Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

International Business Machines Corp. (IBM), News Corp (NWS): Let’s Not Rely on This Outdated Metric

Page 1 of 2

We live in the Information Age, but do our economic indicators? Does GDP capture the outputs of every new technology, especially when so many new technologies seemingly charge nothing for their use? And how does paying attention to GDP over other measures affect economics, policy, and society?

A closer look is needed.

The Top 4 Tech Stocks to Own in 2013

Hidden value
GDP has long ignored many value-creating activities like parenting. Such a value, though, is likely to be relatively constant over centuries. But recently, as more value arises from computers, the Internet, and information proliferation, GDP may not be measuring a huge economic shift. Take a look at the make-up of GDP over the period in which the Internet and computer use became mainstream:

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis.

The percentage of GDP added by information, communications, and technology-producing industries has remained remarkably constant, hovering around 4%. This, while the number of Internet users increased from 36% of the population to nearly 80% — while our society transitioned from yearbooks to Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB), newspapers to iPads, and mail to Gmail. This is the “Clothesline Paradox,” explained well by Tim O’Reilly:

You put your clothes in the dryer, and the energy you use gets measured and counted. You hang your clothes on the clothesline, and it “disappears” from the economy. It struck me that there are a lot of things that we’re dealing with on the Internet that are subject to the Clothesline Paradox. Value is created, but it’s not measured and counted. It’s captured somewhere else in the economy.

O’Reilly argues that GDP is good at measuring value capture instead of value creation. As an example, take Japan. Since 1989 the country has averaged GDP growth of 1%, which earned the intervening era the nickname “the lost decades.” But even though GDP was slow to grow, life expectancy and trade increased — along with, arguably, the overall quality of life in the country. While Japan’s GDP demonstrates a slightly-better-than-stagnant economy, plenty of other measures paint a different picture.

Capturing versus creating
Those companies that have captured some of the value of the Information Age have performed spectacularly. Companies that have failed to transition are fighting to hold on to traditional revenue streams, and GDP might become distorted as a result. Look at News Corp. (NASDAQ:NWS), which recently threatened to pull its over-the-air broadcasts and move to cable because of a start-up, Aereo, that captures its broadcast with small antennas and streams the content wherever a user might be. News Corp. (NASDAQ:NWS) typically captures value through fees for rebroadcasting its content, but Aereo disrupts that revenue stream, and although News Corp. (NASDAQ:NWS) still creates the content, Aereo collects the value. The measured GDP value of those rebroadcasting fees disappears and may not be totally recaptured or built upon by Aereo, because Aereo gives away a limited version of its service for free.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...