see also The Rise and Demise of UNG].

UNG is Right for You if: You are an active trader seeking to either speculate on natural gas’s movements or quickly execute positions in the commodity.

Natural Gas Futures Contango (NYSEARCA:GASZ)

Quick Stats (9/27/2012)

  • Total Assets: $11.4 million
  • Average Daily Volume: 37,000
  • Expense Ratio: 0.85%
  • In Depth: GASZ Analyst Report and ETFdb Realtime Rating

GASZ, which made its debut in 2011, was one of the first “Contango” exchange-traded products to hit the markets, providing investors with yet another way to make a play on natural gas futures. The fund’s methodology to prevent the adverse affects of contango is quite simple: GASZ includes a short position in an index comprised of short-term futures contracts, while at the same time maintaining a long positing in longer-dated futures. This combination means that the fund will generally exhibit significantly lower volatility than other funds, and that it might also allow investors to actually benefit from contango. It is important to note, however, that GASZ is an exchange-traded note, which will expose its holders to the potential credit risk of the issuing institution.

GASZ is Right for You if: You are an investor seeking to gain exposure to natural gas futures, but want a methodology that can help avoid the adverse effects of contango.

iPath Dow Jones UBS Natural Gas Subindeex Total Return (NYSEARCA:GAZ)

Quick Stats (9/27/2012)

  • Total Assets: $46 million
  • Average Daily Volume: 76,000
  • Expense Ratio: 0.75%
  • In Depth: GAZ Analyst Report and ETFdb Realtime Rating

GAZ is another popular natural gas ETF, offering exposure to natural gas prices through the futures market. Similar to UNG, GAZ invests in near-dated futures contracts traded on the NYMEX, making the correlation between the two products nearly perfect. Unlike UNG however, GAZ is structured as an ETN, meaning that there will be lower tracking error, though investors will be exposed to the credit risk of the issuing institution. Despite the slight drawback, the fund has accumulated over $45 million in total assets since its inception in 2007. GAZ also maintains a relatively healthy trading volume with over 76,000 shares exchanging hands on an average trading day [see also Four Little Known Factors Driving The Price Of Natural Gas].

GAZ is Right for You if: You are an investor looking to achieve natural gas exposure, but prefer the exchange-traded note structure.

This article was originally written by Daniela Pylypczak, and posted on CommodityHQ.

Loading Comments...