For decades, the bookstore was more than just a bookstore. It was a place to escape, to read and buy books, have a cup of coffee, and chat in an intelligent manner with the owners and fellow patrons. It was a place where you could find a first edition as a gift or as a bookshelf enhancer, or get that legal manuscript you need to pass your bar exam. Lately though, bookstores have been disappearing thanks to the tablet, and the sticker shock some books come with, not to mention a certain coffeehouse chain taking the relaxation niche away. On the investment side, this has meant that the bookstore industry may be as old and dusty as that set of Encyclopedia Brittanica’s you have in the cellar, and for Barnes & Noble, Inc. (NYSE:BKS), that feeling of old age is catching up to them.
Yet, somehow, it may not be the lack of technology keeping the firm back. In fact, books may be what ultimately saves the company.
The company’s tech salvation isn’t happening
On July 9, Barnes & Noble, Inc. (NYSE:BKS)’s CEO William Lynch resigned, as the company looked for ways to alleviate the recent sales losses from its retail outlets and Nook line.
In a rather odd way, the Nook, despite being considered Barnes & Noble, Inc. (NYSE:BKS)’s way of staying competitive in an increasingly technological world, was actually the biggest source of losses for the company over the last year. Last quarter, Nook sales dropped 34% year-over-year, with EBITDA on the Nook falling $177 million, compared to only a $77 million drop a year before. By comparison, sales for the iPad were up 66%, and Samsung’s tablets rose by 282.6%.
Yet the retail portion of B&N’s sales, thought to be the more vulnerable aspect of the business, was only down 10%, with college bookstore sales up 10.7%, not bad when your demographic tends to be plugged into whatever the newest gadget is vs. the newest hit literary release. Yet these numbers stand in contrast to the expectations that the Nook would help Barnes & Noble, Inc. (NYSE:BKS) stay competitive. Why?
Tablet saturation means less Nook profit
It turns out that the Nook was more popular when it was just directly competing with Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN)’s Kindle. When the Kindle was still without a touchscreen until the Kindle Touch, and now the Fire, came out, the Nook already had it. In addition, buying a Nook provided access to the store’s ecosystem of books and other materials at a deep discount from the cover price. As a result, the Nook had some good years, and positive reviews.
However, competition from companies like Google, Microsoft, and Apple in the tablet market pushed the Kindle and the Nook aside, due to not being equipped for much beyond books and not having as built in a market as the three tech giants. Barnes & Noble, Inc. (NYSE:BKS) took it harder than Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN), as 66% of Amazon’s electronics revenue came from products other than the Kindle, while the Nook alone was supposed to be B&N’s link to the 21st century. When the Nook went down, the company did too.
How Barnes & Noble can be hip again
Yet Barnes & Noble has something Borders didn’t have: brand loyalty and good store environment. Borders was known for its warehouse inefficiency and lack of diversity in its products, whereas many B&N retailers are built like the kinds of places one could spend hours in, which means impulse buying. Since 1993, Starbucks has provided the chain with in-store cafes, adding the coffeehouse culture to the bookstore culture, and creating a solid revenue stream for Barnes & Noble, Inc. (NYSE:BKS). Also, being the main college bookseller, B&N has a captive audience of students who often need textbooks quicker than a site like Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) can provide (though not necessarily cheaper). Therefore, there is still a market for a place like B&N because going to a bookstore is still popular enough to be profitable.