Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Google, Inc. (GOOG), Oracle Corporation (ORCL) Ordered to Reveal Paid Reporters

In the aftermath of a hotly contested patent lawsuit between Google, Inc. (GOOG) and Oracle Corporation (NASDAQ:ORCL) over software used in Google’s Android smartphone operating system, a federal judge has ordered both sides to reveal the names and relationships of all bloggers, reporters and commentators who were paid by the companies. Both firms have until August 17 to comply with the order.

Google Inc (GOOG)

What makes this order noteworthy is that it comes several months after a jury found that Google, Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) had not infringed on patents and copyrights claimed by Oracle Corporation (NASDAQ:ORCL) when Google established its Android smartphone operating system using Oracle’s Java computer language. Oracle was seeking $1 billion, but the jury found in favor of Google and the judge, William Alsup, said that Oracle could not claim copyright protections on Java material that Google presented.

The order also seemed to put Internet and media law scholars on notice. Barry McDonald of Pepperdine University said that a First Amendment issue will likely be raised here, because this order revealing paid reporters may “improperly chill speech. (However,) I doubt a court would be very receptive to that claim if the speech at issue was essentially being bought by a party in some sort of misleading way.”

In the order, Judge Alsup wrote, “The court is concerned that the parties and/or counsel herein may have retained or paid print or Internet authors, journalists, commentators or bloggers who have and/or may publish comments on the issues in the case.” This “would be of use on appeal” and could “make clear whether any treatise, article, commentary or analysis on the issues posed by this case are possibly influenced by financial relationships to the parties or counsel.”

Oracle Corporation (NASDAQ:ORCL) has indicated it would appeal the original ruling.

In a statement, a spokeswoman from Oracle Corporation (NASDAQ:ORCL) said the company “always disclosed all of its financial relationships in this matter, and it is time for Google do to the same. We read this order to also include indirect payments to entities who, in turn, made comments on behalf of Google.”

Google, Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) has said it would comply fully with the order.

Could paid commentary in favor of one company or another have an effect on a trial like this? Could suppression of said reporters be a First Amendment question? What the motive for the order was may not be known until after August 17, when both parties will have submitted their lists of paid reporters.

Biotech Stock Alert - 20% Guaranteed Return in One Year

Hedge Funds and Insiders Are Piling Into

One of 2015's best hedge funds and two insiders snapped up shares of this medical device stock recently. We believe its transformative and disruptive device will storm the $3+ billion market and help it achieve 500%-1000% gains in 3 years.

Get your FREE REPORT and the details of our 20% return guarantee today.

Subscribe me to Insider Monkey's Free Daily Newsletter
This is a FREE report from Insider Monkey. Credit Card is NOT required.
Loading Comments...

Thanks! An email with instructions is sent to !

Your email already exists in our database. Click here to go to your subscriptions

Insider Monkey returned 102% in 3 years!! Wondering How?

Download a complete edition of our newsletter for free!