Top 10 Suburbs for Retirement in 2015

What are the top suburbs for retirement in 2015? As we reach our retirement age, one of the most pressing questions on everyone’s mind is where to live. As we are moving forward to a more quiet time in our lives, living in the big city might not always suit our needs and wishes. So where to turn to? The suburbs of course. But, as many of you might already know, not all suburbs are the same and they might not all be as suitable for retirement.

Following, we would like to present you with a list we have compiled of the top 10 suburbs for retirement in 2015, based on a report released by Forbes Magazine. Experts at Forbes analyzed a wide range of indicators in determining their rankings, from home values and distance from suburb to city center, to crime rates and proximity to health care facilities. Only suburbs with a population of over 5,000 were taken into account for the purposes of this countdown.

Is your retirement approaching and you would like to learn more about the best living choices you have at your disposal? Then this is the list for you. You may also consider checking out 10 cheapest places to retire abroad, cheapest places to live in South America, and best places to retire in Florida East Coast.

Here are the top 10 suburbs for retirement in 2015.

Top Suburbs to Retire in America

No. 10: Henderson, Nevada

Population: 266,000

Distance from city centre: 16 miles from Las Vegas

Average home price: $220,000

Cost of living: 4 points below national average

Pluses: low crime rate, good tax climate, local hospital

No. 9: Gilbert, Arizona

Population: 221,000

Distance from city centre: 22 miles from Phoenix

Average home price: $239,000

Cost of living: 7 points below national average

Pluses: three hospitals, very low crime rate, nearby rail services

No. 8: Gaithersburg, Maryland

Population: 63,000

Distance from city centre: 19 miles from Washington

Average home price: $270,000

Cost of living: 17 points above national average

Pluses: nearby hospital and college facilities, rush-hour rail service

No. 7: Fitchburg, Wisconsin

Population: 26,000

Distance from city centre: 5 miles from Madison

Average home price: $234,000

Cost of living: 1 point below the national average

Pluses: great mass transit, local hospital, and low unemployment rate

No. 6: East Grand Rapids, Michigan

Population: 11,000

Distance from city centre: 3 miles from Grand Rapids

Average home price: $328,000

Cost of living: 11 points below the national average

Pluses: low unemployment rates, easy access to hospital and college

No. 5: Eagen, Minnesota

Population: 65,000

Distance from city centre: 10 miles from Minneapolis

Average home price: $255,000

Cost of living: 15 points above national average

Pluses: strong local economy, easy access to facilities, local hospital, and low crime rates

No. 4: Doylestown, Pennsylvania

Population: 8,000

Distance from city centre: 22 miles from Philadelphia

Average home price: $280,000

Cost of living: 9 points above national average

Pluses: local hospital, low crime rate, and on-foot access to most facilities

top suburbs for retirement in 2015

No. 3: Cary, North Carolina

Population: 146,000

Distance from city centre: 9 miles from Raleigh

Average home price: $249,000

Cost of living: 4 points below national average

Pluses: low crime rate, local hospital, good air quality, and strong local economy

No. 2: Broomfield, Oregon

Population: 58,000

Distance from city centre: 13 miles from Denver

Average home price: $284,000

Cost of living: 7 points above national average

Pluses: strong local economy, very low crime rate, good air quality, nearby hospital

No. 1: Beaverton, Oregon

Population: 93,000

Distance from city centre: 9 miles from Portland

Average home price: $275,000

Cost of living: national average

Pluses: quality of air, good weather, rail line connection to downtown Portland, 5 miles away from the nearest hospital, and strong local economy