Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Altria Group Inc (MO), Bank of America Corp (BAC), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM): Why Big Banks Support Regulations Against Big Banks

Altria Group IncThree years ago, the government passed a bill that clamped down on the tobacco industry, putting restrictions and outright bans on everything from advertising to flavored cigarettes.

The bill had one surprising supporter: cigarette giant Altria Group Inc (NYSE:MO). Altria Group Inc (NYSE:MO) was the only tobacco company to support the legislation, a fact it proudly states on its website.

Why would Altria support a bill designed to hurt its business? Perhaps because it already controlled 50% of the American tobacco market. By restricting advertising and growth opportunities for the entire industry, the bill made it nearly impossible for smaller rivals to gain on Altria Group Inc (NYSE:MO)’s territory.

I thought of this story while talking with Motley Fool banking analyst John Maxfield this week. He noted that too-big-to-fail banks might counterintuitively support regulations that attempt to end “too big to fail.”

Regulators really want to end “too big to fail,” but no one has the backbone to break up banks that are currently too big to fail. However, regulators will very likely prevent more medium-sized banks from merging and becoming too big to fail. Just like Altria Group Inc (NYSE:MO), big banks may support regulations that appear to hurt their business when they actually solidify their competitive advantage.

“If I could push a button and eliminate Dodd-Frank, would I do it? No, I would not,” said Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYSE:GS) CEO Lloyd Blankfein last year, referring to the financial reform bill designed to end “too big to fail.”

Earlier this year, Bank of America Corp (NYSE:BAC) CEO Brian Moynihan said the principles of Dodd-Frank “are all good.”

We’ve long known that being too big to fail produces competitive advantages, Studies show that such banks have a lower cost of capital; I’ve shown how this advantage could explain most of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM)‘s results. And with compensation often tied to size, bank CEOs love being big.

But those benefits aren’t open to any bank. The megamergers that enabled the current crop of banking giants won’t be repeated anytime soon. Competition for the too-big-to-fail crowd isn’t likely to grow. If you’re already there, you’re set. If not, too bad.

There are more than 6,000 banks in the United States. But the disparity of assets in just the top 80 is massive, with only a handful of banks being too big to fail:

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Not all names are listed to save space.

A lot of bank investors worry about the impact new regulations and will have on big banks. Maybe they’re right to worry. Or maybe what looks like the biggest threat is actually an overlooked advantage.

What do you think?

The article Why Big Banks Support Regulations Against Big Banks originally appeared on Fool.com and is written by Morgan Housel.

Fool contributor Morgan Housel own shares of Altria. The Motley Fool recommends Bank of America and Goldman Sachs and owns shares of Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Loading Comments...