Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Bank of America Corp (BAC) and Citigroup Inc (C): How Stable, Really?

Bank of America Corp.The debate over whether the nation’s largest banks are too big to fail rages on, as does the question of just how much in implicit subsidies these banks enjoy because of this notion. When it comes to Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC) and Citigroup Inc (NYSE:C), the two megabanks have been found to be much more dependent on TBTF-generated backstops than peers JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) and Wells Fargo & Co (NYSE:WFC), particularly when it comes to profits — which would dip into the negative zone for both B of A and Citi if funding subsidies were removed.

Indirect TBTF support aids debt ratings, too
Not surprisingly, tacit advantages exist when it comes to ratings on the biggest banks’ debt, as well. A new report by Bloomberg shows that, without such backup, the debt of Wells Fargo & Co (NYSE:WFC) and JPMorgan would be much less attractive for investors — and, for Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC) and Citigroup Inc (NYSE:C), pretty much its entire debt load would make even the pluckiest of investors run for the hills.

What constitutes this particular subsidy? Much as the belief that none of these huge banks will be allowed to fail gives them a funding advantage — since investors are willing to take lower yields in exchange for lower risk — a similar boost occurs when it comes to corporate debt. So certain are bank bondholders that the government will always be at the ready to step in if problems arise, that they are willing to accept lower bond yields.

According to World Bank economist Deniz Anginer, the author of a new study that highlights this particular phenomenon, this subsidy has infused an extra $82 billion into the coffers of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS), as well as Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC), Citigroup Inc (NYSE:C), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM), and Wells Fargo & Co (NYSE:WFC). That’s a lot of extra dough, and it’s notable that, without it, Moody’s estimates that essentially all of Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC)’s and Citigroup Inc (NYSE:C)’s holding company debt would sink below junk status. Things are less dire for Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS)’s and Goldman’s debt, but still pretty dicey; JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) would suffer, as would Wells, but they both would still have plenty of investment grade debt to float.

On the plus side, both Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC) and Citigroup Inc (NYSE:C) got some good news when The Wall Street Journal reported that the cost of insuring against a default at the two bank holding companies dropped this month to its lowest point since the financial crisis. But, as the Bloomberg articles shows, these two banks still have a long way to go.

The article Bank of America and Citigroup: How Stable, Really? originally appeared on Fool.com and is written by Amanda Alix.

Fool contributor Amanda Alix has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo. The Motley Fool owns shares of Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Loading Comments...