Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Exelon Corporation (EXC): Fossil Fuel and Alternative Energy Investments Can Coexist

Page 1 of 2

Exelon Corporation (NYSE:EXC)The energy industry has always had a precarious relationship with politics. From the days of land grants to the timber industry in the 1800s to government-backed loans for the energy industry today, the U.S. government has always had some sort of influence on the outcome of energy policy. Whenever an industry straddles the line between business and politics as closely as energy does, people’s opinions on the subject can get very entrenched.

The issue for investors, though, is that these opinions can lead to several biases for or against certain parts of the industry. This can lead investors to not see opportunities that are available to them. Take two industries on the far end of each spectrum: coal and solar energy. In some way or another, each of these two energy sources has been shunned by its opposition, but those who let political biases control their investments are missing out on some very lucrative opportunities.

The old guard
Coal has been what you can consider the whipping boy for the environmentally conscious crowd for years, and now fans of natural gas are taking a couple jabs at it as well. For those looking for a case against coal, there are some truths to back up that stance. Exelon Corporation (NYSE:EXC) CEO Christopher Crane has gone on record saying that 19,000 megawatts of coal-fired plants will be permanently shut down by 2015 because of stricter environmental regulations. Also, U.S. Energy Information Administration data shows that natural gas has been gaining market share against coal for the past couple of years.

Looking at these trends might lead one to believe that the glory days of coal are numbered, and these companies are certainly priced to fail. All four of the country’s largest coal companies trade at values well below the average for the S&P 500.

Company Price to Tangible Book Value P/E Ratio (TTM)
S&P 500 5.40 17.7
Peabody Energy Corporation (NYSE:BTU) 1.09 9.22
Arch Coal Inc (NYSE:ACI) 0.41 N/A
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ:ARLP) 2.52 10.68
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. (NYSE:ANR) 0.39 N/A

Source: S&P Capital IQ

Yet despite the sentiment surrounding the industry, several coal companies have posted record quarters. This quarter, Alliance shattered its previous earnings record and beat Wall St. expectations by over 40%. Also, nearly every coal company is ramping up their export capacity to meet demand for coal overseas. A recent report by the International Energy Agency estimates that coal will pass oil as the largest source of energy by 2017, with China and India being the premier drivers of demand.

Coal has been a major source of energy for over a hundred years, and it looks as though this trend will continue for quite some time.

The new kid on the block
The solar industry has its own bad reputation, it can’t shake the claim that the industry is artificially held up by government subsidies. Epic failures like Solyndra have given anti-solar advocates much to preach about. But, just as the government will always have a hand in the energy sector one way or another, each energy industry will have its winners and losers.

By simply looking at the losers in the solar industry, you would be overlooking some of the successes in the industry as well. In the first quarter of 2013, 83% of all electricity capacity that was added to the grid came from either wind or solar, and 100% of March’s power additions came from solar alone. Much of this has come as a result of greater efficiency from solar panels, making the construction of these facilities comparable to fossil fuel plants. According to a recent article in The Economist, it costs about $4.74 per watt to construct and install a solar generation facility, where it costs about $3.00 per watt to construct a coal facility and $1.00 per watt for a natural gas plant. Keep in mind, though, that once these facilities are on line, only one of them has a free fuel source.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...