Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

The Dow Chemical Company (DOW), Alcoa Inc (AA): America’s Energy Advantage

Page 1 of 2

The Dow Chemical Company (NYSE:DOW)The debate that’s raging in Washington over the export of liquefied natural gas, or LNG, has two very distinct sides, and it appears that President Obama is coming down clearly on one of them. On one side is a lobby of American corporations, called America’s Energy Advantage, that supports the restriction of LNG export as a way of protecting American business. On the other side of the argument is the belief that restricting free trade is not only negative for the geopolitical landscape, but it also limits the ability of the United States to bring good-faith complaints against other nations that restrict the export of natural resources.

Statements from the White House suggest that Obama is in the later camp, with U.S. officials believing “that being seen to restrict exports for the benefit of domestic industry would send a terrible signal about the country’s support for free trade,” according to The Washington Post. The push to limit exports — championed by The Dow Chemical Company (NYSE:DOW) and Alcoa Inc (NYSE:AA) — faces certain legal hurdles as well, although exceptions to free trade in the case of natural resources do exist. Ultimately, the net global good may win out over the push to keep American free from dependence of foreign sources of energy.

America’s Energy Advantage
The position of the lobby that wants to limit exports seems fairly straightforward on its face. The shale boom in oil and natural gas has given the U.S. a rare leg up on the global energy resource stage. Natural gas prices in the U.S. are as much as five times lower than they are in Asia. The supply glut has allowed business to upgrade to gas-burning operations — largely a move away from the dirtier energy available from coal — and save billions in production costs.

One of the problems with this position, however, is that natural gas is a major input for several of the productions that The Dow Chemical Company (NYSE:DOW) and others manufacture. This changes the feel of the argument, because keeping input costs low is not as broadly advantageous as keeping energy costs low in general. None of this, of course, considers how natural gas companies such as Chesapeake Energy Corporation (NYSE:CHK) will be affected. As with most such stories, there are several layers to be considered.

Free trade
Of the two arguments in favor of free trade are a legal one, and one of global public opinion. Beginning with the legal side, Article XI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade disallows placing restrictions on export through either licensing or by quotas. While clear exceptions exist, some have argued that to lean on those exceptions, the U.S. would have to limit its own production of natural gas. The general view of the administration has been that allowing free trade to apportion resources is preferable to taking a protectionist attitude.

The public-opinion argument looks to several cases the U.S. had brought against China for its restriction of the export of rare-earth materials. Molycorp Inc (NYSE:MCP), one of the largest rare-earth companies outside China, is just getting its California-based mine online, so reliance on China has been steep. Proponents of free trade — including Obama, apparently — see it as disingenuous to hit China with these types of complaints while making the same types of transgressions.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...