Dear Valued Visitor,

We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software.

Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member.

Basic Needs Portfolio Selection: The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)

Page 1 of 2

The Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE:PG)Nine weeks ago, I outlined my plans to create a portfolio of 10 companies that all have one thing in common: They provide a basic need or deliver life’s necessities. It’s my contention that basic needs companies can offer investors stability and growth throughout any market environment thanks to consistent demand, incredible pricing power, and delectable dividends. This portfolio, which I have dubbed the “Basic Needs Portfolio,” will be pitted against the S&P 500 over a period of three years with the expectation of outperformance for all 10 stocks. I’ll be rolling out a new selection to this portfolio every week until I’ve listed all 10.

You can review my previous eight selections here:

Waste Management

Intel

NextEra Energy

MasterCard

Chevron

Select Medical

Ford

American Water Works

Today, I plan to introduce the ninth of 10 selections to the Basic Needs Portfolio: The Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE:PG)

How it fits with our theme
Since I’m developing an all-encompassing basic needs portfolio, you probably knew it was just a matter of time before I introduced the consumer-goods stock of all consumer-goods stocks — namely The Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE:PG).

Source: Au Kirk, Flickr.

The reason behind the selection is very simple — P&G’s products are often near-necessity goods and, as such, possess inelastic pricing and near-inelastic demand. Without sounding like a textbook, this just means that whether the economy is booming or in a recession, consumers aren’t very likely to change many of their buying habits. You need toothpaste regardless of how the economy is doing, and consumer-goods companies know that, which gives them little incentive to ever lower their price on toothpaste products. The same goes for a myriad of The Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE:PG)’s products, which range from detergents to personal-care and beauty products. Selling a wide variety of products and possessing strong pricing power is the perfect formula for inclusion into the Basic Needs Portfolio.

The risk
Unfortunately, no investment is a sure thing, and even a well-diversified consumer-products company like P&G comes with its own unique set of risks.

First and foremost, while recessions don’t necessitate that The Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE:PG) lower its pricing on its consumer goods, since we know demand will stay relatively the same, that doesn’t stop cash-strapped consumers who are taking home less per paycheck from trading down to non-name-brand products to save money. This was actually the culprit for weaker earnings in recent quarters for both P&G and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (NYSE:CHD), which were basically forced into a pricing war in the detergent aisle to attract consumers at the detriment of their gross margin.

Being a global company means having exposure to foreign currencies. Although most investors will look past minor fluctuations in underlying currencies, big changes in overseas currency can have a whopping positive or negative effect on profits. For Kimberly Clark Corp (NYSE:KMB), the company behind Kleenex tissues and Huggies diapers, it was forced to take a $36 million charge related solely to rapid devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar in February when it reported its first-quarter results. Many global consumer-goods companies are facing similar currency translation pressures.

The final risk would be beefing up advertising only to see it have little to no effect on improving sales and brand-imaging. Former P&G CEO Robert McDonald, who served The Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE:PG) as CEO for four years, led the costliest advertising budget in the world yet still failed to deliver big market-share gains in detergents and other key areas throughout much of his tenure. His predecessor, A.G. Lafley, has since come out of retirement to succeed McDonald, but skeptics remain as to whether P&G is back on the right track.

Why Procter & Gamble?
The first thing that attracts me to P&G is its ability to streamline its productivity and reduce costs. In February, The Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE:PG) hit its goal of shedding 5,700 global jobs five months ahead of schedule and plans to reduce 2% to 4% of its nonmanufacturing jobs annually through 2016. That may sound like a company that’s in trouble, but it actually points to a consumer-products maker that’s getting more efficient in its production through investments in newer technologies, and is boosting margins through cost-cutting measures.

Page 1 of 2
Loading Comments...