Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

UnitedHealth Group Inc. (UNH), Aetna Inc. (AET), CIGNA Corporation (CI): The Coming Obamacare “Death Spiral”?

Page 1 of 2

Will the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare, begin a “death spiral” in 2014? The scary-sounding term “death spiral” is used to describe a scenario where individuals with higher health expenses flock to an insurance plan, resulting in more costly premiums that dissuade healthier individuals from enrolling. With fewer healthy enrollees to subsidize the medical costs of the less-healthy members, the cycle continues until few can afford the insurance.

A recent study says that Obamacare appears poised to experience this “death spiral” effect. How likely is this to actually happen? The answers depend on whom you ask.

Source: Wikimedia Commons

Spiraling away
The Obama administration hopes to enroll 7 million Americans in health insurance exchanges by the end of next March. Administration officials say for Obamacare to succeed, 2.7 million of these enrollees need to come from the relatively healthy demographic group of young adults between ages 18 and 30. Research conducted by David Hogberg, health policy analyst with the National Center for Public Policy Research, however, casts doubt on whether that many young Americans will actually sign up.

Hogberg found that around 4.3 million young adults ages 18 through 30 are likely to be eligible for plans on the Obamacare exchanges. 2.9 million of these individuals would be financially better off by at least $500 in 2014. Nearly 2.4 million would have $1,000 more in their pockets by forgoing health insurance. And that’s assuming the cheapest Obamacare plans with applicable federal subsidies included.

Another study by the Commonwealth Fund found that the most important reason young adults currently don’t buy health insurance is affordability. This survey also reported that only 27% of respondents between ages 19 and 27 were aware of Obamacare exchanges.

If the majority of those with financial incentives to remain uninsured don’t purchase health insurance (because they’re unaware of the option and/or the perceived economic impact is negative), Obamacare will fall well short of the 2.7 million young adults that the White House says are needed. Insurers participating in the exchanges would then almost certainly raise premiums for the following year — which could make buying health insurance even more unappealing for young adults despite higher penalties in 2015. The “death spiral” could easily kick into gear if this happens.

More spin than spiral
On the other hand, that Commonwealth Fund survey also said that the data suggest that young adults “will eventually enroll in large numbers” as they become more aware of Obamacare’s benefits. Most younger individuals do actually want to have health insurance coverage, according to the survey.

These results could mean that the future prognosis looks better for Obamacare even if too few young adults enroll in 2014. The “death spiral” scenario requires a progressively worsening state of affairs. However, if increased awareness and higher financial penalties in the years after 2014 significantly motivate young adults to buy insurance, the worst-case situation might not materialize — even if the negative predictions about enrollment of young Americans next year come true.

All of this might not matter, anyway, assuming that a 2012 study conducted by RAND is right. The study focused on the impact of eliminating the individual mandate altogether. According to RAND researchers, insurance premiums would only rise by 2.4% for most individuals even without the financial penalties for buying insurance, although significantly fewer people would gain coverage. Such a small increase, if correct, wouldn’t lead to the spiraling deterioration expected by some.

Wait and see
Which view is correct? Some big players are taking a wait-and-see stance.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...