Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Newmont Mining Corp (NEM), Barrick Gold Corporation (USA) (ABX): The Biggest Risk For Gold And Commodity Investors In 2013

Page 1 of 2

A few years after the global economy emerged from the economic crisis of 2008, commodity prices began to surge, thanks to ongoing robust demand from China. Chief financial officers at mining firms quickly realized that firm commodity prices implied robust future profit streams, and a broad range of new mining projects were put into motion.

To pay for those projects, billions of dollars were borrowed, and investors began to anticipate impressive cash flow returns from all of that borrowing. Just a few years later, that optimism has evaporated.

Slumping commodity prices have hurt potential returns from these expansion plans. Of greater concern, some mining firms are now carrying too much debt, and unless commodity prices rebound, they could be looking at a cash crisis in the next year or two. The Reuters/Jefferies CRB Index (INDX:CRB), which tracks a basket of commodity prices, has posted some mini-rallies in the context of a broader downtrend over the past few years.

How big of a debt hangover are we talking about? A basket of 55 leading miners held a collective $2 billion in debt 10 years ago, according to BMO Capital Markets. That figure has now risen above $20 billion.

Indeed, much of the debt has been accumulated in just the past few years as bonds were sold to embark on major new mining projects. Trouble is, once these projects get underway, they start to soak up huge amounts of capital spending, and often need to receive many more cash injections to see them to fruition.

Newmont Mining Corp (NYSE:NEM)For example, take Newmont Mining Corp (NYSE:NEM). In 2012, the company spent $3.2 billion on mine development, which was roughly twice the company’s 10-year average. To pay for that, total debt swelled from $4.3 billion to $6.3 billion. (And debt has risen yet further to $6.8 billion in the middle of 2013.) And just to finish up the mining development work that began a year or two ago, Newmont will be spending more than $2 billion this year as well.

Meanwhile, the recent plunge in gold and copper prices led Newmont Mining Corp (NYSE:NEM) to write off more than $2 billion from its stated asset value when quarterly results were released last week. If commodity prices slump further and stay down for several years, Newmont’s debt load may start to force the company to unload assets at fire-sale prices.

Selling off assets at a time of depressed commodity prices brings its own pain. To start to meet a massive 12- to 18-month funding gap, Barrick Gold Corporation (USA) (NYSE:ABX) recently sold its energy division for roughly $450 million. Barrick had been carrying that asset on its books for $900 million and now needs to take a big write-down. The move leads to concerns that as other mining firms look to sell assets, investors may sense that their current balance sheets represent a far too optimistic valuation of their asset base.

Many other firms focused on mining, commodities processing, and finished goods production (such as steel makers) need to make sure that there is enough cash on hand to meet the next few years’ worth of debt obligations. Here’s a quick look at firms that currently lack the cash to meet their debt obligations that will come due over the next two to three years.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...