The Insider Trading Anomaly: Recent Academic Studies

Find the first part of this article here: Insider Trading Anomaly: Make 7 Percent More Than Index Funds

In 1986 University of Michigan professor Nejat Seyhun used a better methodology to measure abornormal returns. He incorporated the “size effect”. In his sample, insiders in small firms had predominantly more purchases than sales. Insider Monkey also observes the same pattern in our dataset: 60% of transactions are made by insiders in small firms, even though in dollar terms this corresponds to only 16% of all transactions. Seyhun found abnormal returns of 4.3% for the first 300 days for firms with more insider purchases than sales, and -2.2% in the same period for firms with more insider sales than purchases. He noted that employing intensive trading criteria yielded similar results.

Insider Trading 3

Studies conducted until around this time were based on random subsets of insider transactions . Remember, they didn’t have comprehensive databases or powerful computers like those that are available now. More recently, studies utilize the entire insider transactions dataset and remove any remaining doubts about the profitability of insider trading.

In 2001, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaigne’s Josef Lakonishok and Inmoo Lee corrected for size and B/M effects by using a different trading criterion. They too concluded that the difference between strong buy and strong sell portfolios, which excluded transactions of large shareholders, is 4.8% for the first year after the transactions. They didn’t find any abnormal returns for large shareholders. (See Insider Trading Returns Calculated by Josef Lakonishok and Inmoo Lee)

Two years later, Harvard University’s Leslie A. Jeng and Richard Zeckhauser and Yale University’s Andrew Metrick calculated insiders’ actual returns for their purchases and sales. They didn’t use any sort of screening criteria such as consensus or “intensive purchases” that are used by other researchers. They also started calculating returns as soon as an insider made a transaction, not when the transaction become public. They found that insider sales are not profitable but insider purchases are extremely so. In raw returns, insider purchases beat the market returns by 11.2% per year.

And this return is not risk adjusted. By comparison, when a mutual fund announces they beat the market by more than 10%, they’re aren’t adjusting for risk either. The risk adjusted excess returns for the Harvard profs’ study are 52 basis points per month (or 6.4% annualized) using Carhart’s four factor model (Risk adjusted returns are 8.5% if you use CAPM to adjust for risk). Achieving 6.4% annualized returns without utilizing a consensus criteria is insane. And unbelievably, they found that purchases in small firms don’t earn significantly higher returns than do purchases in large firms.

It’s been empirically shown that insider trading has beaten the market indexes over the past 50 years. Academic studies have been publicizing this for 40 years. Yet, the markets aren’t efficient enough yet to eliminate these abnormal returns. Insider Monkey, your source for free insider trading data, believes that it’s still possible to beat market indexes and achieve abnormal returns in the long run by utilizing insider trading data.

Markets aren’t as efficient as you think.

Stay tuned: Profitability of Insider Trading in Netherlands

Related Articles:
Is Insider Trading Legal?
How Insiders Use Private Information and Don’t Get Caught?
SEC Regulation on Insider Trading: Section 10b

Comments
Insider Monkey Small Cap Strategy
Insider Monkey Small Cap Strategy

Insider Monkey beat the market by 52 percentage points in 24 months. Our beta is only 1.2 (don't click this link if beating the market isn't important to you).

Lists

The 10 Largest Pharmaceutical Companies In the World

The 10 Most Expensive Android Apps

The 9 Most Expensive Designer Bags in the World

The 7 Most Expensive Real Estate in the World

The 10 Most Expensive eBay Items Ever Sold

The 10 Most Expensive iPhone Apps

The 9 Most Expensive Designer Shoes in the World

The 10 Most Expensive Cigarette Brands

The 10 Most Expensive Law Schools in the US

The 10 Best Wall Street Movies

The 10 Most Expensive Golf Clubs Ever Sold

The 10 Most Expensive Golf Memberships

The 10 Best Disney Characters Ever Created

The 8 Best Foods for Gaining Weight

The 10 Most Expensive Colleges in the World

The 7 Most Memorable Ad Campaigns of All Time

The 7 Most Expensive High Schools in the World

The 10 Electric Vehicles with the Longest Range

The 10 Cities with the Worst Drivers in the World

The 10 Most Expensive Dresses Ever Created

10 Islands to Visit Before You Die

10 Famous Celebrities Who Needed Rehab

The 15 Countries with the Largest Oil Reserves

The 10 Most Overused Excuses in the World

The 5 Best iOS Apps You Can’t Get on Android

5 Companies Damaged By Social Media Blunders

The 10 Most Legendary Blues Songs

The 10 Most Lawless Places in the World

4 Reasons China is a Threat to the US

The 17 Most Sugary Drinks in the World

The 10 Most Ruthless Rulers in History

The 10 Greatest Generals in History

Top 8 Travel Destinations for 2015

The 10 Safest Dog Breeds for Children

The 10 Most Stolen Vehicles in the US

The 7 Most Expensive Celebrity Weddings

The 10 Best LoL Teams in the World

Top 10 Worst Marketing Campaigns Ever Produced

Top 5 Diets that Help You Lose Weight

The 10 Best Ways to Stay Awake

7 Artists That Switched Musical Genres

The 10 Most Expensive Cities to Live in New Jersey

The 10 Best High Schools in New York

The 10 Countries With the Least Gender Inequality

The 6 Biggest Musician-Manager Feuds

The 10 Countries with the Cheapest Gas Prices

The 7 Most Theatrical Bands of All Time

The 8 Worst Band Breakups of All Time

The 10 Most Important South American Leaders

The 7 Most Successful Casting Show Winners

Subscribe

Enter your email:

Delivered by FeedBurner

X

Thanks! An email with instructions is sent to !

Your email already exists in our database. Click here to go to your subscriptions

Insider Monkey returned 47.6% in its first year! Wondering How?

Download a complete edition of our newsletter for free!