Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

David Einhorn’s Financial Engineering Can’t Save Apple Inc. (AAPL) From This Big Risk

David Einhorn GREENLIGHT CAPITALDavid Einhorn has a message to Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL): unleash the cash.

It’s a noble goal from one of the world’s best investors. Einhorn’s influence could be enough to push current Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) CFO Peter Oppenheimer into surrendering at least some of the company’s $137 billion cash horde to its rightful owners.

But what it won’t do is save Apple from a bigger danger: wasting all its money.

Einhorn’s plan relies on financial engineering whereby Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) surrenders half of its current annual operating income to preferred shareholders each year. In exchange, the current common shareholder would receive Apple preferreds with a face value of $500.

The preferred issuance does two things: it drains some of the company’s future earnings while leaving it with all the cash it has today.

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) vs. Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT)

Technology companies are well known for making ridiculous acquisitions when cash piles mount. Let’s not forget Microsoft’s first ever quarterly loss in 2012 when it wrote down a $6.3 billion acquisition of a no-name ad company, aQuantive.

That certainly wasn’t Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT)‘s only bad acquisition. The Seattle-based company makes real money from only two products – Office and Windows – and wastes it on everything else.

Of course, Apple isn’t Microsoft. Apple doesn’t have a track record of wasting shareholder’s cash on acquisitions. But it has gotten more aggressive. The company tinkered with the idea of a so-called “strategic investment” in social media company Twitter just last year, undoubtedly at a multiple that would destroy tremendous shareholder value given just how cheap Apple shares trade to forward earnings.

Unlike a dividend recapitalization with borrowed money – one which would allow Apple to pay a dividend without paying taxes on its foreign cash – preferred stock issuance come with no covenants. Apple will still have complete and 100% control over the $137 billion in cash it keeps on the balance sheet. It can spend that money however it sees fit, even if that includes value-destroying acquisitions.

Bottom line

Investors should welcome Einhorn’s activism. Apple does have too much cash on the balance sheet. But investors need to be certain of his plan. It won’t restrict Apple from wasting shareholder money, nor will it necessarily create cash value for investors. Preferred stock won’t safeguard Apple shareholders’ wealth from financial mismanagement like a large one-time special dividend from a dividend recap.

Apple shareholders should push for an immediate return of cash, not a hodgepodge of financial engineering that doesn’t protect investors from spend happy managers.

The article David Einhorn’s Financial Engineering Can’t Save Apple From This Big Risk originally appeared on Fool.com and is written by Jordan Wathen.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Loading Comments...