Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (WMT), Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN), and How Corporate America Spends Its Cash

Page 1 of 2

In 2000, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE:WMT) generated $8.2 billion in cash from operations, $6.2 billion (75%) of which went into capital expenditures, like investing in new stores. A far smaller share — about $1 billion — was returned to shareholders in the form of dividends and share buybacks. Investing in the future far outweighed rewarding investors today .

In 2012, the tables flipped. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE:WMT) generated $25.6 billion in cash from operations and spent $12.9 billion — or 50% — on capital expenditures. Another $13 billion was distributed to shareholders in dividends and buybacks. Investing in the future and rewarding shareholders today took equal precedence.

Part of this shift is Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE:WMT) maturing from a growth company into a stalwart. But it’s actually indicative of how most of corporate America has changed over the last decade. Goldman Sachs recently published a report showing how S&P 500 have spent their cash on over the last 15 years. I’ve recreated it here:

Source: Goldman Sachs.

A few trends stick out:

Buybacks are up.

Dividends are up.

Capital expenditures are down.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE:WMT)Part of this is because of a weak economy. No business will invest in a new shoe factory if consumers don’t have enough income to buy more shoes. And given America’s demographic headaches, businesses would have fewer investment opportunities today compared with a decade ago even if the economy were strong.

Though it’s harder to prove, part of this is likely a shift toward short-term thinking among corporate executives. Henry Blodget of Business Insider wrote this weekend:

The way most companies do business is to focus primarily on today’s bottom line: The prevailing ethos in corporate America, after all, is that companies exist to make money for their owners — and the more and the sooner the better — so every decision should be made in the context of that.

The result of this is that many (most?) companies scrimp on things like long-term investments, customer service, product quality, and employee compensation, in the interest of delivering a few more pennies to this quarter’s bottom line.

Now, corporations may act this way for rational reasons. Most professional investors are judged by short-term performance. Rare is the fund manager who can truly reach for superior long-term investment results; investors give up on managers who suffer a down year, or even a bad quarter. They need companies to produce returns today, even if it comes at the expense of higher returns tomorrow.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...