Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Interest Rates Rattle Muni Bond Fund Investors

Municipal bond funds are typically held for their tax-free income properties and low risk profile rather than their growth prospects. These investments are beloved and often over-weighted in large taxable accounts for their ability to skirt IRS levies that traditional bond income generates. 

Yet despite this narrow investment thesis, it’s hard to ignore falling prices that quickly eat up a meager income stream and ultimately erode your total return. Such is the environment that municipal bond investors find themselves in as rising interest rates depress fund prices that peaked near the middle of 2016.

As an example, the iShares National Muni Bond ETF (MUB) is the largest diversified ETF in this field with over $7.7 billion in total assets. MUB is home to 3,200 individual municipal debt securities around the country that are primarily centered in California, New York, and Texas. This fund currently offers a 30-day SEC yield of just 1.38% and sports an effective duration of 6.21 years. It’s essentially a large, diversified, and transparent way to view the broad state of the municipal bond market.

As you can see on the chart below, MUB has declined 2% from its all-time peak and is in the process of testing its 200-day moving average. In just a manner of three months, this portfolio has managed to give back over a full years’ worth of income and is in jeopardy of breaking its long-term trend line.

mub

A 2% decline may not seem like much from a relative sense when viewed against the volatility in long-term Treasuries, high yield debt, or even stocks. However, this decline represents roughly half of one year’s average annual gain and may be a signal that this sector is due for a sharper correction.

Consider that during the taper tantrum of 2013, MUB fell nearly 9% from high to low as the 10-Year Treasury Note Yield ($TNX) rocketed higher.

mub_tnx

There has also been a high level of demand for riskier municipal bond portfolios in recent years as well. With low yields comes the uncomfortable stretch to lower credit quality or the allure of leveraged portfolios in the closed-end fund (CEF) space. Many of the large municipal CEFs such as Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Income Fund (NEA) and BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III (MYI) have seen a sharp drop in share prices.

nea

Both funds dropped 10% from high to low over a two-month time frame and have seen their discounts to net asset value widen in tandem. For the sake of perspective, their income streams currently range between 5.50% – 6.00%.

Much of this can be attributed to the uptick in interest rates combined with an already overbought sector of the bond market. Furthermore, there may be some overriding anxiety about the looming national election that has many investors on edge and ready to take profits when they can.

The Bottom Line

It’s easy to observe in hindsight that this area of the bond market was due for a breather, but much harder of course to forecast where it goes from here. New money may be eyeing these drops as a potentially buying opportunity, particularly in closed-end funds that are starting to display some value. The overriding factor for this sector is going to be driven by the direction of interest rates and investor appetite for risk.

My advice is if you do decide to make any changes to your municipal bond allocation that you should do so with incremental steps. This allows you to make calculated adjustments and potentially rebalanced into other fixed-income opportunities rather than just going to cash for the sake of short-term safety. Lowering your effective duration is an option as well to reduce your sensitivity to interest rates and still collect some minimal tax-free income.

Note: This article is written by David Fabian and was originally published on the FMD Capital Management blog. FMD Capital Management is a fee-only investment advisor which provides daily updates on ETFs, portfolio strategies, and market insights. Contact them for a free portfolio review.

Loading Comments...