Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) Isn’t Buying Barnes & Noble, Inc. (BKS)

Barron’s stirred up an interesting notion over the weekend.

Since Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) already shelled out $300 million for a 17.6% stake in Barnes & Noble, Inc.(NYSE:BKS)‘s  college bookstore and Nook business last year, and Barnes & Noble’s founder wants to take the company’s namesake book retailing business private, why doesn’t Mr. Softy just snap up the entire company?

“Ownership of B&N would jump-start Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT)’s retail strategy and give it control of 677 bookstores,” Barron’s argues, suggesting that Microsoft could pay $25 a share — or $1.75 billion — and gain control of the entire company.

Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT)The stock is naturally opening higher this morning on the speculation, but it just doesn’t seem realistic.

Sure, Microsoft has been known to overpay for acquisitions and strategic alliances. It’s silly that way. However, what would it really gain in Barnes & Noble?

Bricks and mortar
I hate to sound harsh, but Barnes & Noble, Inc.(NYSE:BKS) stores are growing more irrelevant with every passing year. Physical books are dying, and that will result in Barnes & Noble migrating to smaller stores in the future. Sales shrank 10% at the retail level for Barnes & Noble, and this is as it continues to benefit from the prior year’s shuttering of rival Borders.

Using the bookstores as a way to gain retail ground with Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) doesn’t make sense.

There’s no way that Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) could fill the cavernous Barnes & Noble stores, which also happen to be largely located in strip malls that lack the foot traffic of Apple’s smaller footprint in shopping malls. If Microsoft wanted that girth, it could’ve picked up Borders’ remnants for a pittance two years ago.

The last thing that Microsoft wants is an intimidating superstore concept. You can dream up a cool Xbox gaming lounge and areas devoted to different product categories that feast on Windows, but who is actually going to set foot inside a mammoth Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) Store?

The thinning ranks of leaf-turning bibliophiles may be regulars at Barnes & Noble, but there will be no need for folks to continue hitting up a Microsoft-centric retail outlet with books at a time when media is going digital.

Big Microsoft on campus
The division that held up the best in Barnes & Noble’s latest quarter is its 678-unit college bookstores business. It suffered a mere 2% slide in revenue, and the thinking here is that Mr. Softy can begin to gain influence with younger users here if it can cash in on both the campus stores and namesake locations.

“Microsoft could create a store-within-a-store with its Surface tablet, and other products in over 1,300 stores, including those at universities, where Apple is now a student favorite,” Barron’s argues.

That’s just crazy talk.

Does anyone really think that Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) taking the keys to hundreds of campus bookstores will find coeds dumping their iPhones and Android smartphones for a Windows-fueled Lumia? College bookstores will inevitably also go digital, but it won’t be on a Surface. Apple’s iPad remains the tablet of choice, and Android gadgetry continues to gain market share.

Students aren’t going to flock to a mobile operating system that will be more expensive than Android and less of a tastemaker than iOS. This is as silly as arguing that Hewlett-Packard Company (NYSE:HPQ) should buy up the company’s college bookstores.

“Hey, class, next semester we’re all going webOS!”

Nook on the line
Keep that HP image fresh in your mind, because Microsoft’s investment in Nook is starting to seem a lot like HP’s decision to buy Palm to get its hands on the then fading webOS.

Nook is already an insult to Microsoft. A year after Mr. Softy’s investment, the Nook tablet is still an Android-flavored device. Switching operating systems on a device that’s already fading in popularity — sales this past holiday quarter plunged a whopping 26% — would only hasten its mortality.

Microsoft made a bad bet last year, and it knows it. Throwing good money after bad would just be silly.

Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) has crushed Nook with its Kindle, and once we step up from stand-alone e-readers to tablet e-readers, the Kindle Fire, iPad, and a growing fleet of Android devices are the market leaders.

A couple of years ago, Microsoft could’ve cashed in on the initial Nook popularity, making it the default e-book solution for the eventual Windows 8 tablets. Now it’s too late. Nook is fading, and that’s rarely reversible.

Just ask HP. It’s still smarting after that $1 billion Palm buyout.

The ultimate deal breaker
If none of these reasons are convincing enough to explain why Microsoft would be nuts to consider swallowing Barnes & Noble whole, let’s imagine what it would do to the software giant’s stock price.

Microsoft isn’t afraid of cutting 10-figure checks. It did so in buying Skype, aQuantive, Yammer, and Fast Search. It has committed as much for alliances with search and smartphone companies that may be laggards but provide volume to amplify its reach in areas where it’s lacking.

Yes, Microsoft overpaid in nearly all of those cases, but at least the market understood the rationale. The tech bellwether was simply trying to make up for lost time by paying for skin in growing industries.

Barnes & Noble wouldn’t make sense to the market. It’s not about the $2 billion investment. Microsoft has that money to burn. It’s what it would communicate to investors — the desperation and resignation — that would send its stock lower.

This deal isn’t happening.

The article Microsoft Isn’t Buying Barnes & Noble originally appeared on Fool.com and is written by Rick Aristotle Munarriz.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Aristotle Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Amazon.com and Apple. The Motley Fool owns shares of Amazon.com, Apple, and Microsoft.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.