Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Wells Fargo & Co (WFC), U.S. Bancorp (USB): Increased Regulation Harms Big Bank Bottom-Lines and You

Page 1 of 2

The government’s strict regulation of banks provides both a blessing and a curse. On the plus side, regulation helps prevent corrupt practices that undercut honest banks and take advantage of customers. On the other hand, such regulation dramatically increase banks’ expenses. Increased expenses harm banks through decreased profits, and more regulation harms customers when prices increase.

Here are two ways that regulation is shaking up the banking sector.

1. Loans for the little guy

Take for instance a recent college graduate drowning in student loans and living pay check to pay check. The student must pay rent but doesn’t get paid for another week. It’s a terrible bind. However, many banks offer a solution – deposit advance loans.

Deposit advance loans function as a line of credit tied to a direct deposit such as a paycheck. After a customer asks for an advance, the bank takes that amount plus a fee from the next direct deposit. The loans are easy to acquire since there is no application.

They are also appealing because the bank deposits the money immediately into the customer’s checking account. These helpful tools, to both the bank and consumers, may become a thing of the past as regulators push for restrictive rules. The government is considering eliminating deposit advance loans altogether.

Wells Fargo & Co (NYSE:WFC)The leading provider of these loans is Wells Fargo & Co (NYSE:WFC). Wells Fargo threatens to end this service if regulations become tighter. Even with this threat hanging in the air, Wells Fargo continues to fight regulation of these high-interest, short-term loans. Discontinuing the loans, for example, would force customers to turn to more expensive options like Payday loans, which can charge usurious interest rates of up to 500%.

Deposit advance loans provide a steady revenue stream from the average 120% interest customers pay. Without these loans, Wells Fargo & Co (NYSE:WFC)’s revenue from its customer credit and installment segment will surely suffer.

Among a handful of other deposit advance loan providers, U.S. Bancorp (NYSE:USB) also butts heads with regulators. It explained that the new regulations would make loans more expensive and intricate. Bancorp’s ability to provide these loans would be restricted due to the increased costs and complexity.

Though banks do not disclose how many of these loans they make or how profitable they are, we can still understand how U.S. Bancorp (NYSE:USB)will be harmed. It stands to lose customers who use these loans. This would eliminate the revenue stream from the interest payments. Additionally, many of these customers have other banking products such as checking accounts and mortgages. As these customers leave, U.S. Bancorp would lose revenue streams from the other products.

Despite the high interest rate, demand for these loans exists. This past May, customers and employees gathered in Los Angeles outside the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The demonstration represented their desire for the deposit advance loans’ continued existence.

2. Fighting off online thieves

Forget the ski masks, guns, and getaway car. All you need now to rob a bank is a computer and excellent IT / hacking skills. Banks face the threat of hackers from all walks of life: individual thieves, criminal gangs, and even foreign governments. These threats have led U.S. regulators to call for tightened bank security.

The regulators insist that banks must take personal responsibility for cyber-attack protection. Though the government plans war games to help banks practice to defend against cyber-attacks, the firms must pay for increased security on their own.

This past March, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) faced a hacking incident that shut down its online banking system preventing many customers from accessing their accounts. And just last fall, Iranian hackers compromised Citigroup Inc. (NYSE:C)‘ high security computer systems. These events were only a couple among a series of incidents faced by JPMorgan Chase, Citi, and Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC), since 2011.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...