Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) May Make More Money From Windows Phone Than Google Inc (GOOG) From Android

Page 1 of 2

We live in a world full of ironies. In this article, I will present you with one of these situations. While Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) boasts about dominance of its Android operating system and Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT)’s Windows Phone is still in its infancy, in about one year, we will see an interesting trend where Microsoft’s revenue from Windows Phone may be higher than Google’s revenue from Android. As unbelievable as it sounds, it is most likely true.

So what’s the deal here?

Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) offers its Android operating systems to manufacturers for free when they agree to use Google’s homegrown tools and applications with it. Google hopes to make money from Android phones through its search engine and related advertisements.

It is well-established that Samsung makes 95% of the money to be made in Android. Android enjoys a huge market share in the world’s smartphone market. The operating system’s global market share is estimated to be around 75%; whereas, Windows Phone’s market share is around 3% to 4% depending on which estimate one looks at. This is mostly due to Samsung’s ability to build and distribute a large variety of Android phones that come with different pricing, which targets consumers from different parts of the world with different income levels. Still Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) couldn’t monetize this opportunity.

Google leaves us in the dark

Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG)Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) doesn’t specify financials by its product. For example, we don’t know how much money YouTube makes and we don’t know how much money Android makes. I think Google should be more responsible to its shareholders and provide them with more information instead of leaving them in the dark. It’s funny how Google’s 2012 annual report only makes 13 references to Android (no mention of monetization). Android is supposed to be one of the products Google is most proud of and I’d like it to have mentioned it more.

There are some things we can track though. We know that Motorola reported a net loss of $1.1 billion in 2012 and another net loss of $613 million in the first half of 2013. Obviously the hardware business isn’t working so well for Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) but that’s another day’s discussion. Besides, Google claims that Motorola is still in the middle of transition and that it is likely to produce some great products in the near future.

The best estimate we have of how much Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) makes from Android stems from an ongoing lawsuit between Google and Oracle. According to the documents that surfaced last year, Oracle estimated that Google generates $10 million per day on Android, which would total $3.6 billion per year. There were about 350 million active Android phones around the world last year, which means Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) generates about $10 per Android phone per year. Given that the average user keeps his or her phone for two years, Google is expected to earn about $20 from each Android user for the life of a phone.

Interestingly enough, Google is reported to earn more from iOS phones than it does in Android phones. Because Android is an open-source operating system (which costs $0 for developers), it can be installed in things other than smartphones and tablets (for example, some GPS devices where advertisements can’t really be displayed).

Where is the money, Google?

When we combine Google Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG)’s Android income with Motorola’s negative income, the company is barely breaking even in this department. Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) doesn’t own a smartphone manufacturer, which helps with its margins. Last year, Microsoft paid Nokia Corporation (ADR) (NYSE:NOK) $1 billion in flat-fees, which is roughly equivalent to how much Google lost in Motorola. On the other hand, Nokia paid Microsoft a set-fee per phone, which offset most of that cost.

According to Nokia Corporation (ADR) (NYSE:NOK)’s latest earnings call, the company is slightly ahead when we compared the payments from Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) and payments to Microsoft. In the first six months of the year, Microsoft paid Nokia $500 million and Nokia Corporation (ADR) (NYSE:NOK) sold nearly 13 million Windows Phone devices. Since Nokia said it was slightly ahead, let’s assume that Nokia Corporation (ADR) (NYSE:NOK) paid Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) $450 million for software licensing. This comes down to $35 per device, which is about right (the licensing fee for Windows Phone 8 was rumored to be around $30 to $35 per device, but Microsoft never confirmed it officially.)

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...