Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.B) & Buffett’s Hidden $2.3 Billion Acquisitions

Page 1 of 2

Bank of America Corp (BAC), Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)After the much anticipated release of Warren Buffett’s annual letter to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK.B) shareholders last week, many news outlets highlighted Buffett’s lamentation of failing to complete any major acquisitions in 2012. “I pursued a couple of elephants,” Buffett wrote, “but came up empty-handed.”

Of course, Buffett was quick to point out last month’s joint acquisition of ketchup king H.J. Heinz , for which Berkshire put $12 billion of its hard-earned cash to work.

Antelope hunting works, too
However, if you haven’t read the letter — and read it you should — you may have missed an important piece of the puzzle by absorbing Buffett’s thoughts out of context.

Consider the following paragraph from the Oracle of Omaha on page four:

“Though I failed to land a major acquisition in 2012, the managers of our subsidiaries did far better. We had a record year for “bolt-on” purchases, spending about $2.3 billion for 26 companies that were melded into our existing businesses. These transactions were completed without Berkshire issuing any shares. Charlie and I love these acquisitions: Usually they are low-risk, burden headquarters not at all, and expand the scope of our proven managers.”

On the surface, it seems remarkable Berkshire was able to absorb 26 stand-alone businesses into its existing operations without the greater market so much as batting an eye. Of course, given Berkshire’s enormous market capitalization of more than $250 billion, cash on hand of $35 billion (after accounting for the Heinz deal) and growing, and the average acquiree’s size of just $88 million, each of these tiny companies looks like a drop in Berkshire’s mind-bogglingly large bucket.

If anything, the size of these acquisitions looks eerily similar to those typically pursued by “mini-Berkshire” and fellow financial holding company Markel Corporation (NYSE:MKL) which, as I noted last month, tends to focus on buying companies with an enterprise value of less than $300 million. When combined, however, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK.B)’s minor acquisitions nearly approach the total $2.5 billion enterprise value of Markel’s largest-ever purchase in competitor Alterra late last year.

But why (else) do they matter?
From Buffett’s comments, we can also see these small purchases benefit Berkshire in a number of other ways massive acquisitions cannot.

First, acquiring small companies requires taking on little risk with no burden on Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK.B)’s headquarters. In short, each acquisition in and of itself is small enough to be managed by existing business segment managers, and should any aspect of the integration fail, it wouldn’t have a significant negative effect on overall operations.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...