Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

ConocoPhillips (COP), Apache Corporation (APA), CNOOC Limited (ADR) (CEO): Is Natural Gas a Flaming Buy? Five Cheap Natural Gas Producers to Watch

Page 1 of 2

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP)It is probably fair to say that the boom in natural gas has been one of the most unprofitable revolutions in recent memory for investors in natural gas producing companies. Even the legendary Warren Buffett admitted that he overpaid for ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) during the heady days leading up to the credit crisis in 2008. This lesson should not be lost on other investors: when energy prices are high, companies that derive their profits from the production of energy may appear to be cheaper than they are. Conversely, when prices are low and animal spirits have been purged from the market, shares that may appear expensive based on trailing earnings may actually be quite cheap.

Natural gas producers were picked specifically because the energy boom is in the process of transforming the United States toward a path of greater energy independence. Over the long-term, this trend is expected to continue. With power plants switching over from coal to natural gas, demand seems likely to be strong into the foreseeable future.

A number of natural gas producers were screened with this investment thesis in mind. Apache Corporation (NYSE:APA) is one of the largest independent exploration and production companies in the United States. The company derives approximately equal portions of its revenue from natural gas and liquids with 2.99 billion barrels oil equivalent (BOE) in proven reserves. Apache Corporation (NYSE:APA) trades below tangible book value, which did not occur even during the 2008 bear market.

CNOOC Limited (ADR) (NYSE:CEO) engages in the same activities, with much of its production offshore of the Chinese mainland. With a market capitalization of nearly triple that of Apache it has proven reserves only slightly more at 3.19 BOE. Because natural gas prices have traded considerably lower in the United States, the valuation is a good bit higher in terms of price/book. Still growth of its book value has been a robust 21.79% annualized over the past five years. With a solid dividend yield CNOOC Limited (ADR) (NYSE:CEO) is an interesting play on emerging market growth in natural gas production. It should also be noted that natural gas is approximately 25% of the company’s revenue. Thus, CNOOC Limited (ADR) (NYSE:CEO) is somewhat more comparable to a Chinese Exxon than a pure play natural gas producer.

Chesapeake Energy Corporation (NYSE:CHK) is likely the most widely known company on this list and ran into some controversy with the CEO borrowing against his stake in company wells via loans that were not disclosed to shareholders. Since the company has been forced to divest itself of assets. While the company appears cheap, prior management indiscretions still seem like a good reason to avoid the shares.

EnCana Corporation (USA) (NYSE:ECA) is still one of the largest natural gas producers, but has suffered substantial declines in revenue and per share book value over the past several years. Its revenue is less diversified, with 93% coming from natural gas and its debt ratio has been on the rise as natural gas prices have retreated. While prices could rebound strongly along with natural gas, the company seems to be higher in risk.

Finally, EOG Resources Inc (NYSE:EOG) has a good deal less in proven reserves as a proportion of its market capitalization with 1.81 BOE in 2012. The share price has held up well, even given the lower profitability of the company over the past several years. As such, it appears that the valuation is not discounting the lower price of natural gas to the same extent as other companies.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...