Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Regulators to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)’s Management: Shape Up!

Following two day of losses, stocks opened higher this morning, with the S&P 500 (INDEXSP:.INX) and the narrower, price-weighted Dow Jones Industrial Average (INDEXDJX:.DJI) up 0.57% and 0.53%, respectively, as of 10:05 a.m. EDT. The Cypriot crisis remains unresolved, but without direct evidence to support it, the notion of contagion to other Southern European nations may be losing its poignancy with U.S. investors.

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)

Downgrading a Dimon
Dow component JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM)‘s main regulator, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or OCC, downgraded the bank’s management rating last July from “satisfactory” to “needs improvement.” This tidbit was reported last week when the full results of big banks’ capital plans were released, but The Wall Street Journal published a story yesterday that unearths some of the details concerning this confidential process.

The OCC scores banks according to a framework that goes by the acronym CAMELS, wherein each letter stands for one facet of the bank’s condition (“M” stands for management). In a move that was relayed to JPMorgan on July 27 last year, the OCC lowered its management rating from two to three (on a scale of one to five). According to the OCC, a score of three indicates that “the capabilities of management or the board of directors may be insufficient” and that management and board performance “need improvement.”

The downgrade was partially — but not wholly — the result of the “London Whale” fiasco, which cost the bank roughly $6 billion in trading losses and unquantifiable (but substantial) reputational damage.

What are the implications for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) shareholders? I continue to think JPMorgan’s management is first-rate — on par with that of Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs. However, the latter two are not hybrids in the way a universal bank like JPMorgan is. Combining a huge investment bank and a commercial bank adds a layer of complexity to what are, separately, phenomenally complex organizations. “Too big to manage” is a genuine problem for any management, no matter how skilled.

“Too big to manage” may also help explain why big finance firms are still trading at deep discounts to their historic norms. Investors everywhere are wondering if this is the new normal or if finance stocks are a screaming buy today. The answer depends on the company, so to help you figure out whether JPMorgan is a buy today, I invite you to read our premium research report on the company today. Click here now for instant access!

The article Regulators to JPMorgan’s Management: Shape Up! originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Alex Dumortier, CFA has no position in any stocks mentioned; you can follow him on LinkedIn. The Motley Fool owns shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE:JPM).

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Loading Comments...