Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Metlife Inc (MET) Moves Closer to the Danger Zone

Pity poor Metlife Inc (NYSE:MET). Never has a life insurer shed more in an attempt to wind up with less. In MetLife’s case, its sale of its retail banking unit to GE Capital was an exercise in frustration, as one regulatory hurdle rose up to replace those already vanquished. At the end of last year, the sale was finally given the green light, effectively pulling Metlife Inc (NYSE:MET) out from under the banking regulators’ scrutiny.

The closing of that sale did not solve another pending problem, however. New procedures enacted by Dodd-Frank have empowered the Financial Stability Oversight Council to label any company as a “systemically important financial institution” if council members feel that the economy could be threatened by its failure. Earlier this week, the giant insurer announced that it had entered the last stage of the regulatory process that could give MetLife the SIFI designation that it feels it so richly does not deserve.

So far, not so good
Other companies — like GE Capital, as well as Metlife Inc (NYSE:MET) peers American International Group Inc (NYSE:AIG) and Prudential Financial Inc (NYSE:PRU) — have already earned that tag, which could push stricter new capital rules upon them. Though AIG and GE Capital are not challenging the classification, Prudential Financial Inc (NYSE:PRU) is appealing its recent designation.

MetLife’s CEO Steven Kandarian has balked at this classification in the past and released a comment along with the company’s announcement of the insurer’s status. He noted that no other entity can be considered threatened by its ties to Metlife Inc (NYSE:MET), and that unduly strict capital rules will extract costs from larger insurers only, thus impacting their ability to compete with their smaller, less regulated rivals.

So far, Kandarian’s pleas have fallen on deaf ears, and things aren’t looking great for Metlife Inc (NYSE:MET). After all, the CEO had lumped fellows American International Group Inc (NYSE:AIG) and Prudential Financial Inc (NYSE:PRU) into an argument against MetLife’s SIFI classification earlier this year at a summit in Washington, D.C., and look what happened to them. It also looks less likely that MetLife will escape the designation now, at the final stage of the regulatory process.

As Bloomberg notes, Metlife Inc (NYSE:MET) held over $840 billion in assets at the end of the first quarter, compared to Prudential’s $724 billion. Unfortunately for Mr. Kandarian, it looks like he is going to have to get used to MetLife’s new label very soon.

The article MetLife Moves Closer to the Danger Zone originally appeared on Fool.com and is written by Amanda Alix.

Fool contributor Amanda Alix has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends American International Group (NYSE:AIG). The Motley Fool owns shares of American International Group and General Electric (NYSE:GE) and has the following options: long January 2014 $25 calls on American International Group.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Loading Comments...