Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Apple Inc. (AAPL), Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.A): Do High Dividend Payers Perform Better?

Page 1 of 2

Lets examine the recent performance of dividend-paying companies relative to their non-dividend paying and dividend-cutting peers within the S&P 500 Index. I will take the S&P 500 index members and then divide those names into four groups to analyze the companies that pay and raise their dividends versus those that have cut or do not pay a regular dividend. Afterwards, I will choose my favorite among the four groups.

Group 1: Companies that don’t pay a regular dividend

The non-dividend payers lagged the dividend growers in total return by an average of less than 100 basis points, despite a yield advantage of 2.5% versus zero. The strength shown by the non-dividend paying companies indicates that the market is in “growth” mode, giving a lot of weight to future cash flows against present cash flows.

Berkshire Hathaway Inc.By far, my favorite pick among this group is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK.A). Warren Buffett’s candy-to-cargo train conglomerate is an outstanding cash-flow generator and the most amazing collection of US and international businesses. Warren’s explanation for not paying a cash dividend when the company produces +$20 billion of cash a year is that there still are good opportunities ahead and value to be created through investing those cash proceeds.

The best investor in history has been collecting great businesses with huge barriers to entry for five decades now. Warren has done a better use of the cash generated by his company than anyone else could have done. Not paying a dividend ended up creating value. That said, at some point Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK.A) will start paying dividends. But now, trading at 2013 19x P/E and growing sales at a 15% year-over-year (Y-o-Y) rate, I am sure Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK.A) is the best non-dividend payer you could find.

Group 2: Companies that recently initiated a dividend

Among this group you can find companies such as Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) , which first declared a dividend in March 2012, or older firms that may have discontinued their dividends at some point and then reinstated.

This is the best-performing segment among all four groups. This group led all others in both simple price returns (21.4%) as well as in total return (23.9%) despite having the lowest average yield among the three dividend-paying groups (currently 1.7%).

This implies that companies that recently initiated a dividend appear poised to outperform their peers if the return pattern over the past year continues into the future. As the markets are in “growth” mode rather than in “value” mode, investors are putting a lot of attention on future cash-flows.

My favorite pick among this segment is Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL). The company pays a 2.8% dividend yield, and is down by almost 30% since last year. Trading at an ex-cash 2013 price-to-earnings multiple of 6.7x, I think Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) looks deeply undervalued while it is generating more than $50 billion a year in operating cash flow.

Of course, the market does not think that cash flow is sustainable, otherwise, the price of the company would be significantly different. That said, I consider that the market is over-pricing the probability of Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) losing its market leadership and, hence, its cash-flow-generating capabilities. This is the main reason explaining why Apple is my favorite pick among the group. My bet is that Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) will keep generating cash and increasing its dividend.

Group 3: Companies paying a regular dividend that have for three years or longer but have zero or negative three-year
dividend growth rates

As one might imagine, this is the worst performing of the four groups over the past year. If I had to pick a company within this poor-performance segment, I would choose United States Steel Corporation (NYSE:X) . The steel company pays a 1.1% dividend yield and is down by 40% Y-o-Y; but the steel sector should start performing better as the US economy gains traction hand in hand with the housing sector. United States Steel Corporation (NYSE:X) trades at 2013 8.4x EV/EBITDA and I expect the company to start producing earnings again by next year.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...