Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

InterOil Corporation (USA) (IOC): Is This Natural Gas Company Putting Its Fate in Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM)’s Hands?

Page 1 of 2

The story of InterOil Corporation (USA) (NYSE:IOC) has unfolded similarly to a soap opera. The company has gone from a mild-mannered refining and marketing business on the island nation of Papua New Guinea to a company with what could prove to be one of the largest natural gas finds in the Asia-Pacific region in the past quarter century. With this vast potential, Interoil wants to export its newfound reserves, but needs outside help to get it done. Based on its recent move, though, it appears that the company is banking its success on its negotiations with Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE:XOM).  Let’s take a look at this situation and how it will affect investors in this company.

Supplying Papua New Guinea for 1,300 years… or the U.S. for one

InterOil Corporation (USA) (NYSE:IOC)The one problem with finding natural gas in Papua New Guinea is that the domestic market is marginal at best. In 2011, the country’s annual gas consumption was equivalent to what the United States consumes in 1.5 hours. So, to monetize any gas found in the country, it will need to be exported. For the past several years this has been the company’s primary goal: develop these gas fields, build an LNG facility, and export to the LNG-hungry Asia-Pacific market.

For InterOil Corporation (USA) (NYSE:IOC), this is much more difficult than it sounds. Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE:XOM) has been building a facility in Papua New Guinea for the past four years, and it will take over $19 billion once its complete. Frankly, Interoil by itself cannot handle the financial burden of building one of these facilities on its own. Even the Papua New Guinea government recognizes that. The government has stipulated that approval of the facility will require that it find a operation partner with the checkbook to take on a project this size and the expertise in LNG facilities.

It looks like that plan may be going away as the company’s negotiations with Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE:XOM) progress. During InterOil Corporation (USA) (NYSE:IOC)’s most recent conference call, newly appointed CEO Michael Hession said that plans to build its own facility are being shelved and the company will focus on its negotiations to be a supplier of Exxon’s facility that is slated to come on line next year.

In Exxon we trust

By removing InterOil Corporation (USA) (NYSE:IOC)’s own LNG facility from the equation, it speeds up revenue growth for the company. Let’s do a little back of the napkin calculation to explore the two options. Let’s say, for example, that Interoil provides 20% of the natural gas for Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE:XOM)’s 6.9 million tons per year facility versus building its own 4 million tons per year facility. It has taken Exxon four years to construct this facility that will be ready in 2014, so assuming that InterOil Corporation (USA) (NYSE:IOC)’s facility were to follow a similar schedule, it would not come on line until 2017 at the earliest. Based on the project start-up times and the rate of production, total revenue generated from its own facility would not equal the Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE:XOM) option until around 2020. This also doesn’t include the additional costs that would be incurred to bring its own facility on line.

This truncated timetable to monetizing natural gas would allow the company to speed up its development plans, increase revenue in the near to medium term, and let the company “stick to its knitting” as Hession said during the recent conference call. There is one catch to this option, though: By shelving it’s own LNG facility, it has weakened its position at the negotiation table, which could lead to a less favorable deal.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...