Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Does Apple Inc. (AAPL) Pay Enough To Uncle Sam?

Page 1 of 2

The Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations has questioned Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)‘s tax-avoiding schemes, claiming the company achieved “about $10 billion in tax avoidance per year.” Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) has defended itself, saying it is “likely the largest corporate tax payer in the US, having paid $6 billion in taxes” last year. Despite the differing opinions, both sides at least agreed in their written documents with one thing: “Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is an American success story.”

Apple Inc. (AAPL)Is this “American success story” paying its fair share? Or just doing the best it can for its shareholders? Let’s look at the intricate corporate structure to find out.

The Senate’s take
In the Subcommittee’s examination, a helpful chart outlines Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)’s global subsidiaries:

The memo notes that Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) Sales International has earned $38 billion from 2009 to 2011, yet only paid a total of $21 million in taxes, which means its tax rate was 0.06%. How can Apple achieve this?

The investigation focuses on Apple Operations International, AOI, an Irish corporation that has no tax residency, no physical presence, no employees, and three directors, two of which are in the U.S. The report states that “AOI’s net income made up 30% of Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)’s total worldwide net profits from 2009-2011, yet Apple also disclosed to the Subcommittee that AOI did not pay any corporate income tax to any national government during that period.” The magical, tax-free niche Apple found was in taking advantage of residency rules between the U.S. and Ireland. From the report:

Ireland uses a management and control test to determine tax residency, while the United States determines tax residency based upon the entity’s place of formation. Apple explained that, although AOI is incorporated in Ireland, it is not tax resident in Ireland, because AOI is neither managed nor controlled in Ireland. Apple also maintained that, because AOI was not incorporated in the United States, AOI is not a U.S. tax resident under U.S. tax law either.

There are many other schemes the report highlights, the most glaring being an enormous difference between what Apple accounts as its tax provision versus what it paid. For example, Apple’s effective tax rate based on its 2011 annual report listed a $8.2 billion tax provision for an effective tax rate of 24%. But, this included state and foreign taxes, and after taking those out, the federal tax provision amounted to $6.9 billion, for a tax rate of 20%. Apple, however, only paid $2.5 billion in taxes, according to IRS returns. This amounts to a tax rate of about 7%. The difference in reported and paid taxes comes about from claiming future tax liabilities if Apple repatriated its foreign earnings, and tax benefits from stock-based compensation.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...